Swing Trader: Sector Rotation Strategy (TA&FA) Generates 25.23% for TROW
The implementation of the Sector Rotation Strategy through both technical and fundamental analysis (TA&FA) has proven incredibly profitable for TROW (T. Rowe Price Group), with a substantial gain of 25.23%.
A robust upward trend has been identified in TROW's recent performance. A pivotal event occurred on June 22, 2023, when TROW's price notably broke its lower Bollinger Band, a commonly used tool in technical analysis. When a price breaks through this lower band, it often signifies a potential reversal point, hinting toward an upcoming rise in stock price.
Anticipating the pattern of such occurrences, traders might find it strategically beneficial to consider purchasing the stock or exploring call options. Bollinger Bands are excellent market indicators and the recent move suggests an imminent swing to the upside.
Historical trends solidify this perspective. In the case of TROW, 26 out of 34 instances where the price broke its lower Bollinger Band have been followed by a price rise in the subsequent month. This statistic yields a probability of 76% for a continued upward trend, presenting a highly optimistic outlook for the stock in the near future.
This valuable data aids traders to capitalize on potential bullish trends, providing an opportunity to take advantage of the expected increase in TROW's value. The significant 25.23% generated by the sector rotation strategy demonstrates the effectiveness of this methodology, particularly when combined with both technical and fundamental analysis.
Investors using these predictive indicators and historical data can make informed decisions about when to enter or exit a position, ensuring they can benefit from any swing in price. As TROW continues to exhibit strong performance, it is an ideal candidate for such a strategy, promising substantial returns for savvy traders.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TROW turned positive on April 11, 2025. Looking at past instances where TROW's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 51 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where TROW's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 34 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on April 30, 2025. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TROW as a result. In of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TROW advanced for three days, in of 334 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
TROW may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TROW declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator for TROW entered a downward trend on April 15, 2025. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. TROW’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.832) is normal, around the industry mean (2.779). P/E Ratio (15.509) is within average values for comparable stocks, (27.202). TROW's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (6.314) is slightly higher than the industry average of (3.172). Dividend Yield (0.041) settles around the average of (0.071) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.188) is also within normal values, averaging (11.704).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TROW’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 69, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of investment management services
Industry InvestmentManagers