The AI trading bot available at Swing Trader has been generating impressive returns of 4.02% for CEI over the past 6 months, using the Volatility Balanced Strategy v.2 (TA). However, recent market analysis has shown that CEI's RSI indicator has moved out of the overbought zone, potentially indicating a shift in trend from upward to downward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor has identified 19 similar instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone, and in all cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. With odds of a move down at 90%, traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The AI trading bot available at Swing Trader has been generating consistent returns for CEI, with a total return of 4.02% over the past 6 months, using the Swing Trader ($6K per position): Volatility Balanced Strategy v.2 (TA). However, traders must also consider other factors that can influence a stock's movement in the market. One such factor is the Relative Strength Index (RSI) Indicator, which measures the strength of a stock's price movement.
Recently, CEI's 10-day RSI Oscillator moved out of overbought territory on April 04, 2023, indicating that the stock may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. This may be a cause for concern for investors who hold CEI stocks or are considering investing in them.
To better understand the potential impact of the RSI indicator on CEI's stock price, Tickeron's A.I.dvisor analyzed 19 instances where the RSI indicator moved out of the overbought zone for CEI. In all cases, the stock price moved lower in the following days. Based on this analysis, the odds of a move down for CEI are at 90%.
In light of this analysis, traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options to protect their investments. While the AI trading bot at Swing Trader has been generating impressive returns, it is important to remain vigilant and monitor market indicators such as the RSI to make informed trading decisions.
CEIN saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on July 03, 2025. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 78 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In of the 78 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at .
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CEIN declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
CEIN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on June 20, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CEIN entered a downward trend on June 18, 2025. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. of 67 cases where CEIN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CEIN just turned positive on June 13, 2025. Looking at past instances where CEIN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 33 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
CEIN moved above its 50-day moving average on July 07, 2025 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +2 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CEIN advanced for three days, in of 193 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows