Go to the list of all blogs
Harry Richardson's Avatar
published in Blogs
Jul 01, 2020
The Race to a COVID-19 Vaccine

The Race to a COVID-19 Vaccine

The COVID-19 virus has wreaked havoc on countries around the globe in 2020, both in medical terms and economic ones. When the virus first popped up in the Wuhan province of China, local authorities took note of how quickly the virus spread. They took actions to shut down businesses and to limit public interactions between citizens. This became somewhat of a playbook for other countries as the virus spread around the world. The virus has taken a great toll on almost every economy around the world.

Many pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms are working on vaccines for the COVID-19 virus. By the time they are finished, there will likely be more than one that ends up getting approval from Federal Drug Administration in the United States. Other countries will likely have multiple options at some point in the future as well.

As an investor, trying to pick which company will be the ultimate winner is like trying to pick the winner of the Kentucky Derby. You have a number of horses in the field to choose from, but do you put all of your money on one horse? Or do you spread your money out and bet on a couple of different horses?

There are pharma giants like Merck (NYSE: MRK), Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) in the mix. But there are also smaller firms like Novavax (Nasdaq: NVAX), Inovio Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: INO), and Moderna Biotechnology (Nasdaq: MRNA) that are in the mix as well.

Obviously the company that creates a successful vaccine will benefit greatly, but for some of the companies that are working on one, it could be a potential make or break moment for their stock. If it is a company like Merck that is first to bring a vaccine to market, it will be a huge boost to revenue for the company. But the company isn’t going to go out of business if it isn’t first. For a company like Moderna that has seen its stock jump more than triple since late February, it could be critical for the company to be one of the first companies with a viable vaccine.

Sticking with the horse racing comparison, you could consider it betting on one of the favorites versus betting on a long shot. Sure the long shot can come in and payoff in a big way, but the safer play is to bet on one of the favorites.

I took 10 stocks that are working on vaccines and created a watchlist on Tickeron. I included seven major pharmaceutical and biotech firms and I included the three smaller ones that I mentioned earlier. Once I had the list built, I sorted them by the fundamental analysis scores on the screener.

The screener showed that Astrazeneca (NYSE: AZN) is the top rated stock of the bunch with five of the seven categories coming in the positive range. Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) was the second highest rated with five positive readings and two negative ratings. Glaxosmithkline (NYSE: GSK) is third with three positive ratings and three neutral ratings.

We see the three smaller firms at the bottom of the ratings with Moderna at the very bottom. The screener shows five ratings in the negative range, one in the neutral range, and one where there was no rating. This didn't surprise me necessarily because these companies don't have the strong earnings growth of the bigger companies and they don't have the strong readings from the indicators that make up the SMR indicator.

After looking at the fundamentals, I flipped over to the technical analysis screener to see which of the stocks were rated the strongest there. Lilly was the top rated stock on the technical analysis screener with four positive ratings and two neutral ratings. There was a surprise stock in the number two spot and that was Inovio Pharmaceuticals. The stock has three indicators in the positive range and only one negative reading.

Moderna was once again at the bottom of the list with four indicators producing negative readings and only one producing a positive reading. Sanofi was the second worst on the technical analysis screen with two negative readings and no positive readings. 

So what does of all of this mean and how should you try to invest in order to benefit from a COVID-19 vaccine? You could invest in all 10 of these stocks and take your chances, but not even that would guarantee that you had the winner. There are other companies working on a vaccine, these just happen to be the frontrunners at this time. You could buy all three of the smaller companies and hope it's one of them that hits paydirt, but all three stocks have ramped up quite a bit over the last few months.

Personally I like Eli Lilly, even if it doesn't reach the market with a vaccine first. The company has seen earnings and revenue grow at solid rates over the last few years and there isn't any reason to think that won't continue. You could look to buy one or two of the bigger players, maybe Lilly and Astrazeneca since they rank the best when you weigh the fundamentals and technicals equally. Maybe add one of the smaller companies in with those two as a third stock in the portfolio. In that case, Inovio ranks the best when you look at a combination of technical analysis and fundamentals.

