QLD
Price
$89.54
Change
-$9.48 (-9.57%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
14.56B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TQQQ
Price
$73.05
Change
-$12.17 (-14.28%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
39.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URTY
Price
$72.55
Change
-$8.65 (-10.65%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
357.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD or TQQQ or URTY

Header iconQLD vs TQQQ vs URTY Comparison
Open Charts QLD vs TQQQ vs URTYBanner chart's image
QLD vs TQQQ vs URTY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) vs. ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY)

Key Takeaways

  • QLD and TQQQ provide leveraged exposure to the large-cap Nasdaq-100 Index (approximately 100 non-financial companies), with 2x and 3x daily targets respectively, while URTY offers 3x leverage to the small-cap Russell 2000 Index (around 2,000 companies).
  • TQQQ boasts the lowest net expense ratio at 0.82%, compared to 0.95% for both QLD and URTY, enhancing cost efficiency for frequent traders.
  • TQQQ exhibits superior liquidity with over $35 billion in assets and average daily volume exceeding 68 million shares, far surpassing QLD ($13 billion AUM, 3.6 million volume) and URTY ($350 million AUM).
  • Nasdaq-100-focused ETFs (QLD, TQQQ) emphasize technology (over 65% allocation), contrasting URTY's diversified small-cap profile across industrials (17-19%), technology (17%), healthcare (16%), and financials (16%).
  • All three are leveraged ETFs using derivatives for daily rebalancing, amplifying volatility and introducing compounding effects unsuitable for long-term holding.
  • TQQQ's scale and cost edge position it favorably in tech-driven markets, while URTY suits small-cap rotation strategies amid economic shifts.

Introduction

QLD, TQQQ, and URTY represent leveraged strategies targeting distinct U.S. equity segments, making them compelling for comparison amid ongoing market rotations between large-cap technology leaders and small-cap challengers. QLD and TQQQ deliver 2x and 3x daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index, a benchmark of 100 largest non-financial Nasdaq-listed firms dominated by tech giants. URTY, meanwhile, triples daily returns of the Russell 2000 Index, capturing approximately 2,000 small-cap stocks with broader sector diversification. These ETFs appeal to tactical traders seeking amplified exposure in bullish environments, but their daily reset mechanisms heighten risks in volatile or sideways markets. Investors evaluate them for tiered leverage on megacap growth versus small-cap value potential, especially as macroeconomic factors like interest rates influence relative performance.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is a leveraged ETF seeking daily investment results corresponding to 2x the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index before fees. Launched in 2006, it tracks 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies via derivatives like swaps and futures, alongside direct holdings and money market instruments. Top holdings mirror the index, including NVDA (8.69% index weight), AAPL (7.64%), MSFT (5.64%), AMZN (4.59%), and TSLA (3.81%). Sector allocation heavily favors technology (65.8%), consumer discretionary (18.8%), with minimal financials (0%). The net expense ratio is 0.95% (gross 0.98%), with daily rebalancing to maintain leverage. QLD offers high liquidity ($13.4 billion AUM) but is non-diversified, amplifying volatility through its structure.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ), launched in 2010, aims for 3x the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index using a mix of equities, swaps, futures, and cash equivalents. Top exposures include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and Alphabet classes, reflecting the index's tech tilt (65.8% technology, 18.8% consumer discretionary). Sector breakdown aligns closely with QLD due to the shared benchmark. It features a competitive net expense ratio of 0.82% (gross 0.97%), daily rebalancing, and exceptional liquidity ($36 billion AUM, 68 million average daily volume). As a non-diversified fund, TQQQ's higher leverage intensifies both upside potential and drawdown risks via derivatives.

