ISHP
Price
$32.81
Change
-$0.38 (-1.14%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
4.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OND
Price
$34.11
Change
-$0.42 (-1.22%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Net Assets
3.33M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLY
Price
$114.37
Change
+$1.02 (+0.90%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
21.67B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ISHP or OND or XLY

ISHP vs OND vs XLY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) vs. ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) vs. State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY)

Key Takeaways

  • XLY offers the broadest exposure to U.S. large-cap consumer discretionary stocks with superior liquidity and the lowest expense ratio at 0.08%, ideal for core sector positioning.
  • ISHP and OND are thematic ETFs targeting global e-commerce and on-demand services, respectively, providing narrower, higher-growth potential but with elevated costs (0.60% and 0.58%) and lower diversification.
  • ISHP holds around 60 stocks with balanced sector weights across consumer cyclical (41%), communication services (24%), and industrials (13%), emphasizing global e-commerce infrastructure.
  • OND concentrates in 26-27 high-growth names like NVDA (6.6%) and EA (5.3%), tilting toward communication services and technology for on-demand lifestyle trends.
  • XLY exhibits high concentration risk with top holdings AMZN (28%) and TSLA (21%) comprising nearly half the fund, amplifying sensitivity to mega-cap performance.
  • All three ETFs display higher volatility than broad markets due to cyclical consumer exposure, but XLY's scale ($23B AUM) ensures tighter spreads and easier trading.

Introduction

Comparing First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP), ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND), and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) highlights diverse approaches to consumer-driven growth. XLY provides passive, market-cap-weighted exposure to the broad U.S. consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500, capturing established giants in retail, autos, and leisure. In contrast, ISHP and OND represent thematic strategies: ISHP targets global e-commerce enablers like online platforms and logistics, while OND focuses on on-demand services spanning digital media, gaming, and delivery. These ETFs appeal amid shifting consumer behaviors toward digital and convenience-oriented spending, offering tiered options from broad sector access to specialized tilts. Investors weigh XLY's efficiency against the niche potential of ISHP and OND in a macro environment favoring innovation over traditional retail.

First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) Overview

The First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is a passive, thematic ETF tracking the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, which targets companies engaged in the global e-commerce industry across retail, platforms, and logistics. It holds approximately 60 stocks, promoting moderate diversification. Top holdings include Baidu (BIDU, ~2.1%), Alphabet (GOOGL, ~2.0%), and Prologis (PLD, ~2.1%), with the top 10 comprising about 19% of assets. Sector allocations feature consumer cyclical (40.9%), communication services (24.5%), industrials (13.1%), and technology (10.2%). The expense ratio stands at 0.60%, reflecting active index curation. With ~$5M AUM and average daily volume around 300 shares, liquidity is modest. ISHP rebalances periodically to maintain e-commerce purity, distinguishing it as a global play on online commerce infrastructure rather than broad retailing.

ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) Overview

ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) passively tracks the FactSet On-Demand Index, focusing on global companies enabling on-demand lifestyle services like digital media, e-gaming, food delivery, and ridesharing. It maintains 26-27 holdings, resulting in higher concentration. Top holdings feature NVDA (6.6%), EA (5.3%), Capcom (5.1%), Take-Two (TTWO, 4.9%), and NFLX (4.6%), with the top 10 at ~49%. Sectors tilt heavily to communication services (~59%), technology (23%), and consumer cyclical (15%). The expense ratio is 0.58%. AUM approximates $3.5M, with low average volume (~300-900 shares) indicating limited liquidity. As a non-diversified thematic fund, OND captures innovation in instant-access experiences, with rebalancing aligned to index rules for emerging on-demand leaders.

