Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Apr 13, 2026
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): What Q1 2026 Earnings Could Reveal About Investment Banking Leaders

Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): What Q1 2026 Earnings Could Reveal About Investment Banking Leaders

Key Takeaways

  • Goldman Sachs (GS) reports Q1 2026 earnings on April 13, with consensus EPS of $16.34 and revenue of $16.95 billion, signaling 16% EPS growth year-over-year.
  • Morgan Stanley (MS) follows on April 15, expecting EPS of $3.02 and revenue of $19.71 billion, up 16% in EPS.
  • Both firms lead in investment banking (IB) fees; GS topped 2025 M&A revenue at $4.6 billion, while MS saw Q4 IB surge 47% to $2.41 billion.
  • GS dominates trading with record 2025 equities revenue of $16.5 billion; MS excels in wealth management with $9.3 trillion client assets.
  • Return on tangible common equity (ROTCE, a profitability measure adjusted for intangibles) hit 17.1% for GS in Q4 2025 and 21.8% for MS, highlighting strong capital efficiency.
  • Q1 previews point to sustained momentum in IB and trading amid market volatility.

Earnings Context and Why This Comparison Matters

As we approach the Q1 2026 earnings season, I'm paying close attention to GS and MS, two powerhouse investment banks that compete head-on in advisory, underwriting, trading, and asset management. Their reports, due on April 13 and 15 respectively, should shed light on the ongoing recovery in dealmaking and how they're navigating trading dynamics. Both capitalized on the 2025 investment banking rebound, with GS taking the lead in M&A and MS making gains in debt underwriting. What stands out to me in this matchup is their strategic divergence: GS's emphasis on high-margin Global Banking & Markets compared to MS's broader wealth management platform, all set against a backdrop of heightened client activity and market swings.

Spotlight on Goldman Sachs

GS kicks off with its Q1 2026 results on April 13, covering the quarter through March 31. Analysts are forecasting EPS of $16.34, a 16% jump from $14.12 a year ago, alongside revenue of $16.95 billion, up 13%. The spotlight will be on Global Banking & Markets, projected at $12.65 billion (an 18% increase), powered by investment banking fees of $2.42 billion (26% growth), FICC intermediation, and strong equities financing. Building on Q4 2025's $13.45 billion revenue and $14.01 EPS—which beat estimates by 20%—the firm's 2025 highlights, including $9.34 billion in annual IB fees and a record $16.54 billion in equities revenue, suggest continued strength. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how GS stacks up against peers in trading metrics. Asset & Wealth Management fees reached a record $11.54 billion for the year, adding a layer of stability.

Morgan Stanley's Outlook

MS follows suit on April 15 for its Q1 2026 earnings. Expectations center on $3.02 EPS (16% growth) and $19.71 billion in revenue (11% up). Institutional Securities is anticipated at $9.80 billion (9% increase), featuring IB fees of $2.02 billion (30% growth), while Wealth Management net revenues may hit $8.51 billion (16% rise), driven by $2.17 billion in net interest income. In Q4 2025, MS posted $17.9 billion revenue and $2.68 EPS (beating by 11%), capping a record $70.6 billion annual revenue with 21.6% ROTCE. Wealth Management added $356 billion in net new assets, pushing total client assets to $9.3 trillion, and Institutional Securities delivered $33.1 billion for the year, reinforcing its IB prowess.

Head-to-Head: Earnings and Market Positions

In scale, GS holds an edge in investment banking, topping 2025 M&A revenue at $4.6 billion against MS's $3 billion, complemented by standout equities trading at $16.5 billion annually. MS balances this with diversified streams, Wealth pre-tax margins approaching 30%, and a higher ROTCE (21.6% versus GS's 16%). Growth in IB and trading looks solid for both, though MS's $9.3 trillion AUM provides a buffer. Potential headwinds include volatility hitting FICC and equities, plus regulatory scrutiny on capital. From what I see, sentiment leans toward GS for trading potential and MS for wealth durability.

AI Screener

In my own research, I rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener—an AI-powered tool for discovering stocks and ETFs by filtering on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI signals. It lets you scan thousands of assets with custom criteria like industry, market cap, indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics, surfacing trade ideas, breakouts, and opportunities faster than manual methods. I find it invaluable for comparisons like this one between GS and MS. Check out the AI Screener to refine your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron AI currently favors GS with a 65% probability edge over MS, citing superior IB positioning, trading strength, and Q1 growth trajectory despite MS's wealth stability. I'm watching this closely as earnings unfold.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: GS, MS

GS sees its Stochastic Oscillator ascends from oversold territory

On July 07, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for GS moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 53 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In of the 53 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GS advanced for three days, in of 354 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 290 cases where GS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for GS moved out of overbought territory on June 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 41 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 41 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on June 26, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GS as a result. In of 77 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for GS turned negative on June 24, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GS declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 85, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. GS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.785) is normal, around the industry mean (3.857). P/E Ratio (18.806) is within average values for comparable stocks, (48.813). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.547) is also within normal values, averaging (1.817). Dividend Yield (0.016) settles around the average of (0.034) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.339) is also within normal values, averaging (31.344).

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS), Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS), Charles Schwab Corp (The) (NYSE:SCHW), Gold.com Inc. (NYSE:GOLD).

