It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and SHOP’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and SHOP’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +11.44% price change this week, while COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +0.74% , and SHOP (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated -7.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.39%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.76%.
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
COIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
SHOP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.85% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
@Packaged Software (-0.58% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CLSK | COIN | SHOP | |
| Capitalization | 3.73B | 41.7B | 148B |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 1.29B | 2.14B |
| Gain YTD | 43.478 | -30.004 | -29.335 |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 58.19 | 111.52 |
| Revenue | 740M | 6.56B | 12.4B |
| Total Cash | 935M | 10.7B | 5.74B |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 7.96B | 179M |
CLSK | SHOP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as SHOP (87) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to SHOP’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SHOP (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to SHOP’s over the last 12 months.
SHOP's SMR Rating (67) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (99) in the null industry. This means that SHOP’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SHOP (70) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to SHOP’s over the last 12 months.
SHOP's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (85) in the null industry. This means that SHOP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | COIN | SHOP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COIN has been closely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COIN jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COIN | 100% | -1.78% | ||
| AFRM - COIN | 81% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| MSTR - COIN | 81% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| RIOT - COIN | 77% Closely correlated | -5.57% | ||
| U - COIN | 74% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| HOOD - COIN | 73% Closely correlated | -6.57% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOP has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP | 100% | +1.56% | ||
| COIN - SHOP | 67% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| CLSK - SHOP | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.98% | ||
| RIOT - SHOP | 62% Loosely correlated | -5.57% | ||
| FTNT - SHOP | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| PAYO - SHOP | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||