Advertisement
CLSK or HUBS or MDB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. HubSpot (HUBS) vs. MongoDB (MDB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CLSK (CleanSpark) has shown strong year-to-date gains driven by Bitcoin production growth and power capacity expansion amid volatile crypto markets.
- HUBS (HubSpot) delivered solid revenue growth and returned to GAAP profitability in its latest quarter, though shares reacted negatively post-earnings.
- MDB (MongoDB) benefits from AI-related demand for its database platform, with shares posting notable recent-month gains ahead of upcoming earnings.
- Business models differ sharply: CLSK focuses on energy-intensive Bitcoin mining with infrastructure development, while HUBS and MDB operate in software with recurring revenue streams.
- Recent sentiment reflects sector-specific catalysts—crypto and energy for CLSK, enterprise software adoption for HUBS and MDB—with varying degrees of analyst support.
- Valuation sensitivity and risk profiles vary, with CLSK exhibiting higher volatility tied to Bitcoin prices compared to the more stable software peers.
Introduction
Investors and traders seeking to compare performance across distinct sectors often examine stocks like CLSK, HUBS, and MDB for insights into relative momentum, growth trajectories, and market positioning. CleanSpark operates in the Bitcoin mining and energy infrastructure space, HubSpot provides customer relationship management software, and MongoDB delivers a modern database platform. This comparison appeals to those evaluating technology-driven growth stocks, crypto-adjacent assets, and software companies amid evolving macroeconomic conditions and sector-specific developments over recent weeks.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark, Inc. engages in Bitcoin mining and the development of power infrastructure for digital assets and potential hyperscale applications. In recent market activity, the stock has benefited from operational updates highlighting increased hashrate, expanded Bitcoin holdings, and progress on power capacity contracts, including ERCOT approvals. Fiscal second-quarter results released in mid-May showed revenue of $136.4 million alongside a net loss, reflecting typical mining economics tied to Bitcoin prices and production costs. Analyst commentary has remained largely constructive, with several firms raising price targets amid the company's infrastructure expansion efforts. Price behavior in recent weeks has reflected broader crypto sentiment and company-specific catalysts around capacity growth.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot, Inc. offers an integrated customer platform encompassing marketing, sales, and service tools for businesses. Its first-quarter 2026 results, reported in early May, featured revenue of $881 million, representing 23% year-over-year growth, alongside a return to GAAP profitability. The company raised full-year guidance, citing continued subscription momentum. Shares experienced downward pressure immediately following the earnings release, consistent with market reactions to high-growth software names even when results meet or exceed expectations. Recent performance has been shaped by enterprise software spending trends and investor focus on margin expansion and recurring revenue stability.
MDB Overview and Recent Performance
MongoDB, Inc. provides a document-oriented database platform widely used in modern application development, with growing emphasis on AI and vector search capabilities. Recent weeks have featured positive sentiment around AI production readiness announcements and anticipation ahead of fiscal first-quarter 2027 results scheduled for late May. Shares have registered gains over the trailing month, supported by broader interest in data infrastructure for artificial intelligence workloads. Earlier fiscal 2026 results demonstrated sustained revenue expansion, particularly in the Atlas cloud service. Market activity reflects positioning within the software infrastructure sector amid ongoing AI adoption themes.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a much larger pool of hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Performance statistics, win rates, and drawdown metrics differ widely across the bots, allowing users to review historical results and suitability for specific assets. The section provides an informational overview of automated trading options without endorsing any particular outcome.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The three companies operate in markedly different segments: CLSK derives revenue primarily from Bitcoin mining and is exposed to cryptocurrency price fluctuations and energy costs, whereas HUBS and MDB generate recurring subscription revenue from enterprise software customers. Growth drivers for CLSK center on hashrate expansion and power infrastructure monetization, while HUBS emphasizes customer platform adoption and MDB highlights AI-enhanced database features. Recent momentum has favored CLSK on operational scale-ups and MDB on AI tailwinds, with HUBS showing steadier but more muted post-earnings movement. Risk factors include commodity price volatility for CLSK versus execution and competition risks for the software names. Valuation sensitivity tends to be higher for growth-oriented software stocks during shifts in interest rate expectations or spending outlooks.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in operational metrics, relative stability in revenue visibility, and positioning around current catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward HUBS for its demonstrated earnings resilience and guidance updates within the software sector. MDB follows closely due to AI-related momentum, while CLSK reflects higher variability linked to external commodity influences. This assessment draws from recent performance patterns and does not constitute investment guidance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and MDB’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MDB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and MDB’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- MDB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.27% , and MDB (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated -9.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.70%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.76%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.40%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
MDB is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.04% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Packaged Software (-2.15% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-2.01% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CLSK | HUBS | MDB | |
| Capitalization | 4.17B | 9.25B | 24.3B |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 267M | 26.8M |
| Gain YTD | 60.375 | -54.964 | -27.937 |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 90.95 | N/A |
| Revenue | 740M | 3.3B | 2.6B |
| Total Cash | 935M | 1.69B | 2.43B |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 247M | 30.4M |
CLSK | HUBS | MDB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 60 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 86 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 88 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 97 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 26 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDB's Valuation (51) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (72) in the null industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (78) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MDB's stock grew similarly to CLSK’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
MDB's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MDB's stock grew similarly to CLSK’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MDB (92) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as CLSK (98) in the null industry. This means that HUBS's stock grew similarly to MDB’s and similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MDB (47) in the Packaged Software industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (88) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK's stock grew similarly to MDB’s and somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (97) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as MDB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK's stock grew similarly to HUBS’s and similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | HUBS | MDB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 74% | 14 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VFLO | 45.50 | 0.17 | +0.38% |
| VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF | |||
| HYGH | 86.49 | -0.21 | -0.24% |
| iShares Interest Rate Hdg Hi Yld Bd ETF | |||
| HFEQ | 23.95 | -0.08 | -0.35% |
| Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | |||
| RNWZ | 31.09 | -0.13 | -0.43% |
| TrueShares Eagle Glbl Rnwbls Engy IncETF | |||
| FLLA | 26.44 | -0.30 | -1.11% |
| Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | |||
MDB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDB has been closely correlated with SNOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDB jumps, then SNOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDB | 100% | -5.77% | ||
| SNOW - MDB | 67% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| COIN - MDB | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.10% | ||
| CLSK - MDB | 60% Loosely correlated | -5.58% | ||
| HUBS - MDB | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.29% | ||
| RIOT - MDB | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.43% | ||
More | ||||