This comparison examines CPRT, LOW, and ULTA to highlight differences in business models, recent financial results, and market positioning. The analysis draws on earnings reports and observable performance trends from recent weeks. Institutional investors, active traders, and portfolio managers seeking sector diversification across consumer discretionary and industrial segments may find the relative performance and sentiment shifts relevant for informed decision-making.
Copart operates an online auction platform for vehicles, primarily serving insurance companies, dealers, and international buyers. In recent market activity, the company reported Q3 2026 results on May 21 that exceeded consensus estimates. Revenue reached $1.24 billion, reflecting 2.1% year-over-year growth, while GAAP EPS of $0.43 surpassed the $0.41 estimate. Adjusted EBITDA also beat projections. International unit volumes contributed positively, offsetting softer U.S. insurance activity. Stock price behavior during this period reflected measured responses to the earnings details amid broader market conditions.
Lowe's Companies operates a network of home improvement retail stores and e-commerce platforms, serving both do-it-yourself consumers and professional contractors. The company released Q1 2026 results on May 20, posting total sales of $23.1 billion and comparable sales growth of 0.6%. Adjusted diluted EPS rose 3.8% to $3.03. Online sales increased 15.5%, with strength in appliances, home services, and Pro segment sales. Management affirmed its full-year 2026 outlook. Recent performance aligned with seasonal execution and acquisition-related investments.
Ulta Beauty operates a chain of beauty retail stores and an e-commerce platform offering cosmetics, skincare, and related services. The company is scheduled to report Q1 2026 results on June 2. Consensus estimates call for revenue of $3.08 billion and EPS of $6.87. Prior fiscal year results (ended January 2026) showed net sales growth of 9.7% to $12.4 billion and comparable sales up 5.4%. Recent stock price movements occurred ahead of the earnings release, with positioning influenced by broader retail sector dynamics.
Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots on its Trending AI Robots page. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest performers suited to prevailing market conditions appear in the trending section. Recent highlights include bots achieving returns such as +149.94% and +91.51% over short periods, with selections drawn from a pool of 351 total bots, of which 25 represent the top curated choices. Each bot features distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current options aligned with individual objectives.
Business models present clear contrasts: CPRT functions as a marketplace operator with recurring auction volumes, LOW relies on physical and digital retail with cyclical housing exposure, and ULTA focuses on discretionary beauty spending sensitive to consumer sentiment. Growth drivers include international expansion for CPRT, Pro and online channels for LOW, and new store and product initiatives for ULTA. Recent momentum favored earnings beats at CPRT and LOW, while ULTA awaits its next catalyst. Risk factors encompass volume variability in auctions, housing market fluctuations for retail, and fashion-driven demand shifts in beauty. Sector exposure ranges from industrial services to consumer staples-adjacent retail, affecting valuation sensitivity during rate or economic shifts. Market sentiment has responded to earnings precision and forward guidance across the three names.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, trend stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term characteristics to CPRT due to its demonstrated beat and international volume support. LOW follows closely with affirmed guidance and diversified channels. ULTA remains positioned for potential volatility around its upcoming report. These assessments reflect probabilistic evaluations rather than guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLOW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and ULTA’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and ULTA’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CPRT (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -0.60% price change this week, while LOW (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was -0.12% , and ULTA (@Specialty Stores) price fluctuated +6.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.52%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.32%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.85%.
CPRT is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.
LOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.
ULTA is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Home Improvement Chains (+4.48% weekly)The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.
@Specialty Stores (-0.94% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| CPRT | LOW | ULTA | |
| Capitalization | 27.8B | 124B | 20.9B |
| EBITDA | 1.92B | 12.6B | 1.91B |
| Gain YTD | -23.244 | -7.117 | -19.750 |
| P/E Ratio | 18.31 | 18.12 | 17.43 |
| Revenue | 4.64B | 88.4B | 12.7B |
| Total Cash | 4.2B | 786M | 221M |
| Total Debt | 93.1M | 42.5B | 2.3B |
CPRT | LOW | ULTA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 10 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 4 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 57 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 52 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LOW's Valuation (3) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPRT (84) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ULTA (89) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW's stock grew significantly faster than CPRT’s and significantly faster than ULTA’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LOW (67) in the Home Improvement Chains industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CPRT (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ULTA's stock grew similarly to LOW’s and somewhat faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's SMR Rating (4) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as ULTA (21) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CPRT (50) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LOW's stock grew similarly to ULTA’s and somewhat faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as ULTA (62) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is in the same range as CPRT (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LOW's stock grew similarly to ULTA’s and similarly to CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as ULTA (57) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CPRT (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LOW's stock grew similarly to ULTA’s and somewhat faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
| CPRT | LOW | ULTA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 59% | 10 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.