COP
Price
$130.66
Change
-$1.18 (-0.90%)
Updated
Aug 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
158.38B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FANG
Price
$199.83
Change
-$0.06 (-0.03%)
Updated
Aug 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.97B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MUR
Price
$34.70
Change
+$0.07 (+0.20%)
Updated
Aug 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.96B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COP or FANG or MUR

COP vs FANG vs MUR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2026
Stock price -- (COP: $131.84FANG: $199.89MUR: $34.62)
Brand notoriety: COP and FANG are notable and MUR is not notable
The three companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COP: 92%, FANG: 92%, MUR: 71%
Market capitalization -- COP: $158.38B, FANG: $55.97B, MUR: $4.96B
$COP is valued at $158.38B, while FANG has a market capitalization of $55.97B, and MUR's market capitalization is $4.96B. The market cap for tickers in this @Oil & Gas Production ranges from $158.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Oil & Gas Production industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFANG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and MUR’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FANG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MUR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COP and MUR are a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and MUR’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than COP, which in turn is a better option than MUR.

Price Growth

COP (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +1.63% price change this week, while FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -4.82% , and MUR (@Oil & Gas Production) price fluctuated -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

COP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

MUR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.88% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COP($158B) has a higher market cap than FANG($56B) and MUR($4.96B). FANG has higher P/E ratio than COP and MUR: FANG (38.07) vs COP (17.44) and MUR (17.14). COP YTD gains are higher at: 43.944 vs. FANG (35.239) and MUR (14.077). COP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 27.8B vs. FANG (7.38B) and MUR (1.63B). MUR has less debt than FANG and COP: MUR (2.3B) vs FANG (13.9B) and COP (23.3B). COP has higher revenues than FANG and MUR: COP (63.3B) vs FANG (17B) and MUR (2.99B).
COPFANGMUR
Capitalization158B56B4.96B
EBITDA27.8B7.38B1.63B
Gain YTD43.94435.23914.077
P/E Ratio17.4438.0717.14
Revenue63.3B17B2.99B
Total Cash4.02BN/AN/A
Total Debt23.3B13.9B2.3B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COP vs FANG vs MUR: Fundamental Ratings
COP
FANG
MUR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
206160
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
243063
SMR RATING
1..100
949187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
142548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19417
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MUR's Valuation (36) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as COP (62) and is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (98). This means that MUR's stock grew similarly to COP’s and somewhat faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

COP's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (30) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MUR (63). This means that COP's stock grew similarly to FANG’s and somewhat faster than MUR’s over the last 12 months.

MUR's SMR Rating (87) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (91) and is in the same range as COP (94). This means that MUR's stock grew similarly to FANG’s and similarly to COP’s over the last 12 months.

COP's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (25) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MUR (48). This means that COP's stock grew similarly to FANG’s and somewhat faster than MUR’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MUR (17) and is in the same range as COP (19). This means that FANG's stock grew similarly to MUR’s and similarly to COP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPFANGMUR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMM44.070.88
+2.03%
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
WEED21.990.27
+1.23%
Roundhill Cannabis ETF
SPWO33.770.37
+1.11%
SP Funds S&P World ETF
IWY284.822.10
+0.74%
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
JQC4.770.01
+0.21%
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund

COP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COP has been closely correlated with EOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COP jumps, then EOG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COP
1D Price
Change %
COP100%
-1.13%
EOG - COP
85%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
DVN - COP
83%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
CHRD - COP
82%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
OXY - COP
80%
Closely correlated
-2.83%
OVV - COP
79%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
More

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
-2.78%
CHRD - FANG
83%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
DVN - FANG
83%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
OVV - FANG
82%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
EOG - FANG
80%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
SM - FANG
79%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
More

MUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUR has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUR jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUR
1D Price
Change %
MUR100%
-3.83%
CHRD - MUR
81%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
APA - MUR
79%
Closely correlated
-3.75%
OVV - MUR
76%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
TALO - MUR
76%
Closely correlated
-2.54%
COP - MUR
74%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
More