Emerson Electric (EMR), Kennametal (KMT), and Lincoln Electric (LECO) represent three distinct players within the industrial tools and equipment space. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, business models, and relative positioning in the current market environment. The analysis is relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand performance differences among mid- to large-cap industrials, particularly those monitoring earnings trends, sector rotation, and valuation disparities in manufacturing-related equities.
Emerson Electric (EMR) provides automation solutions, measurement technologies, and software across process, hybrid, and discrete markets. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited volatility ahead of its fiscal third-quarter earnings release scheduled for August 4. Analysts project revenue growth supported by backlog levels, though margin pressures from costs remain a focal point. Sentiment has been shaped by upgrades highlighting order visibility and steady demand in key end markets during recent weeks.
Kennametal (KMT) specializes in tungsten carbide tooling, ceramics, and hard materials for metal cutting and wear applications. Recent stock performance reflects typical cyclical patterns in the tooling sector, with trading activity influenced by manufacturing output data and industrial production trends. Broader market conditions and end-market demand in aerospace and transportation have contributed to sentiment shifts over the past several weeks, resulting in measured price movements without pronounced directional catalysts.
Lincoln Electric (LECO) manufactures welding equipment, consumables, and automated solutions serving fabrication, construction, and energy sectors. The company recently reported second-quarter results that exceeded consensus estimates on both revenue and adjusted earnings per share, with organic sales growth noted across segments. This development supported positive sentiment and price appreciation in recent trading sessions, underscoring resilience in core end markets during the period.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform’s AI trading bots that have demonstrated suitability for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers, each employing unique strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics. Only those bots showing strong alignment with current trends and risk parameters are featured in the trending section. The page provides investors with transparent access to bot performance data, win rates, and drawdown statistics across diverse trading styles. Explore the full range of options on the Trending AI Robots page to identify bots that match specific market views.
Emerson Electric (EMR) emphasizes automation and digital solutions with relatively stable recurring revenue streams, contrasting with the more cyclical tooling focus of Kennametal (KMT) and the welding-centric model of Lincoln Electric (LECO). Growth drivers differ: EMR benefits from industrial automation trends, KMT from metal fabrication volumes, and LECO from infrastructure and fabrication demand. Recent momentum has favored LECO following its earnings beat, while EMR faces pre-earnings scrutiny and KMT reflects broader industrial cyclicality. Risk factors include exposure to raw material costs for all three, with valuation sensitivity varying—EMR often commands a premium multiple due to its software component, whereas KMT and LECO trade at more modest ratios. Sector exposure remains broadly similar within industrials, yet end-market diversification creates distinct sentiment responses to economic data releases.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, trend stability, and relative positioning within the industrial group, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic weighting to Lincoln Electric (LECO). The company’s demonstrated ability to exceed estimates and sustain order momentum provides a modest edge in the current environment, though outcomes remain contingent on broader economic indicators and ongoing earnings delivery across the peer set.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and LECO’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and LECO’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EMR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +5.63% price change this week, while KMT (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -2.47% , and LECO (@Tools & Hardware) price fluctuated +7.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +4.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.19%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +4.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.68%.
EMR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
KMT is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
LECO is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (+4.69% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| EMR | KMT | LECO | |
| Capitalization | 88.3B | 2.53B | 15.4B |
| EBITDA | 5.05B | 360M | 875M |
| Gain YTD | 20.185 | 17.825 | 18.392 |
| P/E Ratio | 34.63 | 7.50 | 28.20 |
| Revenue | 18.3B | 2.14B | 4.48B |
| Total Cash | 1.79B | 107M | 242M |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 660M | 1.15B |
EMR | KMT | LECO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 14 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 6 Undervalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 93 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 70 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 51 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 96 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 65 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMT's Valuation (6) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (35) in the Electrical Products industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for LECO (83) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that KMT's stock grew similarly to EMR’s and significantly faster than LECO’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (27) in the Electrical Products industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KMT (93) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that LECO's stock grew similarly to EMR’s and significantly faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's SMR Rating (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMR (64) in the Electrical Products industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KMT (70) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that LECO's stock grew somewhat faster than EMR’s and somewhat faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.
EMR's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as LECO (47) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is in the same range as KMT (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EMR's stock grew similarly to LECO’s and similarly to KMT’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (50) in the Electrical Products industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KMT (96) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that LECO's stock grew similarly to EMR’s and somewhat faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.
| EMR | KMT | LECO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 6 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 7 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 53% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMR has been closely correlated with ROK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMR jumps, then ROK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMR | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| ROK - EMR | 71% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| AME - EMR | 70% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| LECO - EMR | 69% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| KMT - EMR | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| NDSN - EMR | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMT has been closely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMT jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMT | 100% | -2.13% | ||
| HLIO - KMT | 70% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| MIDD - KMT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| TNC - KMT | 68% Closely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| SXI - KMT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| WTS - KMT | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.01% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LECO has been closely correlated with GGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LECO jumps, then GGG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LECO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LECO | 100% | +1.09% | ||
| GGG - LECO | 74% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| DOV - LECO | 73% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| DCI - LECO | 73% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ZWS - LECO | 70% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| FELE - LECO | 70% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||