Advertisement
FUTU or HUT or IBKR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Futu Holdings (FUTU) vs. Hut 8 (HUT) vs. Interactive Brokers (IBKR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FUTU has experienced significant recent volatility tied to regulatory developments in its primary market, leading to sharp price corrections in recent weeks.
- HUT has shown strong momentum driven by its expansion into AI data centers alongside its core Bitcoin mining operations, with notable year-to-date gains.
- IBKR continues to deliver steady performance as a global electronic brokerage, supported by consistent revenue growth and client activity metrics.
- Business models differ markedly: FUTU and IBKR focus on online brokerage and wealth management, while HUT operates in cryptocurrency mining and digital infrastructure.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs between high-growth volatility in HUT and FUTU versus the more stable positioning of IBKR in the current environment.
- Sector exposures include financial technology and brokerage for two names, contrasted with crypto and AI infrastructure for the third.
Introduction
Traders and investors often compare FUTU, HUT, and IBKR to evaluate opportunities across online brokerage platforms and digital asset infrastructure. These stocks represent distinct approaches within financial services and emerging technology sectors. The comparison appeals to active traders seeking relative performance insights, growth-oriented investors monitoring sector rotation, and those assessing risk-adjusted positioning amid evolving market conditions. Analysis focuses on observable business fundamentals, recent price behavior, and broader contextual factors.
FUTU Overview and Recent Performance
FUTU operates as Futu Holdings Limited, a technology-driven online brokerage and wealth management platform primarily serving retail investors through digital applications. Recent market activity has featured notable volatility, with the stock experiencing a substantial decline amid regulatory announcements concerning its operations. Broader performance over recent weeks reflects sensitivity to developments in its key geographic markets, influencing overall sentiment. Client asset growth and trading volumes had previously supported stronger results, though current positioning shows contraction in share price relative to earlier periods in the year.
HUT Overview and Recent Performance
HUT is Hut 8 Corp., a company engaged in Bitcoin mining and the development of digital infrastructure, including high-performance computing and AI data centers. Recent performance has been characterized by upward momentum, supported by revenue expansion in compute services and progress on large-scale lease agreements. In recent weeks, the stock has maintained strength amid its strategic shift toward power and infrastructure opportunities, despite quarterly results that included significant non-cash items. Sentiment has benefited from contracted revenue visibility in the AI-related segment.
IBKR Overview and Recent Performance
IBKR is Interactive Brokers Group, Inc., a global electronic brokerage providing direct-access trading across multiple asset classes to active traders and institutions. Recent performance has remained resilient, with continued growth in key operating metrics such as commissions and client balances. Over recent weeks, the stock has reflected steady demand for its platform amid broader market participation. The company’s focus on cost efficiency and execution quality has contributed to consistent positioning relative to peers in the brokerage sector.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of its AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the highest-performing and most suitable ones earn placement in this trending section. Available bots demonstrate a range of metrics, including annualized returns reaching up to +227%, win rates between 70–80%, and profit factors up to 2.5–3.0 or higher across various sectors such as technology and energy. Each bot features distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets. Explore the full selection at Trending AI Robots to review options aligned with individual objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The three companies diverge in core business models, with FUTU and IBKR centered on brokerage services and client asset management, while HUT emphasizes cryptocurrency mining and AI infrastructure development. Growth drivers for FUTU include trading volumes and funded accounts, for HUT center on data center leases and compute revenue, and for IBKR stem from execution volumes and margin interest. Recent momentum has favored HUT on infrastructure catalysts, contrasted with pressure on FUTU from external regulatory factors and relative stability for IBKR. Risk factors include regulatory exposure for FUTU, commodity price and development execution for HUT, and market-wide trading activity sensitivity for IBKR. Valuation sensitivity appears higher for growth-oriented names amid shifting sentiment, while sector exposure positions HUT toward digital assets and infrastructure versus pure financial services for the other two.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probability to IBKR among the three. Its steadier revenue trajectory and lower recent volatility provide a more consistent profile compared to the regulatory influences affecting FUTU or the infrastructure transition underway at HUT. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to current market data rather than forward guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and IBKR’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- FUTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IBKR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUTU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and IBKR’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUTU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IBKR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FUTU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.26% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.97% , and IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price fluctuated +2.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUTU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
HUT is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.
IBKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.51% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| FUTU | HUT | IBKR | |
| Capitalization | 13.4B | 13.1B | 39.6B |
| EBITDA | 14.9B | -287.41M | 9.42B |
| Gain YTD | -40.892 | 153.159 | 38.415 |
| P/E Ratio | 10.54 | 28.26 | 38.12 |
| Revenue | 24B | 284M | 10.6B |
| Total Cash | 23.6B | 160M | 5.09B |
| Total Debt | 22.5B | 423M | 12M |
FUTU | HUT | IBKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 85 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 93 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 40 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 98 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 34 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 2 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUTU's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUT (93) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for IBKR (94) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FUTU's stock grew significantly faster than HUT’s and significantly faster than IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HUT (40) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FUTU (100) in the null industry. This means that IBKR's stock grew similarly to HUT’s and significantly faster than FUTU’s over the last 12 months.
FUTU's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as IBKR (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HUT (98) in the null industry. This means that FUTU's stock grew similarly to IBKR’s and somewhat faster than HUT’s over the last 12 months.
HUT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as IBKR (40) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FUTU (88) in the null industry. This means that HUT's stock grew similarly to IBKR’s and somewhat faster than FUTU’s over the last 12 months.
HUT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as IBKR (24) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FUTU (91) in the null industry. This means that HUT's stock grew similarly to IBKR’s and significantly faster than FUTU’s over the last 12 months.
| FUTU | HUT | IBKR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 10 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
Advertisement
HUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUT | 100% | +10.05% | ||
| CIFR - HUT | 79% Closely correlated | +7.61% | ||
| RIOT - HUT | 75% Closely correlated | +8.55% | ||
| CLSK - HUT | 71% Closely correlated | +8.39% | ||
| COIN - HUT | 71% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
| IREN - HUT | 68% Closely correlated | +10.01% | ||
More | ||||
IBKR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBKR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR | 100% | +3.99% | ||
| HOOD - IBKR | 67% Closely correlated | +6.80% | ||
| RJF - IBKR | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| MS - IBKR | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| GS - IBKR | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.43% | ||
| SCHW - IBKR | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||