Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Oct 24, 2026
Comparing DIVO and GPIQ: Two Distinct Approaches to Covered-Call Income

Comparing DIVO and GPIQ: Two Distinct Approaches to Covered-Call Income

Key Takeaways

  • Different underlying universes: DIVO draws from dividend-paying large caps across the S&P 500, while GPIQ is anchored to the growth-heavy Nasdaq-100.
  • Two flavors of covered-call income: DIVO writes tactical covered calls on individual stocks; GPIQ dynamically sells index-level call options on a portion of its portfolio.
  • Cost gap: GPIQ charges a 0.29% net expense ratio versus DIVO's 0.56%, a meaningful structural difference for long-term holders.
  • Risk profiles diverge: DIVO is defensive and diversified with a lower beta, while GPIQ carries concentrated technology exposure and higher volatility.
  • Income yield trade-off: GPIQ typically distributes a higher monthly yield, whereas DIVO offers a more balanced mix of income and price appreciation.

Setting the Stage for These Income Strategies

Income-focused investors increasingly compare derivative-income ETFs that pair equity exposure with options strategies, yet DIVO and GPIQ occupy different corners of this category. DIVO is an actively managed, dividend-growth portfolio of large-cap stocks overlaid with tactical call writing, while GPIQ wraps a dynamic covered-call strategy around the Nasdaq-100. They do not compete directly for the same dollar: DIVO suits investors seeking diversified, lower-volatility income, whereas GPIQ targets higher monthly distributions tied to growth and technology momentum. Understanding this structural split is essential to choosing the right tool for a portfolio. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the two line up on key metrics.

A Closer Look at DIVO

DIVO is an actively managed fund sub-advised by Capital Wealth Planning (CWP). It holds roughly 20 to 25 high-quality, dividend-paying large-cap stocks selected from the S&P 500, screening for earnings growth, cash flow, management quality, and a history of rising dividends. The fund tactically writes (sells) covered call options on individual holdings to generate additional income, and distributes income monthly.

The portfolio holds around 30 positions, including cash-like instruments. Top equity holdings have recently included MSFT, CAT, V, AAPL, AMGN, JPM, GS, and CVX. Sector allocation is intentionally balanced, with meaningful weightings in financials, technology, industrials, and health care, and no single sector exceeding roughly 30% of the portfolio. The expense ratio is 0.56%, and the fund has a lower market beta, reflecting its defensive, income-oriented construction.

Understanding GPIQ's Approach

GPIQ is an actively managed fund issued by Goldman Sachs Asset Management that invests in Nasdaq-100 constituents while dynamically selling index call options to generate income. Unlike a fully overwritten fund, GPIQ covers only a portion of its portfolio, allowing it to retain meaningful upside participation while still collecting option premium. It distributes monthly.

The fund holds roughly 100-plus stocks mirroring the Nasdaq-100. Top holdings are heavily weighted toward mega-cap technology, recently including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, MU, AMZN, GOOGL, AMD, META, AVGO, and TSLA. Technology alone represents roughly half of sector exposure, with communication services and consumer discretionary as secondary sleeves. The net expense ratio is 0.29%, and the fund carries a higher beta than DIVO, consistent with its growth-oriented underlying index.

The Broader Market Context

Both funds are shaped by the broader debate between defensive income and growth-oriented technology exposure. DIVO sits at the intersection of dividend growth and financials, industrials, and health care, sectors that tend to respond to interest-rate expectations, credit conditions, and earnings durability. GPIQ, by contrast, is dominated by semiconductor, software, and megacap technology names whose fortunes are tied to artificial-intelligence capital spending, cloud demand, and earnings cycles among large platforms.

In recent market cycles, options-based income ETFs have attracted strong capital flows as investors seek yield without fully abandoning equity upside. Rising volatility has historically lifted option premiums, benefiting both funds' income engines. However, sector rotation between value and growth, shifting rate expectations, and concentration risk among the largest technology stocks create divergent drivers for DIVO and GPIQ over time.

