LZ
Price
$5.83
Change
-$0.02 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
999.33M
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRI
Price
$105.53
Change
-$0.35 (-0.33%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
45.7B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRSK
Price
$187.50
Change
-$0.18 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
48.8B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LZ or TRI or VRSK

LZ vs TRI vs VRSK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2026
Stock price -- (LZ: $5.84TRI: $105.53VRSK: $187.50)
Brand notoriety: LZ, TRI and VRSK are all not notable
LZ and TRI are part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry, and VRSK is in the Data Processing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LZ: 63%, TRI: 66%, VRSK: 30%
Market capitalization -- LZ: $999.33M, TRI: $45.7B, VRSK: $48.8B
$LZ [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $999.33M. $TRI’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $ $45.7B. $VRSK [@Data Processing Services] has a market capitalization of $ $48.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $ $89.97B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $ $48.8B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $ $7.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $ $3.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and VRSK’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRSK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRSK is a better buy in the long-term than TRI, which in turn is a better option than LZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and VRSK’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VRSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LZ is a better buy in the short-term than TRI, which in turn is a better option than VRSK.

Price Growth

LZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +3.83% price change this week, while TRI (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +2.52% , and VRSK (@Data Processing Services) price fluctuated +3.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.75%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

VRSK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.29% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

@Data Processing Services (+0.14% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRSK($48.8B) has a higher market cap than TRI($45.7B) and LZ($999M). LZ has higher P/E ratio than VRSK and TRI: LZ (64.83) vs VRSK (28.80) and TRI (27.80). VRSK YTD gains are higher at: -15.737 vs. TRI (-17.026) and LZ (-41.239). TRI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.35B vs. VRSK (1.68B) and LZ (75.9M). VRSK has more cash in the bank: 551M vs. TRI (327M) and LZ (183M). LZ has less debt than TRI and VRSK: LZ (15.2M) vs TRI (2.45B) and VRSK (4.62B). TRI has higher revenues than VRSK and LZ: TRI (7.83B) vs VRSK (3.14B) and LZ (780M).
LZTRIVRSK
Capitalization999M45.7B48.8B
EBITDA75.9M3.35B1.68B
Gain YTD-41.239-17.026-15.737
P/E Ratio64.8327.8028.80
Revenue780M7.83B3.14B
Total Cash183M327M551M
Total Debt15.2M2.45B4.62B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TRI vs VRSK: Fundamental Ratings
TRI
VRSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9396
SMR RATING
1..100
726
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9184
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRI's Valuation (14) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (18) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.

TRI's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (96) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.

VRSK's SMR Rating (6) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRI (72) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew significantly faster than TRI’s over the last 12 months.

TRI's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (58) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.

VRSK's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as TRI (91) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to TRI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZTRIVRSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYN1.090.02
+1.87%
Cyngn Inc.
MET94.340.88
+0.94%
MetLife
OMAB102.870.91
+0.89%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte S.A.B. de C.V. ADS
MCBS35.600.10
+0.28%
MetroCity Bankshares
TDAC10.84-0.01
-0.09%
Translational Development Acquisition Corp.

LZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZ has been loosely correlated with TRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZ jumps, then TRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZ
1D Price
Change %
LZ100%
-0.43%
TRI - LZ
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
ARLO - LZ
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
MSA - LZ
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
RELX - LZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
CBZ - LZ
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
More

TRI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRI has been loosely correlated with RELX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRI jumps, then RELX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRI
1D Price
Change %
TRI100%
-0.33%
RELX - TRI
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
EXPO - TRI
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
VRSK - TRI
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
LZ - TRI
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
CPRT - TRI
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
More

VRSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRSK has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRSK jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRSK
1D Price
Change %
VRSK100%
-0.10%
EXPO - VRSK
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
TRI - VRSK
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
CTAS - VRSK
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
ABM - VRSK
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
RELX - VRSK
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
More