Industry description

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Investment Banks/Brokers Industry is 14.06B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 13 to 928.5B. PKRSF holds the highest valuation in this group at 928.5B. The lowest valued company is BFCH at 13.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Investment Banks/Brokers Industry was -2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -5%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15%. GREE experienced the highest price growth at 15%, while ABTC experienced the biggest fall at -95%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Investment Banks/Brokers Industry was -24%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -40% and the average quarterly volume growth was -29%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 61
P/E Growth Rating: 69
Price Growth Rating: 59
SMR Rating: 76
Profit Risk Rating: 84
Seasonality Score: 14 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
GS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a provider of investment banking, securities and asset management services

Industry InvestmentBanksBrokers

Profile
Details
Industry
Investment Banks Or Brokers
Address
200 West Street
Phone
+1 212 902-1000
Employees
45300
Web
https://www.goldmansachs.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Aon plc (AON) reported third-quarter 2025 revenue of $3.997 billion, representing a 7% year-over-year increase with equal organic growth. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $3.05, exceeding expectations. In late November, Moody’s reaffirmed Aon’s Baa2 credit rating and revised the outlook to positive, citing reduced leverage following the NFP acquisition.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) entered the spotlight after announcing advanced discussions with Yara International on December 8 to collaborate on low-emission ammonia projects. While the strategic direction aligns with global decarbonization trends, uncertainty around execution and capital requirements triggered a 9.45% one-day decline in the stock.
Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation are two of the most prominent names in the aerospace and defense industry, both positioned to benefit from heightened global security concerns and sustained U.S. military spending.
As 2025 winds down, the Savings Banks sector reflects a mix of stability, innovation, and AI-driven disruption. Among the most closely watched tickers—SOFI Technologies (SOFI), Ally Financial (ALLY), and PayPal Holdings (PYPL)—investors have witnessed contrasting stories of growth, valuation, and market perception.
Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is a wireless technology company focused on delivering secure, long-range communications for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and data networking applications. Its solutions are built to support mission-critical operations across sectors such as rail, energy, maritime, infrastructure, and industrial automation.
Ciena’s growth is driven by expanding offerings in optical networking, network automation software, and 5G transport infrastructure, complemented by services designed to help customers modernize and future-proof their networks. Its evolving technology portfolio addresses the rising complexity, speed, and reliability requirements of today’s communications environment.
Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) are two leading companies in the Bitcoin mining industry, each operating energy-intensive infrastructure to capitalize on cryptocurrency market cycles. This comparison is especially relevant amid ongoing Bitcoin price volatility and growing interest in digital assets and AI-related infrastructure.
Roivant Sciences has delivered strong year-to-date performance, with shares up roughly 82%, driven by encouraging pipeline developments and increased investment in high-potential subsidiaries such as Immunovant.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) are central to the United States’ push to establish a secure, domestic supply of rare earth elements—materials critical to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and defense technologies. As geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities intensify, these two companies offer distinct approaches to addressing U.S. dependence on foreign sources.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) remains one of the most closely followed ETFs worldwide, offering investors direct exposure to the NASDAQ-100 Index®. In the most recent data, QQQ has gained a notable +20.16% year-to-date, even as markets experienced bouts of elevated volatility.
Sidus Space has expanded its portfolio in 2025, focusing on satellite missions and supporting technologies to enhance space infrastructure. Key product advancements include the LizzieSat platforms, with multiple units progressing in design and manufacturing. LizzieSat-3 is set for launch no earlier than Q1 2025, building on prior missions to boost data capabilities for clients in Earth observation and communication.
As 2025 comes to a close, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) continues to strengthen its position in China’s competitive fresh grocery e-commerce market. Operating from Shanghai, the company focuses on high-quality fresh produce, ready-to-eat meals, and daily essentials delivered directly to consumers. Throughout the year, Dingdong emphasized private-label expansion, supply-chain optimization, and fulfillment network growth—initiatives that supported improving quarterly performance and positioned the company for sustained momentum.
Pioneer Power's 2025 highlights include the expansion of its mobile power and charging footprint with new orders and partnerships; the launch of a new suite of e-Boost solutions for off-grid EV charging; the rebranding of HomeBoost as PowerCore with events in December; the introduction of PRYMUS in December; and a new five-year contract for network transformers with a regional utility provider.
An AI-driven comparison between Palantir (PLTR) and Oracle (ORCL) points to Palantir as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights PLTR’s AI-native platforms, which enable real-time, data-driven decision-making across fast-growing sectors such as government, defense, and enterprise analytics.
An AI-driven comparison between D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and IonQ (IONQ) points to IonQ as the stronger opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights IONQ’s gate-based, trapped-ion quantum architecture, which supports a wide range of algorithms and positions the company for broader adoption across AI, simulation, and cryptography.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) points to Rigetti as the more compelling opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RGTI’s gate-based quantum architecture, which supports universal quantum computing and a wide range of complex algorithms. While D-Wave remains a leader in quantum annealing for optimization problems, Rigetti’s full-stack, gate-based approach offers greater scalability and broader long-term applications.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and TeraWulf (WULF) points to TeraWulf as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes WULF’s large-scale digital infrastructure supporting Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC), which generates immediate revenue in expanding digital asset and AI-driven markets.
An AI-driven comparison between Rocket Lab USA (RKLB) and Planet Labs (PL) identifies Rocket Lab as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RKLB’s vertically integrated space services and consistent launch performance, which position the company to benefit from rising demand for satellite deployment and space infrastructure.
An AI-driven comparison of Tempus AI (TEM) and Doximity (DOCS) points to Tempus AI as the more compelling investment opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights TEM’s AI-powered precision medicine platform, which applies advanced analytics and genomic data to transform diagnostics and treatment in oncology and cardiology.
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): What Q1 2026 Earnings Could Reveal About Investment Banking Leaders