CNQ
Price
$48.41
Change
+$0.10 (+0.21%)
Updated
Oct 6, 12:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.12B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PR
Price
$22.25
Change
+$0.02 (+0.09%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:08 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.84B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WDS
Price
$21.62
Change
-$0.15 (-0.69%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:10 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.33B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNQ or PR or WDS

CNQ vs PR vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ vs PR vs WDS: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
PR
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
617769
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
211241
SMR RATING
1..100
366692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
414045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
341014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDS's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as PR (46) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CNQ (68) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS's stock grew similarly to PR’s and somewhat faster than CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (21) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as WDS (41) in the null industry. This means that PR's stock grew similarly to CNQ’s and similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's SMR Rating (36) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (66) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for WDS (92) in the null industry. This means that CNQ's stock grew similarly to PR’s and somewhat faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as WDS (45) in the null industry. This means that PR's stock grew similarly to CNQ’s and similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.

PR's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (14) in the null industry, and is in the same range as CNQ (34) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PR's stock grew similarly to WDS’s and similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNQPRWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2026
Stock price -- (CNQ: $48.31, PR: $22.23, WDS: $21.77)
Brand notoriety: PR and WDS are not notable and CNQ is notable
The three companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNQ: 131%, PR: 86%, WDS: 88%
Market capitalization -- CNQ: $98.12B, PR: $17.84B, WDS: $42.33B
$CNQ is valued at $98.12B, while PR has a market capitalization of $17.84B, and WDS's market capitalization is $42.33B. The market cap for tickers in this @Oil & Gas Production ranges from $100 to $151.42B. The average market capitalization across the @Oil & Gas Production industry is $9.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and WDS’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the long-term than CNQ and WDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and WDS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the short-term than CNQ, which in turn is a better option than WDS.

Price Growth

CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while PR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +4.37% , and WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price fluctuated -1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

PR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

WDS is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.22% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CNQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NYT64.001.30
+2.07%
New York Times Co
TNON3.70N/A
N/A
Tenon Medical Inc
GORO3.25-0.01
-0.31%
Goldgroup Mining Inc
DRD24.17-0.13
-0.53%
DRDGOLD Ltd
AIFC0.47-0.04
-7.35%
Ai Financial Corporation

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
+0.50%
OVV - PR
87%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
CHRD - PR
86%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
DVN - PR
84%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
FANG - PR
83%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
MTDR - PR
83%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
More

WDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been closely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDS
1D Price
Change %
WDS100%
-0.09%
VET - WDS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
CNQ - WDS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
PR - WDS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
CHRD - WDS
67%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
OVV - WDS
67%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
More