Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Oct 21, 2021
5 Common Mistakes that Lead Traders to Huge Losses

5 Common Mistakes that Lead Traders to Huge Losses

Stock trading is not a hobby. It’s science. Anyone who thinks otherwise is destined to experience huge losses at some point. Hobbyists tend to have a lack of emotional control. They do everything on impulse because they “feel it in their gut.” That might work once or twice for a trader. In the long run, without a trading plan, it’s a path to failure.  

Most of the mistakes that result in stock market losses are directly related to the behavioral biases of the trader. The most dangerous of these is the disposition effect, a tendency to sell early or hold too long. Many traders do this and actually deceive themselves into thinking of it as a solid trading plan, justifying their actions by claiming they are minimizing risk.

Selling a stock before it hits maximum value is fear. Holding on too long is greed. There’s no science behind either and certainly no data to support these actions as valid trading strategies. To correct those behaviors, it’s important to look at the common mistakes that lead to a fear or greed-based mindset. Neither happens naturally. They’ve learned behaviors.

Mistake #1: Trading without a Plan

Newbies will open up a Robinhood account and start trading based on what the Motley Fool or Seeking Alpha tells them to do. They’ll read the Journal or Barron’s and hear about the next big tech stock and how it will make them millions in a few years. They know nothing about volume, liquidity, or Sharpe’s ratio, so they “trade” based on what the media tells them.

This is not a plan. Eventually, the folks who operate like this either fade away and open a safe ETF portfolio at Acorns or they learn and start to look at market indicators and historical graphs. The damage is already done, though. They’ve either taken so many losses that they’re desperate for a gain or they’re gun-shy and jump out of positions too soon.

More experienced traders make this mistake also. It’s not an accident that stock promoters release articles right before the market opens. Their job is to drive investor behaviors. It’s pretty easy to hype a mediocre stock with low trading volume to a desperate audience. If you’re having a bad week, you might just buy into it. Don’t do it. Always have a plan.

Mistake #2: Riding the Imaginary Wave

On June 5th, 2020, the Dow jumped 3.2% to close over 27,000 for the first time since February 25th, the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States. I did well because I was invested in several petroleum options that aged out that day, which was a Friday. As an experienced trader, I took my wins and waited out the weekend.

A one-day spike is not a wave. Day traders and scalpers did well on June 5th because they know how to buy on the upslope and sell before the decline. The market jumped after an optimistic jobs report. It moved based on emotion, not market conditions. My options to sell OXY at $16 netted me $320 per contract. The stock was selling at $24.40 a share. Today it’s at $17.66.

Big wins make you want to double down and get more big wins. That’s why casinos and racetracks do well. Real traders, contrary to popular opinion, are not gamblers. If you score a big win on an up-market day, enjoy it, but stick to your original trading plan until you see some real movement. In other words, don’t go “all-in” on what could be a bluff. 

Mistake #3: Confusing Loss Aversion with Risk Management

Loss aversion is a fear of loss, not a risk management strategy. When mental accounting starts and you regularly hold positions too long, you may be experiencing a cognitive bias. Tell yourself it’s a long-term plan if you want, but you’re a trader, not an investor. Those positions should have been sold when they first started to decline. That’s how you mitigate losses. 

Traders need confidence. Fear should never dictate whether you buy or sell. Unfortunately, loss aversion is psychological, not a learned behavior. That makes it harder to overcome. It also makes it more difficult to detect. That’s why you should always keep a trade journal. Harmful tendencies will eventually reveal themselves if you track all activity.

Another way to offset loss aversion is to set up stop-losses on all trades. You should be doing this anyway. No matter how dedicated you are to watch the market on your computer screen, life will take you away from it at some point. Stop losses automate the selling process for you and give you the freedom to step back. Go to lunch. Take a walk. Enjoy life.

Mistake #4: Punching Above Your Weight

Yes, it’s a boxing expression. It’s also a life metaphor for people who try to do something they’re not capable of. In your case, that’s trading large positions when you have limited equity. Sadly, this is a common mistake among traders. You see that Tesla is moving, so you buy a huge block of it. Then you watch it go down like a failed rocket launch the next day.

Is Tesla a bad investment? Absolutely not. But you’re a trader, not an investor. Dumping all your equity into a large position will leave you paralyzed. It goes against the root concept of trading. Your success is dependent on constant movement in and out of trades. Betting everything on just one trade is simply not smart. You could lose everything.

Start small. If you’re new to the trading world, buy small positions and experiment with risk management strategies. Evaluate charts and graphs. Use a simulator to test your trading plan so you don’t lose any money. Tickeron’s Paper Trade application is one of the best available for this. 

