Intuitive Machines, Inc. is a space exploration, infrastructure, and services company, not an ETF. Its analyst coverage is active but unusually divided. Reviewing eight recent, named price targets — including B. Riley ($34), KeyBanc ($30), Canaccord Genuity ($39), Cantor Fitzgerald ($32), Roth MKM ($30), Stifel ($26), Deutsche Bank ($20), and Bank of America ($13) — produces a range of $13 to $39 and an arithmetic mean of $28, which is the central target used throughout this article.
That dispersion matters more than the average itself. Most firms rate the stock a Buy or Overweight, yet several have been cutting targets sharply: Roth MKM lowered its target from $75 to $30, B. Riley from $43 to $34, KeyBanc from $38 to $30, Cantor Fitzgerald from $43 to $32, and Deutsche Bank from $34 to $20. Meanwhile Bank of America maintains an Underperform rating with a $13 target. Bulls cite the company's position in NASA's CLPS 2 lunar program and a fast-growing revenue base, while skeptics point to continued losses and limited near-term visibility on profitability.
Following its November 12 earnings report, LUNR shares traded around $13, up from a prior close of $12.18. To reach the $28 central target, the stock would need to climb roughly 112% — a very large move. The shares have swung from a 52-week low of $7.78 to a 52-week high of $46.75, illustrating how volatile this name has been since its May 2026 peak.
The path to $28 would require the company to sustain revenue momentum, begin converting its contract wins into clearer profitability, and convince investors that its premium valuation is justified. The company's trailing-twelve-month revenue of roughly $490 million has grown more than 100% year over year, but EPS (earnings per share) over the trailing twelve months remains negative at about -$0.95, so the stock currently trades on potential rather than demonstrated earnings power.
The shares have rebounded from a base in the $8-to-$10 range in early November after a steep multi-month decline from the $46.75 high. The $13 area, which coincides with Bank of America's low-end target, is a near-term psychological level, while $20 and $26 mark prior analyst-based reference points on any recovery path. A sustained move above these levels would be needed before the $28 target becomes structurally relevant.
Analyst price targets generally reflect a roughly 12-month research horizon, though individual firms differ. Investors focused on the $28 target should watch quarterly results and guidance, any further analyst rating or target changes, updates on the CLPS 2 program and other NASA contracts, government budget and funding developments, and the company's progress toward narrowing losses and generating free cash flow.
For traders who prefer a systematic approach, Tickeron's AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals use artificial intelligence to continuously monitor thousands of stocks and ETFs, generating Buy, Sell, or Hold signals based on shifting market conditions, technical behavior, and AI-driven analysis. These signals can help investors discover new opportunities, keep an eye on existing positions, and identify changing trends more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals to see how automated monitoring might fit your research process.
The $28 central target for LUNR is the arithmetic mean of eight verified analyst targets spanning $13 to $39, and it sits roughly 112% above the recent price of around $13. Reaching it is therefore a very large move that would require sustained revenue growth, a credible path to profitability, and renewed investor confidence in a stock that has already pulled back sharply from its 2026 highs. The bullish case rests on NASA contract momentum and rapid top-line expansion, while the bearish case — reflected in Bank of America's Underperform rating and the broader wave of target cuts — centers on execution risk and continued losses. The wide analyst range signals genuine uncertainty rather than consensus. What happens next with earnings, guidance, and contract awards will likely determine whether the stock can close even part of the gap toward $28.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNR has been closely correlated with RKLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUNR jumps, then RKLB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LUNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUNR | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| RKLB - LUNR | 79% Closely correlated | -3.96% | ||
| VOYG - LUNR | 73% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| FLY - LUNR | 71% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| RDW - LUNR | 70% Closely correlated | -3.74% | ||
| PL - LUNR | 68% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||