VOE and VOO are two of Vanguard's most widely held index funds, yet they sit at opposite ends of the U.S. equity style spectrum. VOE isolates the mid-cap value segment, while VOO offers broad large-cap exposure to the entire S&P 500. They do not compete directly; rather, they represent complementary ways to pursue similar long-term equity goals through very different risk and sector profiles. Comparing them is especially relevant now, as investors weigh whether concentrated mega-cap technology leadership or cheaper, more diversified value holdings offer better relative positioning through the current market cycle.
VOE is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, a broadly diversified benchmark of value-oriented stocks of mid-size U.S. companies. The fund holds approximately 180 stocks, and its exposure is spread evenly — the top 10 holdings account for only about 13% of assets, limiting single-name concentration. Top positions in recent quarters include MPC (Marathon Petroleum), VLO (Valero Energy), PSX (Phillips 66), SLB (Schlumberger), CMI (Cummins), and GM (General Motors). Sector allocation leans toward financials (near 19%), industrials (about 14%), utilities (around 11%), and energy (about 11%), with technology in the single digits. The fund charges a 0.05% expense ratio and a trailing dividend yield near 1.9%. Its value mandate and sector mix give it a lower market beta — around 0.85 — than the broad market. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the holdings compare to peers.
VOO is a passively managed ETF that tracks the S&P 500 Index, a market-capitalization-weighted benchmark of roughly 500 of the largest publicly traded U.S. companies. With about 505 holdings, it offers broad diversification across all major sectors, but its cap-weighted design concentrates influence in the largest names: the top 10 holdings account for nearly 38% of the portfolio. Top positions include NVDA (Nvidia), AAPL (Apple), MSFT (Microsoft), AMZN (Amazon), GOOGL (Alphabet), AVGO (Broadcom), and META (Meta Platforms). Technology dominates at roughly 40% of assets, followed by financials, consumer discretionary, healthcare, and industrials. VOO charges a 0.03% expense ratio and carries a trailing dividend yield near 1.1%, with a market beta of approximately 1.0.
Both funds are shaped by a common macro backdrop: moderating inflation, shifting interest-rate expectations, and resilient corporate earnings. VOO's fortunes remain tightly linked to the artificial intelligence (AI) capital-expenditure cycle and the mega-cap technology names that dominate its top holdings, making it sensitive to semiconductor demand, cloud spending, and valuation sentiment. VOE, by contrast, is anchored in more economically cyclical and defensive sectors — energy, financials, industrials, and utilities — whose performance depends on credit conditions, energy prices, and infrastructure investment. This split means the two funds often move on different catalysts, with VOO riding growth momentum while VOE responds to value rotation, dividend demand, and shifts in the yield curve.
In recent market cycles, VOO has generally benefited from persistent leadership in large-cap technology and AI-linked mega-caps, which has supported strong relative fund performance and upward trend consistency. VOE has delivered steadier, lower-beta returns, with its value tilt providing relative resilience during risk-off episodes and periods of sector rotation toward energy, financials, and industrials. Volatility also differs: VOO's higher concentration in a handful of high-multiple growth names leaves it more exposed to earnings revisions and sentiment swings, while VOE's broad, equal-leaning value book tends to dampen drawdowns. Cost is not a meaningful differentiator — VOO's 0.03% fee is marginally lower than VOE's 0.05% — so relative positioning ultimately hinges on whether investors favor mega-cap growth momentum or diversified value exposure.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor VOO. Its case rests on superior cost efficiency, deep liquidity, robust trend consistency, and the durable earnings momentum of its mega-cap technology leaders, which have powered broad-market leadership across recent cycles. VOE offers compelling value, a more balanced sector footprint, and lower volatility, making it an attractive diversifier — but its cyclical and defensive tilt has generally lagged the growth-driven upside of the large-cap benchmark. In a probabilistic, momentum-aware framework, VOO's structural breadth and leadership characteristics give it the edge, while VOE remains better suited to investors prioritizing valuation and downside resilience over growth participation.
When comparing ETFs like these, I often rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter holdings by sector, volatility, and trend signals. It helps surface relevant data points in seconds and supports more informed allocation decisions without replacing core analysis.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The 10-day moving average for VOE crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 13 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
VOE moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +0.62% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VOE advanced for three days, in 274 of 335 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 263 of 333 cases where VOE Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 79%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for VOE moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 39 of the 46 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 85%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 41 of 65 cases where VOE's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on VOE as a result. In 63 of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for VOE turned negative on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 77%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VOE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category MidCapValue