State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) Overview

State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) is a passive ETF replicating the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, a subset of the S&P 500 focusing on U.S. large-cap firms in retail, autos, leisure, and media. It holds 48 stocks. Top holdings dominate: AMZN (27.8%), TSLA (20.7%), HD (5.1%), TJX (3.8%), and MCD (3.6%), with top 10 over 70%. Sub-industry weights include broadline retail (29%), automobiles (23%), and hotels/restaurants/leisure (22%). Expense ratio is a low 0.08%. Boasting $23B AUM and millions in daily volume, XLY offers exceptional liquidity with tight bid-ask spreads. Quarterly rebalancing ensures alignment with S&P methodology, positioning it as a benchmark for cyclical consumer spending.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The consumer discretionary sector faces a K-shaped recovery, with higher-income households sustaining spending on e-commerce, travel, and experiences amid resilient wealth effects from equities and homes, while lower-income groups curb outlays due to inflation and debt. Macro drivers include moderating interest rates supporting durables and housing-related buys, though tariff hikes erode real incomes and pressure imports-reliant retail. Capital flows favor tech-infused discretionary plays, with AI-driven efficiencies boosting gaming and digital media. Earnings trends show strength in online platforms but softness in traditional retail; geopolitical tensions add supply chain risks. Regulatory scrutiny on big tech and antitrust may cap mega-caps, while sector risks encompass economic slowdowns curbing non-essentials and persistent inflation squeezing margins.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, XLY has shown trend consistency tied to mega-caps like AMZN and TSLA, delivering stable gains in up-cycles but sharper drawdowns during risk-off periods due to 48% concentration in top two holdings. ISHP and OND exhibit higher relative volatility from thematic focus and global/emerging exposure, with OND's gaming/media tilt amplifying swings amid content cycles. ISHP's logistics balance tempers extremes but trails in digital booms. Performance divergences stem from structures: XLY's scale buffers volatility, while narrower ISHP/OND heighten sensitivity to innovation trends versus broad cyclicality. All share macro sensitivity to consumer confidence, with XLY least prone to concentration risk erosion.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in consumer themes.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors XLY with 65% probability in the current environment due to unmatched cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), superior diversification across 48 S&P 500 names, massive liquidity ($23B AUM, high volume), and stable momentum from proven consumer leaders. ISHP and OND offer compelling thematic upside but lag on fees, scale, and risk-adjusted positioning amid broader cyclical pressures.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLY has more net assets: 21.7B vs. ISHP (4.89M) and OND (3.33M). XLY has a higher annual dividend yield than ISHP and OND: XLY (-3.837) vs ISHP (-15.848) and OND (-17.095). ISHP was incepted earlier than OND and XLY: ISHP (10 years) vs OND (5 years) and XLY (28 years). XLY (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than OND (0.58) and ISHP (0.60). ISHP has a higher turnover OND (36.00) and XLY (10.00) vs OND (36.00) and XLY (10.00).
ISHPONDXLY
Gain YTD-15.848-17.095-3.837
Net Assets4.89M3.33M21.7B
Total Expense Ratio0.600.580.08
Turnover41.0036.0010.00
Yield1.520.000.74
Fund Existence10 years5 years28 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISHPONDXLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ISHP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMTK0.240.01
+4.90%
SmartKem Inc.
KLRS4.390.09
+2.09%
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc
GIS36.010.61
+1.72%
General Mills
VINP9.690.08
+0.83%
Vinci Compass Investments Ltd
PENG62.32-4.45
-6.66%
Penguin Solutions Inc

ISHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISHP has been loosely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ISHP jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISHP
1D Price
Change %
ISHP100%
-3.09%
INTU - ISHP
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.96%
XYZ - ISHP
46%
Loosely correlated
+5.05%
PPLI - ISHP
45%
Loosely correlated
+5.76%
SE - ISHP
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
WB - ISHP
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More

OND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OND has been loosely correlated with BMBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OND jumps, then BMBL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OND
1D Price
Change %
OND100%
N/A
BMBL - OND
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.40%
TME - OND
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
EA - OND
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
LIF - OND
8%
Poorly correlated
+8.36%
CART - OND
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More

XLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLY has been loosely correlated with ETSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XLY jumps, then ETSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLY
1D Price
Change %
XLY100%
+0.90%
ETSY - XLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
WHR - XLY
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.29%
UA - XLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
UAA - XLY
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
BBWI - XLY
40%
Loosely correlated
+4.77%
More