Advertisement
FORM or LRCX or TER
FORM | LRCX | TER | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 35 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 29 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 18 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 21 | 13 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 9 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 90 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TER's Valuation (76) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as FORM (77) and is in the same range as LRCX (85). This means that TER's stock grew similarly to FORM’s and similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.
TER's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LRCX (29) and is in the same range as FORM (37). This means that TER's stock grew similarly to LRCX’s and similarly to FORM’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's SMR Rating (18) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as TER (28) and is somewhat better than the same rating for FORM (67). This means that LRCX's stock grew similarly to TER’s and somewhat faster than FORM’s over the last 12 months.
TER's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LRCX (21) and is in the same range as FORM (35). This means that TER's stock grew similarly to LRCX’s and similarly to FORM’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as FORM (13) and is in the same range as TER (25). This means that LRCX's stock grew similarly to FORM’s and similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.
| FORM | LRCX | TER | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FORM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while LRCX’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and TER’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).
- FORM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LRCX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- TER’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FORM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TER’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FORM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LRCX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TER’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FORM (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -6.37% price change this week, while LRCX (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +0.30% , and TER (@Electronic Production Equipment) price fluctuated +2.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
FORM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
LRCX is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
TER is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-1.01% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
Advertisement
FORM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with COHU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then COHU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORM | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| COHU - FORM | 76% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| RMBS - FORM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| AMAT - FORM | 74% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| NVMI - FORM | 74% Closely correlated | -4.24% | ||
| SLAB - FORM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||