FAF
Price
$67.03
Change
+$1.13 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.58B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FDP
Price
$29.52
Change
+$0.14 (+0.48%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.4B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FDS
Price
$255.57
Change
+$0.55 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.29B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAF or FDP or FDS

Header iconFAF vs FDP vs FDS Comparison
Open Charts FAF vs FDP vs FDSBanner chart's image
FAF vs FDP vs FDS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2026
Stock price -- (FAF: $65.90FDP: $29.37FDS: $255.02)
Brand notoriety: FAF, FDP and FDS are all not notable
FAF represents the Specialty Insurance industry, FDP is part of the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry, and FDS is in the Financial Publishing/Services industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAF: 75%, FDP: 151%, FDS: 99%
Market capitalization -- FAF: $6.58B, FDP: $1.4B, FDS: $9.29B
FAF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $6.58B. FDP’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $1.4B. FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] has a market capitalization of $9.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $12.39B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $40.18B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $124.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.53B. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $5.01B. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $38.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFDP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and FDS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FDP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the long-term than FDP, which in turn is a better option than FAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and FDS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FDP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than FAF and FDP.

Price Growth

FAF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while FDP (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -12.56% , and FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) price fluctuated +7.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.89%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +9.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.99%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -3.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAF is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

FDP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

FDS is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+1.51% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+9.28% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-3.98% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDS($9.29B) has a higher market cap than FAF($6.58B) and FDP($1.4B). FDP has higher P/E ratio than FDS and FAF: FDP (20.26) vs FDS (16.41) and FAF (10.14). FAF YTD gains are higher at: 8.139 vs. FDS (-11.235) and FDP (-16.216). FDP has less debt than FAF and FDS: FDP (349M) vs FAF (1.29B) and FDS (1.55B). FAF has higher revenues than FDP and FDS: FAF (7.7B) vs FDP (4.27B) and FDS (2.4B).
FAFFDPFDS
Capitalization6.58B1.4B9.29B
EBITDAN/A191M978M
Gain YTD8.139-16.216-11.235
P/E Ratio10.1420.2616.41
Revenue7.7B4.27B2.4B
Total CashN/AN/A28.9M
Total Debt1.29B349M1.55B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAF vs FDP vs FDS: Fundamental Ratings
FAF
FDP
FDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100100
SMR RATING
1..100
778935
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
578451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
981392
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDP's Valuation (11) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FDS (16) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry, and is in the same range as FAF (17) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that FDP's stock grew similarly to FDS’s and similarly to FAF’s over the last 12 months.

FAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as FDP (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry, and is in the same range as FDS (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that FAF's stock grew similarly to FDP’s and similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (35) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAF (77) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FDP (89) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FDS's stock grew somewhat faster than FAF’s and somewhat faster than FDP’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FAF (57) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FDP (84) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FDS's stock grew similarly to FAF’s and somewhat faster than FDP’s over the last 12 months.

FDP's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDS (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FAF (98) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that FDP's stock grew significantly faster than FDS’s and significantly faster than FAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAFFDPFDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FDP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWIN19.240.47
+2.50%
The Baldwin Insurance Group Inc.
FRBA15.660.32
+2.09%
First Bank
APWC1.37N/A
N/A
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd
FERAU10.54N/A
N/A
Fifth Era Acquisition Corp I
ALV130.34-0.08
-0.06%
Autoliv

FAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAF has been closely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAF jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAF
1D Price
Change %
FAF100%
+2.04%
FNF - FAF
80%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
NMIH - FAF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
ESNT - FAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
ITIC - FAF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
AIZ - FAF
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
+0.62%
MORN - FDS
74%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
SPGI - FDS
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
MCO - FDS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
HLI - FDS
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
SCHW - FDS
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More