Going back to the horse racing analogy, if you were to use that last scenario with Lilly, Astrazeneca, and Inovio, you have three different stocks. Even if they aren't the first ones to market with a vaccine, Lilly and Astrazeneca aren't necessarily going to drop a lot. If they are one of the first to market with a vaccine, they can still see a significant upside move. Inovio is the kind of the long shot of the three. It would be a huge victory for the company if it were to be one of the first to market with a successful vaccine. While the stock has jumped six-fold since the end of February, it could still see significant gains. With a combination of solid stocks like Lilly and Astrazeneca and the potential of a stock like Inovio, you are spreading your risk around, but keeping a tremendous upside potential.

Related Ticker: MRK

Aroon Indicator for MRK shows an upward move is likely

MRK's Aroon Indicator triggered a bullish signal on June 29, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor detected that the AroonUp green line is above 70 while the AroonDown red line is below 30. When the up indicator moves above 70 and the down indicator remains below 30, it is a sign that the stock could be setting up for a bullish move. Traders may want to buy the stock or look to buy calls options. A.I.dvisor looked at 240 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator showed a similar pattern. In of the 240 cases, the stock moved higher in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move higher at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on June 23, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MRK as a result. In of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MRK just turned positive on June 24, 2026. Looking at past instances where MRK's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

MRK moved above its 50-day moving average on June 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MRK advanced for three days, in of 341 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for MRK moved out of overbought territory on July 01, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 35 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 35 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MRK declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

MRK broke above its upper Bollinger Band on June 25, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.784) is normal, around the industry mean (19.926). P/E Ratio (35.490) is within average values for comparable stocks, (28.354). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (6.225) is also within normal values, averaging (3.932). Dividend Yield (0.027) settles around the average of (0.031) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.773) is also within normal values, averaging (4.255).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. MRK’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 63, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Eli Lilly & Co (NYSE:LLY), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), ABBVIE (NYSE:ABBV), Merck & Co (NYSE:MRK), AstraZeneca PLC (NYSE:AZN), Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN), Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD), Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), Bristol-Myers Squibb Co (NYSE:BMY), Biogen (NASDAQ:BIIB).

Industry description

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Pharmaceuticals: Major Industry is 198.11B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 72.83K to 1.08T. LLY holds the highest valuation in this group at 1.08T. The lowest valued company is CRXTQ at 72.83K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Pharmaceuticals: Major Industry was -2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 16%, and the average quarterly price growth was 7%. SCLX experienced the highest price growth at 26%, while NSRX experienced the biggest fall at -11%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Pharmaceuticals: Major Industry was -18%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -26% and the average quarterly volume growth was -27%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 33
P/E Growth Rating: 59
Price Growth Rating: 42
SMR Rating: 52
Profit Risk Rating: 63
Seasonality Score: -5 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
MRK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a developer of human and animal health products

