CRWD, DDOG, and SNOW represent prominent technology stocks in the cybersecurity, cloud observability, and data platform sectors, respectively. These companies share exposure to artificial intelligence adoption and enterprise cloud spending, making their relative performance relevant for investors seeking diversified exposure within the software industry. Traders and portfolio managers evaluating growth-oriented technology holdings may find this comparison useful for assessing differences in business models, recent price behavior, and market sentiment during periods of sector rotation.
CRWD provides cloud-based cybersecurity solutions with a focus on endpoint protection and threat intelligence. In recent weeks, the stock has benefited from multiple analyst price target increases and partnerships emphasizing AI-enhanced security capabilities. Year-to-date returns stand near 63% as of late July 2026, with the share price closing around $190.86 on July 31. Sentiment has been supported by positive institutional commentary on demand trends, though the stock has experienced volatility typical of growth technology names.
DDOG delivers cloud observability and monitoring platforms that help organizations manage application performance and infrastructure. Recent market activity has highlighted accelerating growth tied to AI workloads, contributing to year-to-date returns approaching 97% as of late July 2026. The stock closed near $267.97 on July 31. Analyst revisions have reflected optimism around customer expansion, with the company maintaining a position near the upper end of its recent trading range amid broader technology sector movements.
SNOW operates a cloud data platform enabling secure data sharing and analytics across multiple environments. Recent developments include the introduction of AI-focused tools such as a centralized gateway for agent interoperability, alongside analyst price target raises including one to $500. Year-to-date returns have reached approximately 34% as of late July 2026, with the stock closing at $293.28 on July 31 after touching a 52-week high near $304. Sentiment has been influenced by enterprise AI spending patterns and product innovation.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available on the platform that trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. The bots encompass a wide variety of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, allowing users to review statistical profiles suited to different approaches. This resource provides investors with transparent access to quantitative tools for market analysis.
CRWD focuses on cybersecurity with AI integration for threat detection, while DDOG emphasizes real-time observability across cloud environments and SNOW centers on scalable data warehousing and analytics. Growth drivers include AI adoption for all three, though CRWD faces sector-specific regulatory and competition dynamics, DDOG benefits from infrastructure complexity, and SNOW contends with data platform pricing pressures. Recent momentum has favored DDOG on relative returns, followed by CRWD, with SNOW showing steadier but lower gains. Risk factors encompass valuation multiples sensitive to interest rate expectations and earnings delivery, with each stock exhibiting different levels of correlation to broader technology indices. Market sentiment remains constructive across the group based on recent analyst activity, highlighting trade-offs between specialized security positioning, observability scalability, and data platform versatility.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, stability following corporate developments, and positioning amid AI-related catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models indicate a probabilistic preference toward CRWD in the near term relative to the peer group. This assessment reflects comparative momentum indicators and does not constitute investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDDOG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and SNOW’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DDOG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and SNOW’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +12.34% price change this week, while DDOG (@Packaged Software) price change was -12.70% , and SNOW (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +12.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +5.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +6.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.25%.
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
DDOG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
SNOW is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (+6.61% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | DDOG | SNOW | |
| Capitalization | 218B | 84B | 115B |
| EBITDA | 329M | 229M | -936.8M |
| Gain YTD | 82.968 | 72.020 | 44.967 |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 467.86 | N/A |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 3.67B | 5.03B |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 4.76B | 2.96B |
| Total Debt | 821M | 1.29B | 2.77B |
CRWD | DDOG | SNOW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 19 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 51 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 87 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 38 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 26 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNOW's Valuation (93) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as DDOG (94) in the null industry, and is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that SNOW's stock grew similarly to DDOG’s and similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDOG (51) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for SNOW (85) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew somewhat faster than DDOG’s and significantly faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CRWD (92) in the null industry, and is in the same range as SNOW (99) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that DDOG's stock grew similarly to CRWD’s and similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
SNOW's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (36) in the null industry, and is in the same range as DDOG (38) in the null industry. This means that SNOW's stock grew similarly to CRWD’s and similarly to DDOG’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (67) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for SNOW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that DDOG's stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s and significantly faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | DDOG | SNOW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 77% | 17 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | +3.39% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 79% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 70% Closely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | +6.42% | ||
| TENB - CRWD | 67% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.74% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNOW has been closely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNOW jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNOW | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| MDB - SNOW | 67% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| COIN - SNOW | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| NET - SNOW | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| CLSK - SNOW | 61% Loosely correlated | -5.56% | ||
| ESTC - SNOW | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||