GET DAILY SIGNALSCARZ vs PEJ: Contrasting Mobility Tech and Leisure Themes
Key Takeaways
- CARZ is a thematic, technology-heavy fund spanning the electric and autonomous vehicle ecosystem, while PEJ is a smart-beta fund concentrated in U.S. leisure, travel, and entertainment.
- The two funds do not compete directly; they offer contrasting exposures to different parts of the consumer economy and carry distinct risk profiles.
- CARZ holds roughly 100 global securities with a heavy information technology tilt, whereas PEJ holds about 30 mostly U.S. names concentrated in consumer discretionary.
- Costs are broadly similar: CARZ charges a 0.70% expense ratio, while PEJ charges 0.57%.
- Relative positioning favors CARZ for diversification and secular technology momentum, while PEJ is more sensitive to consumer spending and interest rates.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: CARZ is the favored ticker of the two in the current environment.
An Introduction to These Distinct ETFs
Comparing CARZ and PEJ highlights two very different investment approaches. One focuses on the future of mobility along with the semiconductors, software, and materials that support it. The other follows the current state of travel, dining, live events, and hospitality. These exchange-traded funds do not overlap in exposure, yet both can fit into portfolios seeking exposure to consumer and industrial trends. Their structural differences, sector weights, and positioning help clarify which thematic or cyclical approach aligns better with a diversified strategy today.
Understanding CARZ: Future Vehicles and Technology
CARZ is a passively managed, non-diversified thematic ETF that tracks the S-Network Electric & Future Vehicle Ecosystem Index. It invests across the full ecosystem of electric and autonomous vehicle makers, enabling technologies, and materials rather than limiting itself to automakers alone. The fund holds roughly 100 securities, weighted by float-adjusted market capitalization, and launched in May 2011. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the holdings compare within the broader industry.
Even with its automotive focus, the portfolio leans heavily toward technology. Typical top holdings include MSFT, NVDA, TSLA, AAPL, GOOGL, TSM, MU, AMD, INTC, and Samsung Electronics. Information technology usually accounts for near or above 60% of assets, with smaller allocations to consumer discretionary, communication services, industrials, and materials. The fund tilts toward the United States but also carries exposure to South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and Germany. The expense ratio stands at 0.70%.
Breaking Down PEJ: Leisure and Entertainment Focus
PEJ is a smart-beta ETF that follows the Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Intellidex Index. This multifactor benchmark selects and tiered-equal-weights U.S. leisure and entertainment companies based on price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, and value. Launched in June 2005, the fund is non-diversified and rebalances quarterly.
With roughly 30 holdings, PEJ is considerably more concentrated than CARZ. Typical top positions include EXPE, ABNB, MAR, LVS, CCL, SYY, RCL, UAL, LYV, HLT, and WBD. Consumer discretionary leads the sector mix at around 55% historically, followed by communication services, industrials (mainly airlines), and consumer staples. The expense ratio is 0.57%.
The Broader Industry Context
The two funds respond to very different economic drivers. CARZ ties into long-term themes such as electrification, autonomous driving, and the artificial intelligence buildout that fuels demand for advanced semiconductors and memory. These secular tailwinds operate largely apart from short-term consumer sentiment, though the fund still faces exposure to cyclical chip pricing and global trade dynamics.
PEJ, on the other hand, serves as a direct bet on discretionary spending. Its results depend on travel demand, hotel and cruise pricing, airline capacity, live-event attendance, and the overall health of consumer balance sheets. Higher-for-longer interest rates, slower wage growth, or reduced services spending can pressure this exposure, while steady demand for experiences has supported the sector through recent cycles.
How Performance and Positioning Stack Up
In recent months the funds have moved in different directions that mirror their underlying drivers. CARZ has gained from ongoing momentum in semiconductor and large-cap technology names that have led broader market advances. Its global, tech-weighted makeup has generally delivered stronger and more consistent relative positioning during risk-on periods, though heavy concentration in growth stocks can magnify drawdowns when valuations adjust.
PEJ has displayed more cyclical, consumer-driven behavior. Travel and leisure holdings can rise sharply on solid bookings, yet the fund’s concentrated small- and mid-cap tilt makes it more volatile and more sensitive to interest-rate expectations and discretionary spending patterns. Compared with CARZ, PEJ’s performance has tended to be choppier, with sector rotation and earnings cycles in airlines, cruises, and hospitality shaping the swings.
Leveraging Tickeron’s AI Screener
In my research process I frequently turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to compare ETFs like these across technical patterns, fundamentals, and performance metrics. The tool lets me apply customizable filters for industry, volatility, and AI-driven signals, helping surface relevant data points more efficiently than manual review alone. This approach has proven useful when evaluating thematic versus cyclical exposures in the current environment.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on factors such as diversification, cost efficiency, trend consistency, sector momentum, and risk exposure, Tickeron’s AI currently favors CARZ over PEJ. CARZ’s broader global portfolio of roughly 100 names and its substantial allocation to secular technology and electrification themes provide greater structural strength and more consistent momentum through recent cycles. PEJ remains a valid option for tactical consumer-recovery exposure, but its concentrated and interest-rate-sensitive makeup carries comparatively higher volatility. This assessment is probabilistic and reflects current positioning rather than a forecast of future returns.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Momentum Indicator for PEJ turns positive, indicating new upward trend
PEJ saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 06, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 83 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 78 of the 83 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PEJ just turned positive on September 28, 2026. Looking at past instances where PEJ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 38 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
PEJ moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for PEJ crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 16 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +2.45% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PEJ advanced for three days, in 259 of 308 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 265 of 320 cases where PEJ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 83%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for PEJ moved out of overbought territory on October 30, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 37 of the 42 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 88%.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
PEJ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category ConsumerDiscretionary
Advertisement