Go to the list of all blogs
Allana's Avatar
published in Blogs
Feb 10, 2021
One Reason Everyone Needs Blockchain

One Reason Everyone Needs Blockchain

One Reason Everyone Needs Blockchain

Big data rules the world. Our everyday lives are filled with products – the smartphones we can’t live without, the websites we browse, even the thermostats in our homes. These smart products gather raw data for companies to store, analyze, and use, and then the raw data takes on exponentially greater value as more and more companies find increasingly efficient and intelligent ways to mine and interpret it. So why are big companies, not individuals, the ones who seem to profit? Blockchain may change this outcome.

A big advantage

The world’s largest companies (like Facebook, Netflix, Google, and Apple in the US and Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent in China) have a significant advantage in the race to accumulate data because of their size – they have the vast reach, and by extension the capital, to collect, store, and analyze the massive amounts of information they gather. They also have the resources to hire the cream of the crop in data science and AI, who then build models to understand the data. The more data stored and analyzed, the more accurate the model. The result is self-fulfilling prophecy – the biggest and best get bigger and better. 

Is that really a bad thing?

The fact that large companies have taken advantage of their resources to better interact with data is not inherently negative, nor surprising. But there are problematic aspects to their dominance – one major one is that the barrier to entry becomes so high that innovation is limited to the companies with the capital to get involved. It also means that important information about their AI models remains behind closed doors. This isn’t an issue when it comes to our interactions with Siri, but it is significant when multiple publications detail how an AI model used for helping to sentence criminals is racially biased, and the manufacturer of the model refuses to discuss its makeup or allow others to examine the nuts and bolts that contribute to its behavior.

 

 

So, what can be done?

There is a potential way to neutralize, or at least lessen, these advantages – blockchain. Blockchains are defined most simply as structures of data linked and secured using cryptography, and they have potential to shift more and more power to algorithm builders and everyday people. They provide a way to take ownership of personal information in a world where data is commoditized; additionally, they offer a method to make information available to AI builders who may not work at a large company. The potential result is more accurate AI models, with the benefit of security and transparency.

Multiple networks exist that aim to reward people for sharing their information in a decentralized data marketplace – we will focus on Ocean Protocol, SingularityNet, SEED, and Tickeron.

Ocean Protocol

Ocean Protocol’s goal is to build a “decentralized data exchange protocol and network that incentivizes the publishing of data for use in the training of artificial intelligence models.” In layman’s terms: you are compensated (in Ocean tokens) if you upload data to the Ocean network and your personal data is used to train AI models.

This is valuable for multiple reasons. Take a Nest thermostat – Nest is constantly sending information from its users to Google, who receive it for free. With their significant resources, it wouldn’t be a stretch to imagine the company building an AI service that, through data, identifies when to contact you about replacing your windows. With a decentralized marketplace like Ocean’s, an ambitious AI scientist can license your data and use it to build their own service. Through blockchain, there is a cost-effective way to lease or buy your data while signifying clear ownership and maintaining data integrity (by confirming it is from a trusted source). Everyone is happy, and the risk of bias or error in the data is minimized by transparency.

SingularityNet

SingularityNet is working to be the first AI-as-a-service, blockchain-based marketplace. Their goal is to help the enterprising AI scientist in our previous example sell or rent her model to other scientists to use with their datasets. A search engine even helps users to find and integrate a model with additional complementary models. This would be useful if, for example, AI scientist #1 wrote a model studying home energy markets in San Francisco. Scientist #1 could combine that with models studying Oakland, Palo Alto, and San Jose, providing additional insight into energy consumption. Blockchain makes it clear the model is Alice’s intellectual property, and she would be compensated in SingularityNet tokens when someone uses her model. 

SEED

SEED is working to help us trust the increasingly-popular bots (think Apple’s Siri or Amazon’s Alexa) around us. As the bot market grows, according to SEED, from an estimated “$3 billion to $20 billion by 2021”, the chance of encountering a biased, inaccurate, or hijacked bot increases. SEED has established an open-source, decentralized network where any bot interactions can be viewed and verified. It provides the skeleton necessary to ensure that information fed into the bot can be assigned to an owner, who can then be compensated. Their marketplace allows bot creators to license or sell their builds to those who might need to use them, and their tokens compensate creators and data owners for the value they create within the SEED network. These services mean higher confidence in the quality of the bot and greater protection for user’s data.