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) Overview

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY), also from 2010, targets 3x the daily returns of the Russell 2000 Index, representing the small-cap U.S. equity segment with about 2,000 holdings. It employs derivatives for leveraged exposure, emphasizing diversified sectors: industrials (17-19%), technology (17%), healthcare (16%), financial services (16%), consumer cyclical (8%), energy (6%), and real estate (6%). Unlike the Nasdaq-focused peers, URTY lacks dominant top holdings, promoting broader dispersion. The net expense ratio stands at 0.95% (gross 1.08%), with daily rebalancing. Liquidity is solid but trails the others ($350 million AUM, narrower bid-ask spread of 0.05%). Its structure suits short-term bets on small-cap outperformance, heightening sensitivity to economic cycles.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology sector, core to QLD and TQQQ via the Nasdaq-100, benefits from AI advancements, cloud computing growth, and robust earnings from megacaps, drawing sustained capital inflows. Macro drivers like moderating inflation and potential rate cuts bolster large-cap resilience. Conversely, the small-cap arena (URTY's focus) gains from economic recovery signals, deregulation prospects, and small firms' sensitivity to lower borrowing costs. Recent market cycles highlight rotation risks: small-caps lag in tech rallies but outperform during broadening recoveries. Geopolitical tensions and supply chain issues pose sector risks, while earnings trends favor profitable large-caps over volatile small-caps. Capital flows favor scale, but regulatory scrutiny on tech concentration adds caution.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, TQQQ has led with amplified gains from Nasdaq-100 momentum, reflecting its 3x leverage amid tech rallies, though exhibiting higher volatility and deeper drawdowns than QLD's 2x profile. URTY shows elevated relative volatility due to small-cap swings, underperforming in megacap-led uptrends but gaining in rotation phases. QLD balances upside capture with moderated risk versus TQQQ. Differences stem from leverage multiples and exposure: Nasdaq ETFs thrive on concentrated tech trends, while URTY's diversification heightens sensitivity to broad economic factors like rates. Concentration risk is pronounced in QLD/TQQQ (top 10 ~40%), versus URTY's spread. All suffer daily compounding drag in choppy markets.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap, total value of a company's shares), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. It identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like leveraged ETFs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors TQQQ in the current environment due to its superior liquidity, lowest expense ratio (0.82%), and structural alignment with tech momentum stability. While QLD offers balanced 2x exposure and URTY provides small-cap diversification, TQQQ's scale minimizes tracking error, with risk-adjusted positioning enhanced by Nasdaq-100's durable trends (~70% probability of outperformance over recent cycles based on observable metrics).

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 39.6B vs. QLD (14.6B) and URTY (357M). TQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than URTY and QLD: TQQQ (38.790) vs URTY (36.651) and QLD (27.196). QLD was incepted earlier than TQQQ and URTY: QLD (20 years) vs TQQQ (16 years) and URTY (16 years). TQQQ (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than QLD (0.95) and URTY (0.95). URTY has a higher turnover TQQQ (25.00) and QLD (16.00) vs TQQQ (25.00) and QLD (16.00).
QLDTQQQURTY
Gain YTD27.19638.79036.651
Net Assets14.6B39.6B357M
Total Expense Ratio0.950.820.95
Turnover16.0025.0091.00
Yield0.120.370.62
Fund Existence20 years16 years16 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDTQQQURTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URTY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMJA27.39N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January
IND22.22N/A
N/A
Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF
XFIV48.32-0.20
-0.41%
BondBloxx Bloomberg FiveYrTrgDurUSTrsETF
SGLC42.94-1.13
-2.57%
SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF
ILCG113.96-4.96
-4.17%
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-9.57%
LRCX - QLD
70%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
NVDA - QLD
68%
Closely correlated
-6.20%
KLAC - QLD
65%
Loosely correlated
-9.47%
ASML - QLD
65%
Loosely correlated
-6.59%
AMAT - QLD
65%
Loosely correlated
-9.71%
More

URTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that URTY and SMCI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URTY and SMCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To URTY
1D Price
Change %
URTY100%
-10.65%
SMCI - URTY
31%
Poorly correlated
-11.22%