How They Stack Up in Performance and Positioning

In recent weeks and months, GPIQ's performance has been closely linked to Nasdaq-100 momentum, delivering a higher trailing distribution rate that has frequently exceeded 9%, funded largely by option premium and equity dividends. Its partial-overwrite design lets it capture a substantial share of index gains during rallies while cushioning modest declines.

DIVO has exhibited lower relative volatility and more balanced sector exposure, which tends to help it hold up during market drawdowns and periods of value rotation. Its yield, typically in the mid-single digits, is more modest than GPIQ's, but the fund has historically aimed for a steadier blend of income and capital appreciation rather than maximum payout. Investors should view DIVO as a defensive income sleeve and GPIQ as a higher-yield, higher-beta satellite position. From what I see, this distinction matters most for how each fits within a broader allocation.

Leveraging AI Tools in My ETF Research

When I compare ETFs like these, I frequently turn to Tickeron's AI-powered tools to cross-check yields, volatility profiles, and sector exposures against a wider universe. The AI Screener has proven especially useful for quickly identifying how different income strategies align with current market conditions and my own risk parameters. It streamlines the process without replacing the need for careful structural analysis.

My Verdict on DIVO vs GPIQ

Based on observable structural factors, I think GPIQ stands out for investors prioritizing income yield, cost efficiency, and trend-aligned technology exposure. Its lower expense ratio, strong sector momentum, and elevated distribution rate are compelling. However, for investors seeking diversified, lower-volatility positioning with more balanced sector exposure, DIVO would likely rank higher on risk-adjusted stability and defensive resilience. The appropriate choice depends on an investor's income requirement, tolerance for concentration risk, and view on growth versus value leadership in the months ahead. I'm watching this closely as market conditions evolve.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: DIVO, GPIQ

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


DIVO in upward trend: 10-day moving average crossed above 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026

The 10-day moving average for DIVO crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on DIVO as a result. In 68 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for DIVO just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where DIVO's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.

Following a +0.84% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where DIVO advanced for three days, in 281 of 341 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for DIVO moved out of overbought territory on October 22, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 38 of the 49 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 78%.

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 46 of 67 cases where DIVO's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.

DIVO moved below its 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where DIVO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.

DIVO broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for DIVO entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), Walmart (NASDAQ:WMT), JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM), VISA (NYSE:V), ABBVIE (NYSE:ABBV), Chevron Corp (NYSE:CVX), Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO).

Industry description

The investment seeks to provide current income as its primary investment objective and to provide capital appreciation as its secondary investment objective. Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in dividend-paying U.S. exchange-traded equity securities ("Equity Securities") and will opportunistically utilize an "option strategy" consisting of writing (selling) U.S. exchange-traded covered call options on such Equity Securities. The fund is non-diversified.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) ETF is 735.87B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 18.26B to 5.09T. NVDA holds the highest valuation in this group at 5.09T. The lowest valued company is CF at 18.26B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) ETF was -1%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 7%. UNH experienced the highest price growth at 4%, while CAT experienced the biggest fall at -6%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) ETF was -17%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was -8% and the average quarterly volume growth was -38%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 79
P/E Growth Rating: 49
Price Growth Rating: 37
SMR Rating: 32
Profit Risk Rating: 34
Seasonality Score: 38 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
DIVO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category Trading