Tickeron

Investors know that flipping on CNBC at any given time during the day means hearing a wide array of market forecasts and predictions. Whether it’s a stock or an industry that’s headed skyward or due for plummet, the sheer volume of advice is mind-boggling. Tickeron identified this as a major issue when it comes to financial intelligence, which Tickeron calls “FinIP.” How can the consumer know that they’re getting advice from a pundit or market analyst who is trustworthy, smart, and most importantly, who is right more often than they’re wrong? As it stands today, there is very little accountability for the talking heads who give all sorts of financial advice on a daily basis. That creates a problem for the consumer, because it is impossible to know which advice is actually valuable. 

But there is another problem in the world of FinIP – it is really only the behemoth Wall St. firms with huge marketing budgets who get traction on the web. What about the data scientist or quant who has no marketing budget but who has built a platform that can beat the market? How can they show the world of consumers and investors how successful their platform is? And most importantly, what mechanism exists for giving the consumer a trustworthy account of the advisor’s track record? 

Tickeron is seeking to use blockchain to change how the world of financial advice works. They are an SEC-regulated internet financial advisor that has developed a decentralized “marketplace” of artificial and human intelligence for the financial industry, where advisors and people making predictions have their track records logged and evaluated. The end result is having all of the participants in the marketplace establish verifiable seller reputations, which makes it easy for the consumer to know whose advice is superior. Tickeron’s marketplace would also establish a “protocol of commerce,” which would create a secure exchange between the creators of financial intelligence and consumers of it. 

A Promising Future

Blockchain-based AI is still in its nascent stages, but as blockchain becomes mainstream, increasingly more data will hit decentralized marketplaces. Everyday people will be able to monetize their personal data, developers will be rewarded for their contributions to the marketplace, and open, transparent systems will be the rule, not the exception.

Related Ticker: NFLX

Contributor

Allana's AvatarAllana|Expert

Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.


NFLX in upward trend: 10-day moving average crossed above 50-day moving average on August 14, 2026

The 10-day moving average for NFLX crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on August 14, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where NFLX's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 36 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on July 31, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NFLX as a result. In of 76 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NFLX just turned positive on July 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where NFLX's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

NFLX moved above its 50-day moving average on August 13, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NFLX advanced for three days, in of 313 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 269 cases where NFLX Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 17 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NFLX declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

NFLX broke above its upper Bollinger Band on August 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. NFLX’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NFLX’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock worse than average.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (10.989) is normal, around the industry mean (20.801). P/E Ratio (25.028) is within average values for comparable stocks, (112.428). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.781) is also within normal values, averaging (12.042). NFLX has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.015). P/S Ratio (7.082) is also within normal values, averaging (2.960).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ:NFLX), Walt Disney Company (The) (NYSE:DIS), Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU), Paramount Skydance Corporation (NASDAQ:PSKY), AMC Entertainment Holdings (NYSE:AMC), iQIYI (NASDAQ:IQ), HUYA (NYSE:HUYA).

Industry description

Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Movies/Entertainment Industry is 18.01B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 134 to 331.41B. NFLX holds the highest valuation in this group at 331.41B. The lowest valued company is LRDG at 134.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Movies/Entertainment Industry was -2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 8%. NIPG experienced the highest price growth at 42%, while FTRK experienced the biggest fall at -44%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Movies/Entertainment Industry was -23%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -36% and the average quarterly volume growth was -51%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 63
P/E Growth Rating: 50
Price Growth Rating: 51
SMR Rating: 82
Profit Risk Rating: 74
Seasonality Score: -19 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
NFLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a provider of online movie rental subscription services

