Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Feb 19, 2021
What’s Better: Active or Passive Management?

What’s Better: Active or Passive Management?

Should you hire an active manager to oversee your assets? Or should you handle the investing yourself with ETFs and/or a ‘set-and-forget’ passive strategy?

The answer to this question is not definitive, and it really depends on what type of investor you are. It may also, interestingly, depend on when you’re trying to decide—more on that later.   

In this post, I’ll make the case for both approaches to investment management.

When You Should Favor Active Management

If you’re the type of investor who:

  • Wants alpha/outperformance;
  • Wants tactical management during downturns;
  • Tends to get emotional during volatile periods;
  • Wants a professional advisor you can talk to and work with…

Then active management is probably the right choice for you. But seeking out an active manager doesn’t mean you’ll always get those things—not all active managers are created equal.

A well-known academic study of a 20-year period from 1990 through 2009 looked at returns of active managers relative to their respective benchmarks, and found that net of fees the active managers underperformed by about 40 basis points per year. Interestingly, the study concluded that in periods when equity-market returns were 10% or higher, only about 30% of active managers outperformed their benchmarks.

So at this point, you may be thinking, why hire an active manager at all? Two reasons. First is that when the researchers looked closer, they found that truly active managers actually performed quite well. The most active 20% of managers, which the study called “diversified stock pickers,” outperformed their benchmarks by 126 basis points per year. The key takeaway here for investors is that active managers who actually trade regularly and have proven track records may be the ones to seek out.

 

 

The second reason is that active managers tend to thrive in tighter markets, when returns are subdued and there’s not much alpha out there to be had. In periods when market returns were under 10%, over 50% of active managers outperformed.

That’s why I mentioned earlier that it might matter when you’re asking about whether active is better than passive. In an environment when market returns looking forward are expected to be low – perhaps such as now given we’re nine years into the bull market and valuations are stretched – then active managers could deliver.

When You Should Favor Passive Management

If you’re the type of investor who:

  • Is truly focused on the long-term;
  • Has the patience to shrug off volatile swings and stay cool in difficult market environments;
  • Is fee sensitive;
  • Can keep your emotions in check;
  • Is ok performing in-line or slightly lower than the market…

Then passive investment is probably the right choice for you. With active management, there’s always a chance that the manager you hire will let you down, underperform the market, and mistime/mismanage a market downturn (or upturn). With passive management, your portfolio tracks the ups and downs of the market, and you participate in just about every price swing.

At its core, passive investment means purchasing an ETF that tracks an index, such as the S&P 500. For an investor who is truly passive, there is only one action item to take: purchase an ETF that tracks the index and never sell it. Over very long stretches of time (20+ years), the S&P 500 has proven to deliver attractive returns, the question is whether the passive investor can manage not to abandon the strategy in the heat of a bear market. That’s where “patience” and keeping emotions in check is critical.

Are You an Active or Passive Investor?

In reality, most investors are active investors. We have too much desire to outperform and are driven all too often by new investment ideas and attractive trades. It’s human nature. Perhaps the key is to be an active investor who also removes emotion completely from the equation, so you avoid unnecessary mistakes. You can do that by hiring an investment manager or using Artificial Intelligence (Robo-Advisors) to help you manage your portfolio over time. You can find both on tickeron.com.   

Related Ticker: SPY

SPY sees its Stochastic Oscillator ascending out of oversold territory

On June 12, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for SPY moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 41 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In of the 41 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SPY advanced for three days, in of 368 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

SPY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 436 cases where SPY Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for SPY moved out of overbought territory on June 03, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 45 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on June 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SPY as a result. In of 73 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for SPY turned negative on May 18, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 52 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SPY declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO), Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU).

Industry description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the S&P 500® Index. The trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by holding a portfolio of the common stocks that are included in the index (the “Portfolio”), with the weight of each stock in the Portfolio substantially corresponding to the weight of such stock in the index.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF ETF is 155.72B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 4.3B to 4.97T. NVDA holds the highest valuation in this group at 4.97T. The lowest valued company is MKTX at 4.3B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF ETF was 1%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was -0%, and the average quarterly price growth was 9%. KLAC experienced the highest price growth at 32%, while SMCI experienced the biggest fall at -27%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF ETF was -18%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was -9% and the average quarterly volume growth was -5%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 51
P/E Growth Rating: 51
Price Growth Rating: 41
SMR Rating: 50
Profit Risk Rating: 59
Seasonality Score: 24 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
SPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category LargeBlend

