Advertisement
EME or MTZ or MYRG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? EMCOR Group (EME) vs. MasTec (MTZ) vs. MYR Group (MYRG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- EME, MTZ, and MYRG have delivered exceptional year-to-date gains of approximately 53%, 101%, and 114% respectively, far outpacing the S&P 500's 6% rise, driven by infrastructure and electrification demand.
- All three reported record Q1 2026 results with revenue beats: EME up 20% to $4.63B, MTZ up 34% to $3.83B, and MYRG up 20% to $1.0B.
- Backlogs signal robust visibility: MTZ at record $20.3B, EME remaining power (RPO) at $15.62B, and MYRG at $2.84B.
- Each raised full-year 2026 guidance amid data center, clean energy, and transmission tailwinds, boosting sentiment in recent market activity.
- Recent weeks saw sharp rallies post-earnings, with MYRG up over 50% in the past month, reflecting heightened momentum in electrical construction peers.
- Relative performance highlights MTZ and MYRG's higher volatility and upside from diversified infrastructure exposure.
Introduction
EMCOR Group (EME), MasTec (MTZ), and MYR Group (MYRG) are leading players in the electrical and infrastructure construction sector, benefiting from surging demand for data centers, renewable energy, and grid upgrades. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business drivers, and market positioning amid broader infrastructure spending. Traders seeking momentum in industrials and investors eyeing long-term electrification trends will find value in understanding their relative strengths, as all three have significantly outperformed benchmarks in recent market activity.
EME Overview and Recent Performance
EMCOR Group (EME), a specialty contractor providing electrical, mechanical, and facilities services across the U.S. and U.K., has seen robust stock gains in recent weeks following strong Q1 2026 results. Revenue climbed 20% year-over-year to a record $4.63 billion, with adjusted EPS of $6.84 beating estimates by 15%, driven by data center projects and mechanical services. Remaining performance obligations (RPO, backlog equivalent) reached $15.62 billion, underscoring multi-year visibility. The company raised full-year 2026 guidance to $18.5-19.25 billion in revenue and $28.25-29.75 EPS, reflecting confidence in industrial and energy infrastructure demand. Shares have risen over 50% in the past year, with recent momentum fueled by analyst upgrades and sector tailwinds, though trading near 52-week highs introduces valuation sensitivity.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MasTec (MTZ), an infrastructure engineering firm focused on communications, clean energy, power delivery, and pipelines primarily in North America, posted standout Q1 2026 figures. Revenue surged 34% to a quarterly record $3.83 billion, with adjusted EPS of $1.39 exceeding forecasts by 40%, propelled by clean energy and communications growth. Backlog hit an all-time high of $20.3 billion, up 65% year-over-year, highlighting demand in renewables and data centers. Full-year 2026 guidance was lifted to $17.5 billion revenue midpoint and $8.79 adjusted EPS. In recent market activity, shares have doubled year-to-date, with post-earnings gains reflecting improved margins (adjusted EBITDA up 73%) and organic growth over 30%, though higher beta signals elevated volatility.
MYRG Overview and Recent Performance
MYR Group (MYRG), a provider of electrical construction services through its Transmission & Distribution (T&D) and Commercial & Industrial segments in the U.S. and Canada, delivered impressive Q1 2026 performance. Revenue grew 20% to $1.0 billion, with diluted EPS of $2.99 topping estimates by 43% and gross margins expanding to 13.4% from favorable project mix and revisions. Backlog stood at $2.84 billion, supported by T&D transmission work and C&I data centers. The company affirmed 2026 organic growth around 12% near higher margin midpoints. Recent weeks have seen explosive gains, with shares up over 50% in the past month to new highs, driven by earnings momentum and reduced debt to $9.4 million, enhancing balance sheet strength amid grid modernization trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. These bots, powered by advanced financial learning models, achieve annualized returns up to 279%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0 in sectors like energy, semiconductors, and infrastructure. Only the most suitable for current conditions—such as momentum rotation in high-growth industrials—earn a spot in this dynamic section, with stats like 73% success rates and up to 192% gains in aerospace/defense highlighting their edge. Explore these varying styles, from swing trades to 60-minute agents, to align with your approach. Visit Trending AI Robots for real-time insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
EMCOR Group (EME), MasTec (MTZ), and MYR Group (MYRG) share exposure to electrical construction but diverge in business models: EME emphasizes mechanical/facilities services with broad U.S./U.K. reach, while MTZ and MYRG focus on T&D and C&I, with MTZ adding pipelines and clean energy diversity. Growth drivers include data centers and renewables for all, but MTZ's $20.3B backlog offers superior scale versus MYRG's $2.84B and EME's $15.62B RPO. Recent momentum favors MYRG (50%+ monthly) over MTZ (24%) and EME (20%), though MTZ leads YTD. Risks include labor shortages and project delays, with MTZ's higher beta (1.82) versus EME (1.17) and MYRG (1.30) amplifying volatility. Valuation sensitivity rises at current levels, but positive sentiment persists on infrastructure catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MTZ with higher probability due to its unmatched backlog growth, diversified revenue streams, and superior Q1 margin expansion amid clean energy and data center catalysts. While MYRG shows the strongest short-term trend consistency and EME offers stability via scale, MTZ's relative positioning suggests greater upside potential in the prevailing infrastructure environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and MYRG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- EME’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MYRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EME’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and MYRG’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EME’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MYRG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EME (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.15% , and MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated +6.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
EME is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-2.94% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| EME | MTZ | MYRG | |
| Capitalization | 40.6B | 32.8B | 7.28B |
| EBITDA | 2.02B | 1.22B | 266M |
| Gain YTD | 49.416 | 90.873 | 113.941 |
| P/E Ratio | 30.67 | 72.66 | 51.54 |
| Revenue | 17.7B | 15.3B | 3.83B |
| Total Cash | 916M | 274M | 163M |
| Total Debt | 510M | 3.02B | 61.5M |
EME | MTZ | MYRG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 83 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 5 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 58 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 36 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 25 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EME's Valuation (77) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (85) and is in the same range as MTZ (91). This means that EME's stock grew similarly to MYRG’s and similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (5) and is in the same range as EME (6). This means that MYRG's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
EME's SMR Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (42) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (58). This means that EME's stock grew similarly to MYRG’s and somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (36) and is in the same range as EME (39). This means that MYRG's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
EME's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (25) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MYRG (81). This means that EME's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and somewhat faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
| EME | MTZ | MYRG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 10 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BELT | 40.06 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF | |||
| DFEB | 50.08 | -0.13 | -0.26% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb | |||
| TOPT | 33.96 | -0.46 | -1.34% |
| iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF | |||
| FEZ | 64.95 | -1.39 | -2.10% |
| State Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF | |||
| MRNY | 15.93 | -0.44 | -2.69% |
| YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
EME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EME has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EME jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EME | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| FIX - EME | 79% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| MTZ - EME | 70% Closely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| MYRG - EME | 69% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| IESC - EME | 67% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| PWR - EME | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -4.57% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| MYRG - MTZ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 73% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| DY - MTZ | 68% Closely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||