FTXL
Price
$264.03
Change
+$19.65 (+8.04%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
2.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXQ
Price
$103.70
Change
+$7.62 (+7.93%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
2.51B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXX
Price
$586.93
Change
+$45.42 (+8.39%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
38.68B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTXL or SOXQ or SOXX

Header iconFTXL vs SOXQ vs SOXX Comparison
Open Charts FTXL vs SOXQ vs SOXXBanner chart's image
FTXL vs SOXQ vs SOXX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) vs. Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) vs. iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)

Key Takeaways

  • FTXL employs a smart beta strategy via the Nasdaq US Smart Semiconductor Index, emphasizing factors like value, volatility, and growth for potentially enhanced risk-adjusted returns, with ~35 holdings and a 0.60% expense ratio.
  • SOXQ and SOXX are passive, market-cap weighted ETFs tracking semiconductor indexes (PHLX and NYSE, respectively), offering concentrated exposure to ~30-31 top U.S.-listed semiconductor firms at lower costs of 0.19% and 0.34%.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly (e.g., NVDA, MU, AVGO, INTC), with sector allocations ~80% semiconductors and ~20% equipment across all three.
  • SOXX boasts superior liquidity with $33.8B AUM; SOXQ provides cost efficiency; FTXL offers modest diversification depth but higher fees.
  • All exhibit elevated volatility due to sector concentration, with recent performance driven by AI demand but differentiated by weighting methodologies.
  • Cap-weighted funds (SOXQ, SOXX) amplify mega-cap momentum, while FTXL's factor tilt may reduce drawdowns in rotations.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the semiconductor sector—critical for AI, data centers, and digital infrastructure—often compare FTXL, SOXQ, and SOXX. These ETFs target U.S.-listed semiconductor companies but differ strategically: FTXL uses a smart beta (factor-based) approach for multi-dimensional selection and weighting, while SOXQ and SOXX passively track modified market-cap weighted indexes focused on the 30 largest firms. This comparison is timely amid surging AI chip demand and sector growth projections nearing $1 trillion in 2026 sales, highlighting trade-offs in costs, concentration, and factor tilts within a high-volatility theme.

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) Overview

The First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) tracks the Nasdaq US Smart Semiconductor Index, a factor-weighted benchmark selecting liquid U.S. semiconductor stocks based on value, volatility, and growth metrics (smart beta strategy). It holds approximately 35 stocks, with top holdings including INTC (~12-14%), MU (~7-9%), AVGO (~7%), QCOM (~7%), and NVDA (~6-7%). Sector allocation is nearly 100% technology, primarily semiconductors. The expense ratio is 0.60%. Launched in 2016, FTXL rebalances periodically to maintain factor exposures, distinguishing it as a smart beta fund rather than pure cap-weighting, potentially aiding diversification in volatile cycles.

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) Overview

The Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, a modified market-cap weighted index of the 30 largest U.S.-listed semiconductor companies engaged in design, manufacturing, and sales. It holds 31 stocks, with top holdings: NVDA (9.98%), MU (9.92%), AVGO (9.22%), INTC (7.50%), AMD (6.23%). Sector breakdown: 79.97% semiconductors, 20.03% production technology equipment. Expense ratio: 0.19%. Inception: June 2021. Rebalanced quarterly (March, June, September, December) and reconstituted annually in September, this passive ETF emphasizes mega-cap leaders for efficient sector replication.

iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) Overview

The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index, comprising U.S.-listed equities in the semiconductor sector. It holds 30 stocks, led by MU (9.77%), AMD (9.15%), INTC (7.39%), AVGO (7.26%), NVDA (6.55%). Allocation: 80.56% semiconductors, 19.33% semiconductor equipment. Expense ratio: 0.34%. Launched July 2001, this passive, cap-weighted fund covers the semiconductor value chain with high liquidity ($33.8B AUM) and quarterly distributions.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The semiconductor sector faces a transformative environment, with global sales projected to hit $975 billion in 2026 (26% growth), driven by AI infrastructure demand expected to claim half of revenues via generative AI chips and data centers. Capital expenditures by cloud providers are surging (up 40% YoY to $600B), fueling wafer fab equipment (WFE) and supply chain investments, though profitability pressures arise from high capex. Macro drivers include AI/HPC adoption, automotive electrification, and digitalization, tempered by geopolitical tensions (e.g., U.S. export controls, now eased on AI chips), trade frictions, and supply constraints. Regulatory shifts promote onshoring via CHIPS Act subsidies, while Europe lags due to stringent rules. Earnings trends favor AI leaders, but sector risks encompass cyclical downturns, talent shortages, and inflation in energy/power infrastructure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, all three ETFs have surged on AI tailwinds, with year-to-date gains around 67-87%, reflecting sector strength. FTXL has occasionally outperformed (e.g., higher YTD in rotations), thanks to factor tilts boosting value/growth balance and softening drawdowns versus cap-weighted peers. SOXQ and SOXX track closely, amplifying mega-cap momentum (NVDA, AVGO) but heightening concentration risk. Volatility is elevated across the board (betas >1.6, std dev ~36% over 6M), with similar drawdowns (~46%), tied to earnings cycles and rates sensitivity. FTXL's methodology explains relative stability in volatile periods, while cap-weighted funds lead in sustained uptrends; all show trend consistency amid AI buildout but diverge on rotations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic sectors like semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors SOXQ with high probability (~70%) due to its lowest expense ratio (0.19%), efficient tracking of a concentrated benchmark, and balanced cost-momentum profile in AI-driven uptrends. SOXX offers unmatched liquidity for institutions, while FTXL's smart beta suits volatility mitigation. This positioning optimizes risk-adjusted returns amid sustained sector growth, absent personal advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXX has more net assets: 38.7B vs. SOXQ (2.51B) and FTXL (2.42B). FTXL has a higher annual dividend yield than SOXX and SOXQ: FTXL (103.847) vs SOXX (95.016) and SOXQ (86.160). FTXL was incepted earlier than SOXQ and SOXX: FTXL (10 years) vs SOXQ (5 years) and SOXX (25 years). SOXQ (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SOXX (0.34) and FTXL (0.60). SOXX has a higher turnover SOXQ (24.00) and FTXL (19.00) vs SOXQ (24.00) and FTXL (19.00).
FTXLSOXQSOXX
Gain YTD103.84786.16095.016
Net Assets2.42B2.51B38.7B
Total Expense Ratio0.600.190.34
Turnover19.0024.0027.00
Yield0.130.280.29
Fund Existence10 years5 years25 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTXLSOXQSOXX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROKT124.368.55
+7.38%
Stt Strt® SPDR® S&PKenshoFnlFrntrsETF
EDIV41.560.96
+2.36%
State Street® SPDR® S&P Em Mkts Div ETF
WCAP9.340.13
+1.42%
Warcap Unconstrained Equity ETF
USML43.72N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Mn Vl Fct TR ETN
LCO25.27N/A
N/A
LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF

FTXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTXL
1D Price
Change %
FTXL100%
+8.04%
LRCX - FTXL
85%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AMAT - FTXL
82%
Closely correlated
+11.19%
MPWR - FTXL
81%
Closely correlated
+7.91%
KLAC - FTXL
80%
Closely correlated
+12.92%
MU - FTXL
78%
Closely correlated
+11.66%
More

SOXQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXQ
1D Price
Change %
SOXQ100%
+7.93%
LRCX - SOXQ
85%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AMAT - SOXQ
82%
Closely correlated
+11.19%
KLAC - SOXQ
81%
Closely correlated
+12.92%
MPWR - SOXQ
81%
Closely correlated
+7.91%
MKSI - SOXQ
80%
Closely correlated
+9.25%
More

SOXX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXX has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXX jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXX
1D Price
Change %
SOXX100%
+8.39%
LRCX - SOXX
86%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AMAT - SOXX
83%
Closely correlated
+11.19%
KLAC - SOXX
81%
Closely correlated
+12.92%
MPWR - SOXX
80%
Closely correlated
+7.91%
ASML - SOXX
77%
Closely correlated
+9.53%
More