Category
Derivative Income
Address
Amplify ETF Trust3250 Lacey Road, Suite 130Downers Grove
Phone
(630) 464-7600
Web
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
TSMX, a 2x daily leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund), rose roughly +19% over the trailing 30 days, rebounding sharply from mid-September lows. The fund seeks 200% of the daily return of TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), meaning its moves are roughly double the underlying stock's daily swings.
Contracted revenue anchor: A roughly $3.2 billion, seven-year LNG (liquefied natural gas) supply agreement with Puerto Rico has received final approval, providing multi-year cash-flow visibility if execution stays on track. Project pipeline inflection: Upcoming milestones include the Barcarena and PortoCem power plants in Brazil, a potential Gás Sul terminal restart, and optimization of the company's modular "Fast LNG" (FLNG) liquefaction fleet.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) designs central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and AI accelerators, while LRCX (Lam Research) supplies the wafer-fabrication equipment used to build advanced chips. AMD has delivered strong double-digit revenue growth on AI data-center demand, but its shares trade with elevated expectations that can trigger sharp reactions around earnings.
Origination momentum: Velocity Financial enters 2026 off record annual originations of roughly $2.7 billion (up about 48%), positioning it to keep gaining share in a fragmented investor-loan market. Credit normalization is the central watch item: Nonperforming loans fell toward the 8.5% range of portfolio unpaid principal balance (UPB), but asset quality remains the primary swing factor for earnings.
Turnaround milestone ahead: Management has pointed to reaching cash generation in 2027, making the pace of cost discipline and margin recovery the central question for the stock forecast. Fresh capital supports execution: A recently announced $45.5 million equity financing, with participation from management and a single institutional investor, strengthens the balance sheet as the company funds its transformation.
NFE closed at $5.51, down -6.13% during Tuesday's regular session, extending a slide that has pushed shares near a 52-week low. Primary catalyst: the company disclosed its Fast LNG unit is offline after a gas-turbine mechanical failure, with return to service not expected until Q4.
The central $11 target is the arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, rounded from roughly $10.75. With the stock near $2.06, reaching $11 would require an upside of more than 400%, an extremely large move.
The $23 central target is the rounded arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, which average $23.25. The latest verified price is around $9.57, meaning the target implies roughly 140% upside—a very large move.
NXH closed down -11.17% (-$0.23) to $1.83 on Oct 6, the most recent regular session, extending a steep two-day decline. Selling continued as investors digested the mutual termination of the Fathom Holdings merger and a dilutive $45.5M registered direct offering of ~16.5M shares at $2.76.
AMD is a large-cap designer of CPUs (central processing units) and GPUs (graphics processing units) competing directly with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market, while FORM is a small-cap provider of semiconductor test and measurement equipment, primarily probe cards. AMD's narrative has been driven by multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler deals, while FORM's has been powered by record revenue and sharp margin expansion tied to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand.
AMD has surged roughly 200% year to date, crossing a $1 trillion market capitalization on AI data-center demand and a "CPU renaissance" narrative. KLAC has gained about 71% year to date, supported by record process-control revenue and rapid growth in advanced packaging for AI chips.
AMD is a large-cap semiconductor designer riding explosive AI compute demand, while ENTG is a mid-cap supplier of materials and purity solutions that feed the same AI-driven chip cycle. AMD recently crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization on surging data center revenue, whereas ENTG operates at a far smaller scale (roughly $23 billion) with steadier, double-digit growth.
VELO closed Tuesday at $9.57, unchanged (+0.00%) from the prior session, with the move occurring during regular market hours. The flat close marked stabilization after Monday's -14.5% plunge, when shares fell to $9.57 from $11.20 following disclosure of CFO James Suva's departure.
The $8 target used here is a technical, publicly discussed recovery objective — not an analyst consensus — because legacy analyst price targets were set before NFE's restructuring and reverse stock split. New Fortress Energy Inc. ( NFE ) trades near $5.51, so reaching $8 implies a roughly 45% advance.
AVBP plunged -46.98% during Tuesday's regular session, closing at $15.09 versus $28.46, marking its worst single-day decline on record. The catalyst was the Phase 3 FURVENT trial of firmonertinib failing its primary endpoint—progression-free survival—in first-line EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer.
Upcoming catalyst: The company's next earnings release is estimated for November 6, 2026, which should offer fresh detail on its SKY token holdings, staking rewards, and treasury strategy. Strategic positioning: SDEV is an on-chain holding company providing public-market exposure to the Sky protocol ecosystem, with SKY as its core digital asset and a stated focus on the stablecoin economy.
Different roles in the chip ecosystem: AMAT is a materials-engineering and deposition leader, while KLAC dominates process control, inspection, and yield management. Momentum favors AMAT: AMAT shares have more than doubled this year, while KLAC has recently pulled back roughly 9% in a month on margin and execution concerns.