The 10-day moving average for HUBS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 11 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HUBS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
The Aroon Indicator for HUBS entered a downward trend on October 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HUBS as a result. In 76 of 97 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HUBS just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where HUBS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 41 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
HUBS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +7.97% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HUBS advanced for three days, in 231 of 316 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. HUBS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 73 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.105) is normal, around the industry mean (51.922). P/E Ratio (72.185) is within average values for comparable stocks, (82.636). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.247) is also within normal values, averaging (3.135). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.618) is also within normal values, averaging (70.810).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HUBS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
MANH moved above its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 27 of 35 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MANH as a result. In 63 of 92 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MANH just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where MANH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 37 of 53 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The 10-day moving average for MANH crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Following a +8.70% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MANH advanced for three days, in 238 of 347 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MANH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
MANH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for MANH entered a downward trend on October 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 14 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MANH’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MANH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 91 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (74.627) is normal, around the industry mean (51.922). P/E Ratio (57.865) is within average values for comparable stocks, (82.636). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.566) is also within normal values, averaging (3.135). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (11.338) is also within normal values, averaging (70.810).
The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 10-day moving average for TTAN crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 11, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 3 of 4 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TTAN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
TTAN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for TTAN entered a downward trend on September 29, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where TTAN's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 12 of 13 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 23, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TTAN as a result. In 15 of 23 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TTAN just turned positive on September 29, 2026. Looking at past instances where TTAN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 11 of 14 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +6.06% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TTAN advanced for three days, in 76 of 105 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 41 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.600) is normal, around the industry mean (51.922). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (82.636). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.135). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.211) is also within normal values, averaging (70.810).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. TTAN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TTAN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
HUBS | MANH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBS's Valuation (73) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MANH (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's SMR Rating (14) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (76) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | MANH | TTAN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 3 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 9 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 85% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MANH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TTAN’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TTAN’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.05% price change this week, while MANH (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.76% , and TTAN (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +4.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.08%.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
MANH is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OXT.X | 0.009531 | 0.000348 | +3.79% |
| Orchid cryptocurrency | |||
| BLUR.X | 0.010712 | 0.000337 | +3.25% |
| Blur cryptocurrency | |||
| DAI.X | 1.000979 | 0.001168 | +0.12% |
| Dai cryptocurrency | |||
| DYDX.X | 0.122415 | -0.005245 | -4.11% |
| dYdX cryptocurrency | |||
| UNFI.X | 0.029114 | -0.003907 | -11.83% |
| Unifi Protocol DAO cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | +5.60% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 76% Closely correlated | +4.57% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 74% Closely correlated | +6.22% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | +6.09% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | +6.14% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | +3.04% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MANH has been closely correlated with BLKB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MANH jumps, then BLKB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MANH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANH | 100% | +3.14% | ||
| BLKB - MANH | 67% Closely correlated | +5.18% | ||
| WDAY - MANH | 67% Closely correlated | +4.16% | ||
| PCTY - MANH | 67% Closely correlated | +4.49% | ||
| DOCU - MANH | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.04% | ||
| ADBE - MANH | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.57% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been loosely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAN | 100% | +4.70% | ||
| NOW - TTAN | 65% Loosely correlated | +6.14% | ||
| BRZE - TTAN | 64% Loosely correlated | +7.54% | ||
| CRM - TTAN | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.57% | ||
| FRSH - TTAN | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.09% | ||
| ASAN - TTAN | 56% Loosely correlated | +6.22% | ||
More | ||||