Advertisement
KLAC or ONTO or Q
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KLAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileONTO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and Q’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- KLAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ONTO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- Q’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KLAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONTO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and Q’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KLAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ONTO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- Q’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -11.76% price change this week, while ONTO (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -19.44% , and Q (@Electronic Production Equipment) price fluctuated -10.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -12.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
KLAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
ONTO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-12.13% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| KLAC | ONTO | Q | |
| Capitalization | 237B | 13.9B | 26.4B |
| EBITDA | 6.28B | 199M | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 53.722 | 79.216 | 54.788 |
| P/E Ratio | 49.61 | 105.96 | 45.10 |
| Revenue | 13.6B | 1.03B | N/A |
| Total Cash | 613M | 654M | N/A |
| Total Debt | 6.15B | 17.5M | N/A |
KLAC | ONTO | Q | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 72 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 37 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 83 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 38 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 3 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
Q's Valuation (63) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as ONTO (80) in the null industry, and is in the same range as KLAC (83) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that Q's stock grew similarly to ONTO’s and similarly to KLAC’s over the last 12 months.
ONTO's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as KLAC (40) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for Q (100) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that ONTO's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and somewhat faster than Q’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's SMR Rating (14) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for ONTO (83) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for Q (100) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew significantly faster than ONTO’s and significantly faster than Q’s over the last 12 months.
ONTO's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as KLAC (44) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as Q (61) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that ONTO's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and similarly to Q’s over the last 12 months.
ONTO's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as KLAC (10) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for Q (53) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that ONTO's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and somewhat faster than Q’s over the last 12 months.
| KLAC | ONTO | Q | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 80% | 13 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
ONTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONTO has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONTO jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONTO | 100% | -3.55% | ||
| LRCX - ONTO | 81% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| AMAT - ONTO | 81% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| KLAC - ONTO | 80% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| ENTG - ONTO | 79% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| UCTT - ONTO | 78% Closely correlated | -4.78% | ||
More | ||||
Q and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, Q has been loosely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if Q jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.