Industry MoviesEntertainment

Profile
Details
Industry
Cable Or Satellite TV
Address
121 Albright Way
Phone
+1 408 540-3700
Employees
16000
Web
https://www.netflix.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Quantum Computing Inc. completed a $110 million acquisition of Luminar Semiconductor on February 2, significantly strengthening its photonics and manufacturing capabilities. Shares have traded with elevated volatility, peaking near $12.70 in mid-January before retreating to the $9 range amid heavy volume.
ERII shares have remained resilient, trading near $15.47 ahead of Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings scheduled for February 25, 2026. Q3 2025 results exceeded expectations, with revenue of $32 million and EPS of $0.07, despite year-over-year declines tied to project timing.
Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) has experienced pronounced swings in recent weeks, touching multiyear lows before staging a sharp recovery. The stock continues to trade within a wide 52-week range, closely tied to the value of its Charter Communications stake and investor expectations around the proposed merger.
Arm Holdings (ARM) shares have demonstrated resilience in recent sessions, rebounding after an initial earnings-related pullback and stabilizing near technical support levels. While smartphone-related headwinds tied to memory shortages pressured sentiment, momentum in AI-driven data center royalties helped restore confidence.
Shell plc (SHEL) reported Q4 2025 adjusted earnings of $3.3 billion, below expectations due to weaker oil prices and non-cash tax charges. Full-year adjusted earnings reached $18.5 billion, supported by strong LNG and upstream operations. A 4% dividend increase to $0.372 per share and a new $3.5 billion buyback program reinforce capital return commitments.
Linde (LIN) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $4.20, topping estimates, with full-year revenue reaching $34 billion. 2026 EPS guidance of $17.40–$17.90 implies 6–9% growth, supported by a record $10 billion project backlog.
ConocoPhillips (COP) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.02, missing estimates due to weaker oil prices. Full-year adjusted earnings totaled $7.7 billion, with $19.9 billion in operating cash flow. Shares have gained more than 10% in recent weeks, supported by analyst upgrades and sector momentum.
Verisk Analytics (VRSK) delivered Q4 2025 revenue of $779 million, up 5.9% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $1.82, beating expectations. Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reported Q3 FY2026 revenue of $2.62 billion, down 10.2% year over year, but adjusted diluted EPS climbed 14% to $1.77, well above estimates.
(OMC) Omnicom’s fourth-quarter report, released February 18, 2026, marked its first earnings update incorporating results from Interpublic Group (IPG), acquired on November 26, 2025. The combination created the world’s largest marketing services firm by revenue, a significant milestone as the advertising industry consolidates and adapts to digital transformation.
Copart (CPRT) is set to report fiscal Q2 2026 earnings on February 19, 2026, after market close. Consensus calls for EPS of $0.39–$0.40 and revenue of $1.15–$1.18 billion. Global Payments (GPN) posted Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $3.18, in line with expectations, and adjusted net revenue of $2.32 billion, up 6% in constant currency (excluding dispositions). Thomson Reuters (TRI) delivered Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.07 and revenue of $2.01 billion, up 5% year over year, supported by recurring subscription growth.
Unilever PLC (UL) leads year-to-date performance with a 12.61% gain, ahead of Diageo plc (DEO) at 9.90% and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) at 4.27%. DEO offers the highest dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with KDP (3.16%) and UL (2.97%). All three stocks carry low betas—DEO (0.18), UL (0.24), and KDP (0.35)—highlighting their defensive characteristics.
Q1 Fiscal 2026 Results: Revenue of $333M and adjusted EBITDA of $50M (15% margin), exceeding analyst expectations. FY2026 Guidance Raised: Adjusted EBITDA now projected at $225M, with revenue reaffirmed near $1.5B. EV Backlog Growth: 855 electric buses worth $277M, highlighting robust demand supported by EPA clean bus funding.
IBM fell over 10% today mainly because a new AI tool from Anthropic is seen as a direct threat to IBM’s lucrative COBOL modernization and consulting business, triggering worries that key legacy‑modernization revenue will be automated away.
Today’s drop is mainly about competitive positioning and future growth expectations, not an immediate collapse of current Wegovy/Ozempic sales, but it signals that Novo may not have the strongest next‑wave obesity drug versus Eli Lilly, which is why the stock sold off so sharply.
RNG (RingCentral) dropped over 12% today mainly as a sharp pullback after a very steep recent run‑up driven by upbeat Q4 results, guidance, and capital‑return news, with profit‑taking amplified by valuation concerns and a weak broader tech tap
Fundamentally, the latest public guidance is still for rapid growth and profitability, but today’s drop reflects a reset of sentiment and valuation rather than a brand‑new deterioration in those targets. For investors, the key question is whether the current price appropriately reflects execution risk, competition in diagnostics, and macro volatility after the guidance‑driven rally and subsequent reversal.
TNC (Tennant Company) is down more than 25% today because it reported a very large earnings and revenue miss for Q4 2025, blamed on serious ERP rollout problems and weaker demand, and guided to a slower‑than‑hoped recovery in 2026.
XMTR (Xometry) is down more than 21% today because, despite reporting record growth and an earnings beat, the company announced a CEO transition and investors used the news to take profits after a big prior run‑up, with heavy short interest amplifying the drop.
EDSA (Edesa Biotech) is up more than 21% today largely on speculative trading in a very illiquid penny stock with no clear, company‑specific news catalyst, likely driven by technical factors, retail flows, and short‑term trading rather than fundamentals.
Q4 2025 revenue came in strong at about 214–215 million, up mid‑30s percent year over year and a few percent above estimates, but GAAP EPS was only 0.08 versus expectations around 0.31, a roughly 70–75% miss and down from 0.13 a year earlier.