Mistake #5: Buying into the Hype

Do you know how stock promoters make money? It’s not from the pop-up ads on their blog. Stock promoters make money off your behaviors. They hype up a stock, hoping to increase trading volume and drive up the price. Then they sell when the stock hits a peak, driving the price back down and taking a chunk out of your trade balance.

They are predators. Don’t be a victim. Successful traders make decisions based on technical and fundamental analysis, not media hype. When you lose sight of that, you’re setting yourself up for a loss. Jim Cramer doesn’t care if you make money. He has his own portfolio. When Jim gets out there and honks his horn, he’s looking to move the market for his benefit, not yours.

Stick to market trends, historical analysis, charts, patterns, and statistics. Take advantage of optimized pattern and trend search engine tools at Tickeron to find winning stocks. The nonsense being spouted by stock promoters is nothing more than background noise. If you want proof of that, put one of their “sure things” on a watch list for a few weeks. You might see a small spike that corresponds with their big “announcement,” but it will likely be a blip, followed by a big dip.

Understanding and Overcoming Behavioral Bias

Every human defect of character or shortcoming is based on fear. If you’re suffering from a behavioral bias, you’re not defective. You’re just human. The bias is likely viewed by your subconscious as a self-protection mechanism. Combat this by becoming conscious of the problem and seeking ways to overcome it. Here are some examples:

  • Representative Bias: Day traders sometimes make snap judgments based on past experiences. This can be an asset, but it can also become a destructive pattern. Condition yourself to treat every trade autonomously. Use your tools. 

  • Cognitive Dissonance: You’re likely a Type A personality. Most traders are. Cognitive dissonance is the bias that makes you incapable of seeing an opposing viewpoint. You’re convinced that you’re right. Train your brain to be open to new ideas.

  • Home Country Bias: Nationalism is not a profitable business model, for you as a trader or for your nation. Stock trading is a global profession. Don’t listen to the politicians on this. If you can make money on Alibaba, buy it. The country of origin doesn’t matter.

  • Mood Bias: If you’re pessimistic and always expect underperformance, you’ll struggle as a trader. Optimists who believe losses will always turn to gains if you wait long enough will just take bigger losses. Find a balance. Better yet, leave your feelings at the door. 

  • Attachment Bias: Green is the only color that matters to a trader. It has no political affiliation, religion, or country of origin. It doesn’t care if you drill for oil or drive an electric car. If any of these affect your trading decisions, you’re in the wrong business.  

Practice Makes Perfect

Okay, you’ll never be perfect, but if you practice on a simulator before jumping into live trading, you’ll have more good days than bad days. Tickeron’s Paper Trade simulator allows traders to discover their own strategies and sharpen trading skills, time management, and emotional control before trading with real money. You can learn more about it here

Related Ticker: OXY

OXY in -2.34% downward trend, declining for three consecutive days on July 01, 2026

Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where OXY declined for three days, in of 313 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

OXY moved below its 50-day moving average on June 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The Aroon Indicator for OXY entered a downward trend on July 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where OXY's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. of 52 cases where OXY's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on July 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on OXY as a result. In of 79 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for OXY just turned positive on July 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where OXY's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where OXY advanced for three days, in of 300 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

OXY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. OXY’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.739) is normal, around the industry mean (7.294). P/E Ratio (72.419) is within average values for comparable stocks, (45.768). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.129) is also within normal values, averaging (5.030). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (0.067) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.553) is also within normal values, averaging (5.584).

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), Canadian Natural Resources Limited (NYSE:CNQ), EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG), Occidental Petroleum Corp (NYSE:OXY), Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG), Devon Energy Corp (NYSE:DVN), EQT Corp (NYSE:EQT), Expand Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:EXE), APA Corp (NASDAQ:APA), ANTERO RESOURCES Corp (NYSE:AR).

Industry description

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Oil & Gas Production Industry is 9.17B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 3.28K to 132.11B. COP holds the highest valuation in this group at 132.11B. The lowest valued company is PSTRQ at 3.28K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Oil & Gas Production Industry was 2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -6%, and the average quarterly price growth was 14%. BATL experienced the highest price growth at 27%, while MVO experienced the biggest fall at -54%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Oil & Gas Production Industry was 156%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 98% and the average quarterly volume growth was 141%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 50
P/E Growth Rating: 50
Price Growth Rating: 59
SMR Rating: 74
Profit Risk Rating: 75
Seasonality Score: -8 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
OXY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Industry OilGasProduction

