This comparison examines IONQ, QBTS, and QMCO—publicly traded companies at the intersection of quantum technology and data management. Investors interested in emerging quantum computing and high-performance storage solutions will find value here, as these stocks reflect sector trends like AI-driven data demands and quantum advancements. Amid recent market volatility, their relative performance highlights trade-offs in growth potential, risk, and commercial traction, aiding decisions on stock comparison and market positioning.
IONQ, or IonQ, Inc., develops trapped-ion quantum computing systems accessible via cloud platforms like AWS Braket and Azure Quantum. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $49, with a YTD return of 9.74% and 1-year gain of 54.65%. Sentiment has been influenced by record Q1 2026 revenue of $64.7 million, up 755% year-over-year, prompting raised full-year guidance to $260–$270 million. Key developments include a merger with SkyWater Technology and deployments like Europe's largest quantum key distribution network, enhancing its position despite high volatility (beta around 3.05).
QBTS, D-Wave Quantum Inc., specializes in annealing quantum computers and hybrid solvers via its Leap cloud service for optimization problems in logistics and drug discovery. The stock recently closed near $22.57, posting a YTD return of 13.69% and impressive 1-year return of 116.60%. Recent weeks saw gains amid acquisitions like Quantum Circuits Inc. and endorsements from figures like Jim Cramer, though it faced pullbacks in broader quantum sell-offs. Performance reflects commercial momentum, with upcoming Q1 2026 earnings on May 12 fueling interest.
QMCO, Quantum Corporation, delivers scale-out storage and data protection solutions for unstructured data and video, including ActiveScale object storage and DXi backup appliances. Trading around $9.62, it leads YTD at 49.15% but shows a modest 1-year return of 15.98%. Recent activity includes analyst upgrades to Outperform with $13 targets, driven by AI-related storage demand. With a smaller $141 million market cap, its performance ties to enterprise data growth rather than pure quantum hype, offering relative stability in recent volatility.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selected for their ability to outperform in current market conditions using momentum, sector rotation, and machine learning. These bots trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto with diverse strategies like short-term pattern recognition (5-60 minute timeframes), hedging via inverse ETFs, and multi-ticker portfolios. Stats highlight annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 50-88%, and profit factors to 11.70, targeting sectors like semiconductors, space, and data centers. Timeframes vary for day trading to swing, with low drawdowns via take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Explore these for tailored, data-driven signals in today’s dynamic markets.
IONQ and QBTS focus on quantum hardware/software—trapped-ion gate-model vs. annealing—while QMCO emphasizes classical storage with quantum-adjacent security partnerships. Growth drivers differ: IONQ’s revenue scale ($130M TTM) and cloud integrations outpace QBTS’s niche optimization ($25M TTM) and QMCO’s $263M from data services. Recent momentum shows QMCO leading YTD (49%), QBTS 1-year (117%), but high betas (2.9+ for IONQ/QBTS) signal risks vs. QMCO’s steadier profile. Valuation sensitivity is acute for quantum pure-plays amid losses; sentiment favors IONQ’s catalysts like mergers over QBTS practicality and QMCO’s earnings stability.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors IONQ due to trend consistency from explosive Q1 growth, raised guidance, and partnerships signaling stronger relative positioning. While QBTS offers commercialization edge and QMCO YTD momentum, IONQ’s revenue trajectory and backlog provide higher probability of sustained outperformance in quantum/data sectors.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IONQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and QMCO’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IONQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and QMCO’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
IONQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +1.88% price change this week, while QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -2.01% , and QMCO (@Computer Processing Hardware) price fluctuated +8.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.36%.
IONQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
QBTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| IONQ | QBTS | QMCO | |
| Capitalization | 21.6B | 8.66B | 201M |
| EBITDA | -710.97M | -386.5M | -68.8M |
| Gain YTD | 28.928 | -10.631 | 113.023 |
| P/E Ratio | 148.33 | N/A | N/A |
| Revenue | 187M | 12.4M | 263M |
| Total Cash | 2.03B | 588M | 13.2M |
| Total Debt | 30.4M | 46.8M | 137M |
QMCO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IONQ | QBTS | QMCO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 83% | 18 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMCO has been loosely correlated with QUBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMCO jumps, then QUBT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMCO | 100% | +5.21% | ||
| QUBT - QMCO | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| RGTI - QMCO | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| QBTS - QMCO | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| IONQ - QMCO | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| AGMH - QMCO | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||