Advertisement
EPRT or NTST or O
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Essential Properties Realty Trust (EPRT) vs. NetSTREIT (NTST) vs. Realty Income (O) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Essential Properties Realty Trust (EPRT), NetSTREIT (NTST), and Realty Income (O) are all net-lease real estate investment trusts (REITs) with exposure to retail and service-oriented properties.
- Recent weeks showed stable portfolio metrics across the group, with high occupancy rates and investment activity supporting dividend consistency.
- O maintains the largest scale and longest track record of monthly dividend growth, while EPRT and NTST demonstrate focused single-tenant strategies with varying market capitalizations.
- Relative performance reflected modest fluctuations tied to broader real estate sector sentiment and earnings releases in late July 2026.
- Valuation sensitivity remains elevated for all three due to interest rate environments and tenant credit quality.
- Market positioning highlights trade-offs between scale (O), growth-oriented acquisitions (EPRT), and specialized retail focus (NTST).
Introduction
Essential Properties Realty Trust (EPRT), NetSTREIT (NTST), and Realty Income (O) represent established players in the net-lease REIT sector. These stocks attract income-focused investors and traders seeking exposure to commercial real estate through long-term leases with creditworthy tenants. The comparison examines their business models, recent market activity, and relative positioning amid evolving interest rates and retail sector dynamics. Professional and retail investors monitoring dividend sustainability, acquisition pipelines, and sector rotation may find this analysis relevant for portfolio allocation decisions.
EPRT Overview and Recent Performance
Essential Properties Realty Trust (EPRT) operates as a single-tenant net-lease REIT, primarily investing in service-oriented and experience-based properties leased to middle-market tenants. In recent weeks, the stock exhibited modest fluctuations aligned with sector sentiment following second-quarter 2026 earnings. Portfolio metrics remained resilient, supported by high occupancy and new investments at attractive capitalization rates. Sentiment benefited from steady acquisition activity and dividend stability, though broader real estate valuation pressures influenced trading ranges. The company’s focus on smaller, essential tenants provides differentiation within the sector.
NTST Overview and Recent Performance
NetSTREIT (NTST) is a net-lease REIT concentrated on single-tenant retail properties, emphasizing diversified tenant relationships across various retail categories. Recent market activity reflected measured responses to quarterly results and ongoing portfolio optimization. High occupancy levels and disciplined capital allocation contributed to operational consistency. Performance in recent weeks mirrored peer movements amid sector-wide factors, with emphasis on maintaining balance sheet strength. The firm’s retail-centric strategy positions it for steady cash flow generation in a recovering consumer environment.
O Overview and Recent Performance
Realty Income (O), known as “The Monthly Dividend Company,” is the largest of the three, with a diversified portfolio of net-lease properties spanning retail, industrial, and other commercial assets. Recent weeks featured stable trading influenced by its scale and consistent dividend history. Second-quarter results highlighted continued investment activity and portfolio expansion. The stock’s performance reflected its status as a benchmark holding in the sector, with sentiment supported by long-term dividend growth and broad tenant diversification. Larger market capitalization provides relative liquidity compared to smaller peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers, yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current trends, risk parameters, and performance metrics earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, with many showing historical win rates between 55% and 75% or annualized returns varying by strategy. Users can explore detailed performance statistics, backtested results, and ticker-specific suitability before engaging. This resource provides traders with data-driven options for automated strategies. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for more details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The three REITs share net-lease business models but differ in scale and focus. O offers the broadest diversification and largest asset base, reducing single-tenant concentration risk relative to the more specialized portfolios of EPRT and NTST. Growth drivers center on acquisition pipelines for all, though EPRT emphasizes service-oriented tenants while NTST targets retail. Recent momentum showed comparable stability post-earnings, with limited differentiation in short-term price behavior. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity and tenant credit quality, more pronounced for smaller-capitalization names. Valuation metrics reflect sector norms, with dividend yields providing income appeal across the group. Market sentiment remains tied to macroeconomic indicators affecting commercial real estate.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as scale, dividend consistency, and portfolio stability, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Realty Income (O). Its established position and broader diversification may support more consistent trend characteristics in the current environment compared to the smaller peers. EPRT and NTST offer complementary exposure through focused strategies but exhibit relatively higher sensitivity to sector-specific catalysts. This assessment reflects pattern recognition from recent data rather than forward guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and O’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- EPRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- O’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and O’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- NTST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- O’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EPRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.11% price change this week, while NTST (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -3.54% , and O (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price fluctuated -2.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
NTST is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
O is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.70% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| EPRT | NTST | O | |
| Capitalization | 6.62B | 2.1B | 59.1B |
| EBITDA | 559M | 161M | 4.91B |
| Gain YTD | 5.427 | 19.880 | 14.287 |
| P/E Ratio | 23.74 | 147.79 | 45.63 |
| Revenue | 615M | 206M | 5.88B |
| Total Cash | 126M | 20M | N/A |
| Total Debt | 2.92B | 1.42B | 30.2B |
EPRT | NTST | O | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 57 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 94 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 91 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 53 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 89 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
O's Valuation (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EPRT (67) in the Real Estate Development industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NTST (89) in the null industry. This means that O's stock grew similarly to EPRT’s and somewhat faster than NTST’s over the last 12 months.
EPRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as O (70) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NTST (94) in the null industry. This means that EPRT's stock grew similarly to O’s and somewhat faster than NTST’s over the last 12 months.
EPRT's SMR Rating (83) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as O (89) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry, and is in the same range as NTST (91) in the null industry. This means that EPRT's stock grew similarly to O’s and similarly to NTST’s over the last 12 months.
O's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NTST (53) in the null industry, and is in the same range as EPRT (58) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that O's stock grew similarly to NTST’s and similarly to EPRT’s over the last 12 months.
EPRT's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as O (72) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry, and is in the same range as NTST (89) in the null industry. This means that EPRT's stock grew similarly to O’s and similarly to NTST’s over the last 12 months.
| EPRT | NTST | O | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 34% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 55% | 17 days ago 58% | 28 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 36% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UBRL | 15.76 | 1.79 | +12.83% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF | |||
| RFG | 63.11 | 1.53 | +2.49% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | |||
| FRNW | 22.94 | 0.28 | +1.24% |
| Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | |||
| DFGX | 52.58 | 0.11 | +0.21% |
| Dimensional International Cr Fxd Inc ETF | |||
| QQUP | 60.17 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | |||
EPRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPRT has been closely correlated with EPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPRT jumps, then EPR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPRT | 100% | N/A | ||
| EPR - EPRT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| ADC - EPRT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| FCPT - EPRT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| NNN - EPRT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| EGP - EPRT | 67% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
More | ||||
NTST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTST has been loosely correlated with O. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTST jumps, then O could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTST | 100% | -1.62% | ||
| O - NTST | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| DBRG - NTST | 63% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ADC - NTST | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| NNN - NTST | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| EPRT - NTST | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||