Profile
Details
Category
Large Blend
Address
PDR Services, 86 Trinity PlaceNew York
Phone
N/A
Web
www.spdrs.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Teradyne (TER), a leader in automated test equipment and industrial robotics, has demonstrated resilient performance amid a favorable semiconductor market cycle. In recent weeks, the stock has maintained upward traction, outperforming broader indices like the Nasdaq, supported by AI-driven demand for chip testing solutions.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has demonstrated resilience in recent trading sessions, navigating a period of moderate volatility within the aerospace and defense sector. The stock has shown upward momentum over the latest market cycle, supported by strong demand in commercial and military applications.
CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) has shown resilience in the cybersecurity sector amid broader market cycles, with shares experiencing moderate pullbacks in recent weeks following strong year-to-date gains. The stock trades near its upper range, reflecting investor optimism in AI-driven security innovations and platform adoption.
Arista Networks (ANET) has demonstrated resilience in recent trading sessions amid fluctuating tech market conditions. The stock has navigated broader sector headwinds, including competition in cloud networking and varying demand from hyperscale clients.
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY), a leading player in digital assets and blockchain investment, has shown resilience in recent trading sessions amid cryptocurrency market dynamics. The stock has navigated volatility driven by Bitcoin's price fluctuations, reflecting broader sector sentiment.
In the ever-shifting healthcare sector, CVS Health (CVS) and UnitedHealth Group (UNH) represent two powerhouse approaches: CVS as a retail pharmacy giant with integrated insurance and services, and UNH as a leading health insurer with diversified operations.
In the competitive retail landscape, American Eagle Outfitters (NYSE: AEO) is showing signs of robust upward potential as it navigates a strong 2025 performance.
In the dynamic world of satellite communications and broadband services, EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ: SATS) has captured investor attention with a notable technical breakthrough. On December 8, 2025, the stock's 10-day moving average crossed above its 50-day moving average, signaling the onset of a bullish upward trend.
In an era where global investors demand instant access to markets, major players in the financial world are racing to extend trading hours beyond the traditional 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. ET window. This push is driven by surging foreign holdings of U.S. equities, which hit $17 trillion last year, and the growing appetite for nonstop trading in a 24/7 digital economy.
In the resilient gold mining sector, IAMGOLD Corporation (NYSE: IAG) has demonstrated an extraordinary uptrend throughout 2025, capitalizing on rising gold prices and operational milestones.
Within the rapidly evolving automotive retail landscape, Carvana Co. (NYSE: CVNA) has emerged as one of 2025’s standout performers. Once viewed as a highly volatile name, the company has transformed into a market leader as demand for online vehicle purchasing accelerates
Microsoft (MSFT) emerges as the AI-favored stock in 2025, outperforming Apple (AAPL) with a 16% year-to-date gain, compared to Apple’s 10% rise. The advantage stems from Microsoft’s deeper enterprise AI integration, accelerating cloud growth, and scalable software ecosystem.
ExxonMobil (XOM) emerges as the AI-preferred energy stock in 2025, posting a 10% year-to-date gain compared with Chevron’s (CVX) 2% increase. Stronger upstream production, exposure to high-growth assets, and expanding low-carbon initiatives support XOM’s momentum. Tickeron’s AI models signal continued upside for XOM, while CVX shows signs of overbought conditions and elevated downside risk.
Tesla (TSLA) emerges as the AI-preferred EV stock in 2025, posting a 19% year-to-date gain, while BYD (BYDDY) has declined 82%, reflecting diverging momentum across the global EV market. Tickeron’s AI trading bots indicate strong bullish conditions for TSLA, supported by positive momentum signals, whereas BYDDY shows sustained bearish trends.
Broadcom (AVGO) emerges as the AI-preferred semiconductor stock in 2025, posting a 48% year-to-date gain, compared with 37% for NVIDIA (NVDA), supported by stronger diversification across networking, infrastructure, and custom AI chips.
- Bio-Techne carries a “Moderate Buy” consensus from 13 analysts, with an average price target of $70.58, implying about 15% upside. - Recent positive revisions include TD Cowen (Oct. 14, target raised from $65 to $70, Strong Buy), Evercore ISI (Oct. 7, $60 to $72, Buy), and RBC -
Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) has traded unevenly in recent weeks as investors digest shifting sector dynamics and company-specific guidance. The stock has moved into a consolidation phase following broader semiconductor rotations, with optimism in diversified end markets offset by ongoing pressure in mobile.
Seagate Technology (STX) has emerged as one of the standout performers of 2025, powered by explosive demand for data storage tied to artificial intelligence workloads. As hyperscalers expand cloud and AI infrastructure, Seagate’s high-capacity hard drives have become essential, pushing the stock sharply higher and keeping investor attention firmly locked on upcoming earnings.
Home Depot and Lowe’s are the two dominant players in the home improvement retail space, frequently compared due to their similar product offerings and overlapping customer bases of DIY homeowners and professional contractors. Their performance is closely watched as a barometer for consumer discretionary spending, housing market trends, and interest rate impacts.