SHOC
Price
$119.53
Change
+$4.63 (+4.03%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Net Assets
261.84M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$636.88
Change
+$17.96 (+2.90%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Net Assets
71.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXQ
Price
$109.80
Change
+$3.96 (+3.74%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Net Assets
2.76B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHOC or SMH or SOXQ

SHOC vs SMH vs SOXQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) vs. Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ)

Key Takeaways

  • SOXQ offers the lowest expense ratio at 0.19%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term holders compared to SHOC (0.40%) and SMH (0.35%).
  • SHOC provides concentrated exposure with top holdings like NVDA (19.42%) and AVGO (13.31%), emphasizing U.S.-listed leaders and governance focus.
  • SMH tracks 25-26 holdings with global scope via U.S.-listed ADRs like TSM, balancing liquidity and industry representation.
  • SOXQ holds 31 stocks with quarterly rebalancing, promoting relative diversification within semiconductors (79.97% allocation).
  • All exhibit high concentration risk, but SOXQ shows marginally lower volatility in recent months due to broader weighting.
  • Structural differences in indexing lead to varied sensitivity to AI-driven mega-caps versus memory/equipment plays.

Introduction

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC), VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH), and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) provide targeted exposure to the surging semiconductor sector, fueled by artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure demand and advanced computing needs. These passive ETFs track distinct indexes of U.S.-listed semiconductor firms, differing in holding counts, weighting methodologies, and inclusion of global ADRs. SHOC emphasizes U.S.-focused governance tilts, SMH prioritizes liquidity leaders with international flavor, and SOXQ mirrors the established PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index with cost advantages. Amid record industry sales projections nearing $1 trillion in 2026, comparing their structures helps investors assess diversification, costs, and positioning in this high-growth, volatile theme.

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) Overview

The Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) is a passively managed fund tracking the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Total Return Index, providing concentrated exposure to approximately 30 U.S.-listed semiconductor companies weighted by market capitalization adjusted for sector revenue. It holds around 30-33 stocks, with top holdings including NVDA (19.42%), AVGO (13.31%), INTC (8.28%), AMD (7.03%), and ASML (6.69%). Sector allocation is nearly 100% semiconductors, primarily information technology. The expense ratio is 0.40%. Distinguishing features include active corporate governance via proxy voting and issuer engagement to promote operational excellence. The index shifted in March 2024 for enhanced selectivity. Liquidity remains solid with tight spreads.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, focusing on the 25 most liquid U.S.-exchange-listed semiconductor producers and equipment firms, modified market-cap weighted. It maintains 25-26 holdings, with leading positions in NVDA (~18%), TSM (~11%), AVGO (~8%), INTC (~7%), and AMD (~6%). Allocation is 100% technology/semiconductors, incorporating U.S.-listed foreign firms for broader representation. Expense ratio stands at 0.35%. Key traits include emphasis on trading volume alongside market cap for liquidity, non-diversified structure, and established track record since 2011. Top 10 holdings comprise over 70% of assets, heightening concentration.

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) Overview

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) replicates the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, a modified market-cap-weighted benchmark of the 30 largest U.S.-listed semiconductor companies engaged in design, manufacturing, and sales. It features 31 holdings, topped by NVDA (9.98%), MU (9.92%), AVGO (9.22%), INTC (7.50%), and AMD (6.23%). Sector breakdown: semiconductors (79.97%), production equipment (20.03%), all within technology. The expense ratio is a competitive 0.19%. Notable aspects include quarterly rebalancing (March, June, September, December) and annual reconstitution, with tight bid-ask spreads indicating strong liquidity. Non-diversified with U.S. dominance (~90%).

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The semiconductor sector thrives amid AI infrastructure expansion, with global sales projected to hit $975 billion in 2026, up 26% year-over-year, driven by hyperscaler capital expenditures on accelerators and memory. Capital flows heavily into U.S. firms via CHIPS Act subsidies ($52 billion+), spurring domestic fabs despite elevated costs. Macro tailwinds include resilient GDP growth and easing inflation, though high capex strains profitability. Regulatory shifts, like withdrawn U.S. AI chip export rules, reduce uncertainty, while geopolitical tensions—export controls, tariffs—prompt supply chain diversification from Asia. Earnings trends favor AI leaders, but memory shortages and power constraints pose risks. Geoeconomic fragmentation elevates sector volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, all three ETFs have advanced robustly on AI demand, with SMH often leading due to heavier mega-cap tilt toward NVDA and TSM, exhibiting trend consistency in upcycles. SOXQ displays relative stability with lower one-month volatility (~10% vs. SHOC's 9-10%, SMH similar), benefiting from memory exposure like MU during rotations. SHOC mirrors SMH's dynamics but with U.S. purity, showing comparable drawdowns. Differences stem from indexing: SMH's liquidity focus amplifies leaders, SOXQ's quarterly resets curb extremes, SHOC's governance adds minor alpha potential. Concentration heightens sensitivity to mega-cap earnings and macro factors like rates impacting capex.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover semiconductor insights and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors SOXQ with moderate conviction (60-70% probability edge) for current positioning. Its superior cost efficiency (0.19% expense ratio), quarterly rebalancing for controlled concentration, and balanced exposure across semiconductors and equipment yield optimal risk-adjusted stability amid volatility. While SMH and SHOC excel in mega-cap momentum, SOXQ's diversification tempers drawdowns without sacrificing theme purity, aligning with momentum stability in recent cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 71.6B vs. SOXQ (2.76B) and SHOC (262M). SOXQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH and SHOC: SOXQ (97.246) vs SMH (76.847) and SHOC (74.272). SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH and SOXQ: SHOC (4 years) vs SMH (15 years) and SOXQ (5 years). SOXQ (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35) and SHOC (0.40). SHOC and SOXQ has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
SHOCSMHSOXQ
Gain YTD74.27276.84797.246
Net Assets262M71.6B2.76B
Total Expense Ratio0.400.350.19
Turnover25.0012.0024.00
Yield0.150.180.28
Fund Existence4 years15 years5 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHOCSMHSOXQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLWS101.400.33
+0.33%
SLW Short Duration Income ETF
TXS39.760.12
+0.30%
Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF
SPUU207.780.06
+0.03%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Bull 2X ETF
IYK72.90N/A
N/A
iShares US Consumer Staples ETF
GEW54.34-0.40
-0.73%
Cambria Global EW ETF

SHOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHOC
1D Price
Change %
SHOC100%
+4.03%
LRCX - SHOC
86%
Closely correlated
+7.21%
KLAC - SHOC
83%
Closely correlated
+7.62%
AMAT - SHOC
82%
Closely correlated
+13.42%
ASML - SHOC
79%
Closely correlated
+4.45%
MPWR - SHOC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
+2.90%
LRCX - SMH
87%
Closely correlated
+7.21%
KLAC - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
+7.62%
AMAT - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
+13.42%
TSM - SMH
81%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
ASML - SMH
80%
Closely correlated
+4.45%
More

SOXQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXQ
1D Price
Change %
SOXQ100%
+3.74%
LRCX - SOXQ
86%
Closely correlated
+7.21%
KLAC - SOXQ
83%
Closely correlated
+7.62%
AMAT - SOXQ
83%
Closely correlated
+13.42%
MPWR - SOXQ
82%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
MKSI - SOXQ
80%
Closely correlated
+7.52%
More