Comparing First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP), ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND), and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) highlights diverse approaches to consumer-driven growth. XLY provides passive, market-cap-weighted exposure to the broad U.S. consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500, capturing established giants in retail, autos, and leisure. In contrast, ISHP and OND represent thematic strategies: ISHP targets global e-commerce enablers like online platforms and logistics, while OND focuses on on-demand services spanning digital media, gaming, and delivery. These ETFs appeal amid shifting consumer behaviors toward digital and convenience-oriented spending, offering tiered options from broad sector access to specialized tilts. Investors weigh XLY's efficiency against the niche potential of ISHP and OND in a macro environment favoring innovation over traditional retail.
The First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is a passive, thematic ETF tracking the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, which targets companies engaged in the global e-commerce industry across retail, platforms, and logistics. It holds approximately 60 stocks, promoting moderate diversification. Top holdings include Baidu (BIDU, ~2.1%), Alphabet (GOOGL, ~2.0%), and Prologis (PLD, ~2.1%), with the top 10 comprising about 19% of assets. Sector allocations feature consumer cyclical (40.9%), communication services (24.5%), industrials (13.1%), and technology (10.2%). The expense ratio stands at 0.60%, reflecting active index curation. With ~$5M AUM and average daily volume around 300 shares, liquidity is modest. ISHP rebalances periodically to maintain e-commerce purity, distinguishing it as a global play on online commerce infrastructure rather than broad retailing.
ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) passively tracks the FactSet On-Demand Index, focusing on global companies enabling on-demand lifestyle services like digital media, e-gaming, food delivery, and ridesharing. It maintains 26-27 holdings, resulting in higher concentration. Top holdings feature NVDA (6.6%), EA (5.3%), Capcom (5.1%), Take-Two (TTWO, 4.9%), and NFLX (4.6%), with the top 10 at ~49%. Sectors tilt heavily to communication services (~59%), technology (23%), and consumer cyclical (15%). The expense ratio is 0.58%. AUM approximates $3.5M, with low average volume (~300-900 shares) indicating limited liquidity. As a non-diversified thematic fund, OND captures innovation in instant-access experiences, with rebalancing aligned to index rules for emerging on-demand leaders.
State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) is a passive ETF replicating the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, a subset of the S&P 500 focusing on U.S. large-cap firms in retail, autos, leisure, and media. It holds 48 stocks. Top holdings dominate: AMZN (27.8%), TSLA (20.7%), HD (5.1%), TJX (3.8%), and MCD (3.6%), with top 10 over 70%. Sub-industry weights include broadline retail (29%), automobiles (23%), and hotels/restaurants/leisure (22%). Expense ratio is a low 0.08%. Boasting $23B AUM and millions in daily volume, XLY offers exceptional liquidity with tight bid-ask spreads. Quarterly rebalancing ensures alignment with S&P methodology, positioning it as a benchmark for cyclical consumer spending.
The consumer discretionary sector faces a K-shaped recovery, with higher-income households sustaining spending on e-commerce, travel, and experiences amid resilient wealth effects from equities and homes, while lower-income groups curb outlays due to inflation and debt. Macro drivers include moderating interest rates supporting durables and housing-related buys, though tariff hikes erode real incomes and pressure imports-reliant retail. Capital flows favor tech-infused discretionary plays, with AI-driven efficiencies boosting gaming and digital media. Earnings trends show strength in online platforms but softness in traditional retail; geopolitical tensions add supply chain risks. Regulatory scrutiny on big tech and antitrust may cap mega-caps, while sector risks encompass economic slowdowns curbing non-essentials and persistent inflation squeezing margins.
In recent months, XLY has shown trend consistency tied to mega-caps like AMZN and TSLA, delivering stable gains in up-cycles but sharper drawdowns during risk-off periods due to 48% concentration in top two holdings. ISHP and OND exhibit higher relative volatility from thematic focus and global/emerging exposure, with OND's gaming/media tilt amplifying swings amid content cycles. ISHP's logistics balance tempers extremes but trails in digital booms. Performance divergences stem from structures: XLY's scale buffers volatility, while narrower ISHP/OND heighten sensitivity to innovation trends versus broad cyclicality. All share macro sensitivity to consumer confidence, with XLY least prone to concentration risk erosion.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in consumer themes.
Tickeron’s AI favors XLY with 65% probability in the current environment due to unmatched cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), superior diversification across 48 S&P 500 names, massive liquidity ($23B AUM, high volume), and stable momentum from proven consumer leaders. ISHP and OND offer compelling thematic upside but lag on fees, scale, and risk-adjusted positioning amid broader cyclical pressures.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| ISHP | OND | XLY | |
| Gain YTD | -13.412 | -16.759 | -4.767 |
| Net Assets | 5.1M | 3.43M | 22.4B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.08 |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 36.00 | 10.00 |
| Yield | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | 28 years |
| ISHP | OND | XLY | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISHP has been loosely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ISHP jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISHP | 100% | N/A | ||
| INTU - ISHP | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
| XYZ - ISHP | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| SE - ISHP | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| WB - ISHP | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CHWY - ISHP | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OND has been loosely correlated with BMBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OND jumps, then BMBL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OND | 100% | N/A | ||
| BMBL - OND | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| TME - OND | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| SPOT - OND | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
| TTWO - OND | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| UBER - OND | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.51% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLY has been loosely correlated with ETSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XLY jumps, then ETSY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLY | 100% | -2.05% | ||
| ETSY - XLY | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| WHR - XLY | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| UA - XLY | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| UAA - XLY | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| BBWI - XLY | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||