QLD, TQQQ, and URTY represent leveraged strategies targeting distinct U.S. equity segments, making them compelling for comparison amid ongoing market rotations between large-cap technology leaders and small-cap challengers. QLD and TQQQ deliver 2x and 3x daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index, a benchmark of 100 largest non-financial Nasdaq-listed firms dominated by tech giants. URTY, meanwhile, triples daily returns of the Russell 2000 Index, capturing approximately 2,000 small-cap stocks with broader sector diversification. These ETFs appeal to tactical traders seeking amplified exposure in bullish environments, but their daily reset mechanisms heighten risks in volatile or sideways markets. Investors evaluate them for tiered leverage on megacap growth versus small-cap value potential, especially as macroeconomic factors like interest rates influence relative performance.
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is a leveraged ETF seeking daily investment results corresponding to 2x the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index before fees. Launched in 2006, it tracks 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies via derivatives like swaps and futures, alongside direct holdings and money market instruments. Top holdings mirror the index, including NVDA (8.69% index weight), AAPL (7.64%), MSFT (5.64%), AMZN (4.59%), and TSLA (3.81%). Sector allocation heavily favors technology (65.8%), consumer discretionary (18.8%), with minimal financials (0%). The net expense ratio is 0.95% (gross 0.98%), with daily rebalancing to maintain leverage. QLD offers high liquidity ($13.4 billion AUM) but is non-diversified, amplifying volatility through its structure.
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ), launched in 2010, aims for 3x the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index using a mix of equities, swaps, futures, and cash equivalents. Top exposures include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and Alphabet classes, reflecting the index's tech tilt (65.8% technology, 18.8% consumer discretionary). Sector breakdown aligns closely with QLD due to the shared benchmark. It features a competitive net expense ratio of 0.82% (gross 0.97%), daily rebalancing, and exceptional liquidity ($36 billion AUM, 68 million average daily volume). As a non-diversified fund, TQQQ's higher leverage intensifies both upside potential and drawdown risks via derivatives.
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY), also from 2010, targets 3x the daily returns of the Russell 2000 Index, representing the small-cap U.S. equity segment with about 2,000 holdings. It employs derivatives for leveraged exposure, emphasizing diversified sectors: industrials (17-19%), technology (17%), healthcare (16%), financial services (16%), consumer cyclical (8%), energy (6%), and real estate (6%). Unlike the Nasdaq-focused peers, URTY lacks dominant top holdings, promoting broader dispersion. The net expense ratio stands at 0.95% (gross 1.08%), with daily rebalancing. Liquidity is solid but trails the others ($350 million AUM, narrower bid-ask spread of 0.05%). Its structure suits short-term bets on small-cap outperformance, heightening sensitivity to economic cycles.
The technology sector, core to QLD and TQQQ via the Nasdaq-100, benefits from AI advancements, cloud computing growth, and robust earnings from megacaps, drawing sustained capital inflows. Macro drivers like moderating inflation and potential rate cuts bolster large-cap resilience. Conversely, the small-cap arena (URTY's focus) gains from economic recovery signals, deregulation prospects, and small firms' sensitivity to lower borrowing costs. Recent market cycles highlight rotation risks: small-caps lag in tech rallies but outperform during broadening recoveries. Geopolitical tensions and supply chain issues pose sector risks, while earnings trends favor profitable large-caps over volatile small-caps. Capital flows favor scale, but regulatory scrutiny on tech concentration adds caution.
In recent months, TQQQ has led with amplified gains from Nasdaq-100 momentum, reflecting its 3x leverage amid tech rallies, though exhibiting higher volatility and deeper drawdowns than QLD's 2x profile. URTY shows elevated relative volatility due to small-cap swings, underperforming in megacap-led uptrends but gaining in rotation phases. QLD balances upside capture with moderated risk versus TQQQ. Differences stem from leverage multiples and exposure: Nasdaq ETFs thrive on concentrated tech trends, while URTY's diversification heightens sensitivity to broad economic factors like rates. Concentration risk is pronounced in QLD/TQQQ (top 10 ~40%), versus URTY's spread. All suffer daily compounding drag in choppy markets.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap, total value of a company's shares), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. It identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like leveraged ETFs.
Tickeron’s AI favors TQQQ in the current environment due to its superior liquidity, lowest expense ratio (0.82%), and structural alignment with tech momentum stability. While QLD offers balanced 2x exposure and URTY provides small-cap diversification, TQQQ's scale minimizes tracking error, with risk-adjusted positioning enhanced by Nasdaq-100's durable trends (~70% probability of outperformance over recent cycles based on observable metrics).
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| QLD | TQQQ | URTY | |
| Gain YTD | 30.451 | 42.728 | 62.409 |
| Net Assets | 13.5B | 35.1B | 379M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.95 |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 25.00 | 91.00 |
| Yield | 0.12 | 0.37 | 0.62 |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | 16 years |
| QLD | TQQQ | URTY | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PRN | 257.78 | 5.56 | +2.20% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright IndustrialsMomtETF | |||
| FCA | 28.73 | 0.48 | +1.71% |
| First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| ZAP | 35.00 | 0.24 | +0.69% |
| Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | |||
| QLTY | 40.67 | 0.07 | +0.17% |
| GMO U.S. Quality ETF | |||
| UUUG | 5.24 | -0.42 | -7.35% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +1.55% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 73% Closely correlated | +7.21% | ||
| NVDA - QLD | 70% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| KLAC - QLD | 68% Closely correlated | +7.62% | ||
| MU - QLD | 67% Closely correlated | +15.74% | ||
| ASML - QLD | 67% Closely correlated | +4.45% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TQQQ | 100% | +2.25% | ||
| LRCX - TQQQ | 73% Closely correlated | +7.21% | ||
| NVDA - TQQQ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| KLAC - TQQQ | 70% Closely correlated | +7.62% | ||
| ASML - TQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | +4.45% | ||
| AMAT - TQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | +13.42% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that URTY and SMCI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URTY and SMCI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To URTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| URTY | 100% | +1.93% | ||
| SMCI - URTY | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.37% |