Industry PharmaceuticalsMajor

Profile
Details
Industry
Pharmaceuticals Major
Address
126 East Lincoln Avenue
Phone
+1 908 740-4000
Employees
72000
Web
https://www.merck.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Aon plc (AON) reported third-quarter 2025 revenue of $3.997 billion, representing a 7% year-over-year increase with equal organic growth. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $3.05, exceeding expectations. In late November, Moody’s reaffirmed Aon’s Baa2 credit rating and revised the outlook to positive, citing reduced leverage following the NFP acquisition.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) entered the spotlight after announcing advanced discussions with Yara International on December 8 to collaborate on low-emission ammonia projects. While the strategic direction aligns with global decarbonization trends, uncertainty around execution and capital requirements triggered a 9.45% one-day decline in the stock.
Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation are two of the most prominent names in the aerospace and defense industry, both positioned to benefit from heightened global security concerns and sustained U.S. military spending.
As 2025 winds down, the Savings Banks sector reflects a mix of stability, innovation, and AI-driven disruption. Among the most closely watched tickers—SOFI Technologies (SOFI), Ally Financial (ALLY), and PayPal Holdings (PYPL)—investors have witnessed contrasting stories of growth, valuation, and market perception.
Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is a wireless technology company focused on delivering secure, long-range communications for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and data networking applications. Its solutions are built to support mission-critical operations across sectors such as rail, energy, maritime, infrastructure, and industrial automation.
Ciena’s growth is driven by expanding offerings in optical networking, network automation software, and 5G transport infrastructure, complemented by services designed to help customers modernize and future-proof their networks. Its evolving technology portfolio addresses the rising complexity, speed, and reliability requirements of today’s communications environment.
Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) are two leading companies in the Bitcoin mining industry, each operating energy-intensive infrastructure to capitalize on cryptocurrency market cycles. This comparison is especially relevant amid ongoing Bitcoin price volatility and growing interest in digital assets and AI-related infrastructure.
Roivant Sciences has delivered strong year-to-date performance, with shares up roughly 82%, driven by encouraging pipeline developments and increased investment in high-potential subsidiaries such as Immunovant.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) are central to the United States’ push to establish a secure, domestic supply of rare earth elements—materials critical to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and defense technologies. As geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities intensify, these two companies offer distinct approaches to addressing U.S. dependence on foreign sources.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) remains one of the most closely followed ETFs worldwide, offering investors direct exposure to the NASDAQ-100 Index®. In the most recent data, QQQ has gained a notable +20.16% year-to-date, even as markets experienced bouts of elevated volatility.
Sidus Space has expanded its portfolio in 2025, focusing on satellite missions and supporting technologies to enhance space infrastructure. Key product advancements include the LizzieSat platforms, with multiple units progressing in design and manufacturing. LizzieSat-3 is set for launch no earlier than Q1 2025, building on prior missions to boost data capabilities for clients in Earth observation and communication.
As 2025 comes to a close, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) continues to strengthen its position in China’s competitive fresh grocery e-commerce market. Operating from Shanghai, the company focuses on high-quality fresh produce, ready-to-eat meals, and daily essentials delivered directly to consumers. Throughout the year, Dingdong emphasized private-label expansion, supply-chain optimization, and fulfillment network growth—initiatives that supported improving quarterly performance and positioned the company for sustained momentum.
Pioneer Power's 2025 highlights include the expansion of its mobile power and charging footprint with new orders and partnerships; the launch of a new suite of e-Boost solutions for off-grid EV charging; the rebranding of HomeBoost as PowerCore with events in December; the introduction of PRYMUS in December; and a new five-year contract for network transformers with a regional utility provider.
An AI-driven comparison between Palantir (PLTR) and Oracle (ORCL) points to Palantir as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights PLTR’s AI-native platforms, which enable real-time, data-driven decision-making across fast-growing sectors such as government, defense, and enterprise analytics.
An AI-driven comparison between D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and IonQ (IONQ) points to IonQ as the stronger opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights IONQ’s gate-based, trapped-ion quantum architecture, which supports a wide range of algorithms and positions the company for broader adoption across AI, simulation, and cryptography.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) points to Rigetti as the more compelling opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RGTI’s gate-based quantum architecture, which supports universal quantum computing and a wide range of complex algorithms. While D-Wave remains a leader in quantum annealing for optimization problems, Rigetti’s full-stack, gate-based approach offers greater scalability and broader long-term applications.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and TeraWulf (WULF) points to TeraWulf as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes WULF’s large-scale digital infrastructure supporting Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC), which generates immediate revenue in expanding digital asset and AI-driven markets.
An AI-driven comparison between Rocket Lab USA (RKLB) and Planet Labs (PL) identifies Rocket Lab as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RKLB’s vertically integrated space services and consistent launch performance, which position the company to benefit from rising demand for satellite deployment and space infrastructure.
An AI-driven comparison of Tempus AI (TEM) and Doximity (DOCS) points to Tempus AI as the more compelling investment opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights TEM’s AI-powered precision medicine platform, which applies advanced analytics and genomic data to transform diagnostics and treatment in oncology and cardiology.