Profile
Details
Industry
Oil And Gas Production
Address
5 Greenway Plaza
Phone
+1 713 215-7000
Employees
12570
Web
https://www.oxy.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Aon plc (AON) reported third-quarter 2025 revenue of $3.997 billion, representing a 7% year-over-year increase with equal organic growth. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $3.05, exceeding expectations. In late November, Moody’s reaffirmed Aon’s Baa2 credit rating and revised the outlook to positive, citing reduced leverage following the NFP acquisition.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) entered the spotlight after announcing advanced discussions with Yara International on December 8 to collaborate on low-emission ammonia projects. While the strategic direction aligns with global decarbonization trends, uncertainty around execution and capital requirements triggered a 9.45% one-day decline in the stock.
Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation are two of the most prominent names in the aerospace and defense industry, both positioned to benefit from heightened global security concerns and sustained U.S. military spending.
As 2025 winds down, the Savings Banks sector reflects a mix of stability, innovation, and AI-driven disruption. Among the most closely watched tickers—SOFI Technologies (SOFI), Ally Financial (ALLY), and PayPal Holdings (PYPL)—investors have witnessed contrasting stories of growth, valuation, and market perception.
Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is a wireless technology company focused on delivering secure, long-range communications for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and data networking applications. Its solutions are built to support mission-critical operations across sectors such as rail, energy, maritime, infrastructure, and industrial automation.
Ciena’s growth is driven by expanding offerings in optical networking, network automation software, and 5G transport infrastructure, complemented by services designed to help customers modernize and future-proof their networks. Its evolving technology portfolio addresses the rising complexity, speed, and reliability requirements of today’s communications environment.
Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) are two leading companies in the Bitcoin mining industry, each operating energy-intensive infrastructure to capitalize on cryptocurrency market cycles. This comparison is especially relevant amid ongoing Bitcoin price volatility and growing interest in digital assets and AI-related infrastructure.
Roivant Sciences has delivered strong year-to-date performance, with shares up roughly 82%, driven by encouraging pipeline developments and increased investment in high-potential subsidiaries such as Immunovant.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) are central to the United States’ push to establish a secure, domestic supply of rare earth elements—materials critical to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and defense technologies. As geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities intensify, these two companies offer distinct approaches to addressing U.S. dependence on foreign sources.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) remains one of the most closely followed ETFs worldwide, offering investors direct exposure to the NASDAQ-100 Index®. In the most recent data, QQQ has gained a notable +20.16% year-to-date, even as markets experienced bouts of elevated volatility.
Sidus Space has expanded its portfolio in 2025, focusing on satellite missions and supporting technologies to enhance space infrastructure. Key product advancements include the LizzieSat platforms, with multiple units progressing in design and manufacturing. LizzieSat-3 is set for launch no earlier than Q1 2025, building on prior missions to boost data capabilities for clients in Earth observation and communication.
As 2025 comes to a close, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) continues to strengthen its position in China’s competitive fresh grocery e-commerce market. Operating from Shanghai, the company focuses on high-quality fresh produce, ready-to-eat meals, and daily essentials delivered directly to consumers. Throughout the year, Dingdong emphasized private-label expansion, supply-chain optimization, and fulfillment network growth—initiatives that supported improving quarterly performance and positioned the company for sustained momentum.
Pioneer Power's 2025 highlights include the expansion of its mobile power and charging footprint with new orders and partnerships; the launch of a new suite of e-Boost solutions for off-grid EV charging; the rebranding of HomeBoost as PowerCore with events in December; the introduction of PRYMUS in December; and a new five-year contract for network transformers with a regional utility provider.
An AI-driven comparison between Palantir (PLTR) and Oracle (ORCL) points to Palantir as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights PLTR’s AI-native platforms, which enable real-time, data-driven decision-making across fast-growing sectors such as government, defense, and enterprise analytics.
An AI-driven comparison between D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and IonQ (IONQ) points to IonQ as the stronger opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights IONQ’s gate-based, trapped-ion quantum architecture, which supports a wide range of algorithms and positions the company for broader adoption across AI, simulation, and cryptography.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) points to Rigetti as the more compelling opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RGTI’s gate-based quantum architecture, which supports universal quantum computing and a wide range of complex algorithms. While D-Wave remains a leader in quantum annealing for optimization problems, Rigetti’s full-stack, gate-based approach offers greater scalability and broader long-term applications.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and TeraWulf (WULF) points to TeraWulf as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes WULF’s large-scale digital infrastructure supporting Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC), which generates immediate revenue in expanding digital asset and AI-driven markets.
An AI-driven comparison between Rocket Lab USA (RKLB) and Planet Labs (PL) identifies Rocket Lab as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RKLB’s vertically integrated space services and consistent launch performance, which position the company to benefit from rising demand for satellite deployment and space infrastructure.
An AI-driven comparison of Tempus AI (TEM) and Doximity (DOCS) points to Tempus AI as the more compelling investment opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights TEM’s AI-powered precision medicine platform, which applies advanced analytics and genomic data to transform diagnostics and treatment in oncology and cardiology.