IONQ
Price
$49.31
Change
-$1.25 (-2.47%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
18.41B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QBTS
Price
$22.76
Change
+$0.85 (+3.88%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.43B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QMCO
Price
$11.65
Change
-$1.28 (-9.90%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
459.11M
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IONQ or QBTS or QMCO

IONQ vs QBTS vs QMCO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) vs. D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) vs. Quantum Corporation (QMCO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • IONQ leads with robust Q1 2026 revenue growth of 755% year-over-year to $64.7 million and raised full-year guidance to $260–$270 million, driving positive sentiment.
  • QBTS shows strong 1-year return of 116.60% but trails YTD at 13.69%, bolstered by acquisitions like Quantum Circuits Inc. and analyst endorsements.
  • QMCO tops YTD performance at 49.15% amid data storage demand, though its smaller market cap of $141 million reflects higher relative risk.
  • All three stocks operate in data-intensive tech spaces with quantum ties, but IONQ and QBTS exhibit higher volatility tied to quantum computing hype.
  • Recent momentum favors QMCO YTD, while IONQ demonstrates superior revenue scale and partnerships.

Introduction

This comparison examines IONQ, QBTS, and QMCO—publicly traded companies at the intersection of quantum technology and data management. Investors interested in emerging quantum computing and high-performance storage solutions will find value here, as these stocks reflect sector trends like AI-driven data demands and quantum advancements. Amid recent market volatility, their relative performance highlights trade-offs in growth potential, risk, and commercial traction, aiding decisions on stock comparison and market positioning.

IONQ Overview and Recent Performance

IONQ, or IonQ, Inc., develops trapped-ion quantum computing systems accessible via cloud platforms like AWS Braket and Azure Quantum. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $49, with a YTD return of 9.74% and 1-year gain of 54.65%. Sentiment has been influenced by record Q1 2026 revenue of $64.7 million, up 755% year-over-year, prompting raised full-year guidance to $260–$270 million. Key developments include a merger with SkyWater Technology and deployments like Europe's largest quantum key distribution network, enhancing its position despite high volatility (beta around 3.05).

QBTS Overview and Recent Performance

QBTS, D-Wave Quantum Inc., specializes in annealing quantum computers and hybrid solvers via its Leap cloud service for optimization problems in logistics and drug discovery. The stock recently closed near $22.57, posting a YTD return of 13.69% and impressive 1-year return of 116.60%. Recent weeks saw gains amid acquisitions like Quantum Circuits Inc. and endorsements from figures like Jim Cramer, though it faced pullbacks in broader quantum sell-offs. Performance reflects commercial momentum, with upcoming Q1 2026 earnings on May 12 fueling interest.

QMCO Overview and Recent Performance

QMCO, Quantum Corporation, delivers scale-out storage and data protection solutions for unstructured data and video, including ActiveScale object storage and DXi backup appliances. Trading around $9.62, it leads YTD at 49.15% but shows a modest 1-year return of 15.98%. Recent activity includes analyst upgrades to Outperform with $13 targets, driven by AI-related storage demand. With a smaller $141 million market cap, its performance ties to enterprise data growth rather than pure quantum hype, offering relative stability in recent volatility.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selected for their ability to outperform in current market conditions using momentum, sector rotation, and machine learning. These bots trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto with diverse strategies like short-term pattern recognition (5-60 minute timeframes), hedging via inverse ETFs, and multi-ticker portfolios. Stats highlight annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 50-88%, and profit factors to 11.70, targeting sectors like semiconductors, space, and data centers. Timeframes vary for day trading to swing, with low drawdowns via take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Explore these for tailored, data-driven signals in today’s dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

IONQ and QBTS focus on quantum hardware/software—trapped-ion gate-model vs. annealing—while QMCO emphasizes classical storage with quantum-adjacent security partnerships. Growth drivers differ: IONQ’s revenue scale ($130M TTM) and cloud integrations outpace QBTS’s niche optimization ($25M TTM) and QMCO’s $263M from data services. Recent momentum shows QMCO leading YTD (49%), QBTS 1-year (117%), but high betas (2.9+ for IONQ/QBTS) signal risks vs. QMCO’s steadier profile. Valuation sensitivity is acute for quantum pure-plays amid losses; sentiment favors IONQ’s catalysts like mergers over QBTS practicality and QMCO’s earnings stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IONQ due to trend consistency from explosive Q1 growth, raised guidance, and partnerships signaling stronger relative positioning. While QBTS offers commercialization edge and QMCO YTD momentum, IONQ’s revenue trajectory and backlog provide higher probability of sustained outperformance in quantum/data sectors.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2026
Stock price -- (IONQ: $49.31QBTS: $22.76QMCO: $11.66)
Brand notoriety: IONQ, QBTS and QMCO are all not notable
The three companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IONQ: 212%, QBTS: 88%, QMCO: 203%
Market capitalization -- IONQ: $18.41B, QBTS: $8.43B, QMCO: $459.11M
$IONQ is valued at $18.41B, while QBTS has a market capitalization of $8.43B, and QMCO's market capitalization is $459.11M. The market cap for tickers in this @Computer Processing Hardware ranges from $258.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Computer Processing Hardware industry is $25.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IONQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and QMCO’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IONQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QMCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IONQ is a better buy in the long-term than QMCO, which in turn is a better option than QBTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IONQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and QMCO’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IONQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QBTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QMCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IONQ is a better buy in the short-term than QMCO, which in turn is a better option than QBTS.

Price Growth

IONQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -12.80% price change this week, while QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -7.82% , and QMCO (@Computer Processing Hardware) price fluctuated -25.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -10.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

IONQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

QBTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

QMCO is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (-10.98% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IONQ($18.4B) has a higher market cap than QBTS($8.43B) and QMCO($459M). QMCO YTD gains are higher at: 80.775 vs. IONQ (9.895) and QBTS (-12.964). QMCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -68.8M vs. QBTS (-386.5M) and IONQ (-710.97M). IONQ has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. QBTS (588M) and QMCO (13.2M). IONQ has less debt than QBTS and QMCO: IONQ (30.4M) vs QBTS (46.8M) and QMCO (137M). QMCO has higher revenues than IONQ and QBTS: QMCO (263M) vs IONQ (187M) and QBTS (12.4M).
IONQQBTSQMCO
Capitalization18.4B8.43B459M
EBITDA-710.97M-386.5M-68.8M
Gain YTD9.895-12.96480.775
P/E Ratio149.54N/AN/A
Revenue187M12.4M263M
Total Cash2.03B588M13.2M
Total Debt30.4M46.8M137M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QMCO: Fundamental Ratings
QMCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IONQQBTSQMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IONQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QBTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QMCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETOR40.732.66
+6.99%
Etoro Group Ltd
INBS2.250.10
+4.65%
Intelligent Bio Solutions Inc.
BHB39.071.52
+4.05%
Bar Harbor Bankshares
FOX45.891.50
+3.38%
Fox Corp
LAKE10.950.13
+1.20%
Lakeland Industries

QBTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBTS
1D Price
Change %
QBTS100%
+3.88%
RGTI - QBTS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
QUBT - QBTS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
IONQ - QBTS
81%
Closely correlated
-2.47%
QMCO - QBTS
51%
Loosely correlated
-9.82%
CAN - QBTS
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
More

QMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMCO has been loosely correlated with QUBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMCO jumps, then QUBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QMCO
1D Price
Change %
QMCO100%
-9.82%
QUBT - QMCO
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
RGTI - QMCO
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
QBTS - QMCO
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.88%
IONQ - QMCO
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
AGMH - QMCO
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
More