Go to the list of all blogs
Harry Richardson's Avatar
published in Blogs
Oct 28, 2019
With Amazon and Netflix out of the way, fellow FAANG stocks set for earnings releases in the week ahead

With Amazon and Netflix out of the way, fellow FAANG stocks set for earnings releases in the week ahead

Amazon reported earnings on October 24 and the company came up short on the earnings estimate, but beat on the revenue side. The stock dropped sharply when it opened for trading the next day, but the stock rallied throughout the day and ended up only losing a little over 1%. Fellow FAANG member Netflix reported on October 16 and it beat its EPS estimate and its revenue estimate, but came up short on subscriber growth. Netflix jumped after its earnings report, but fell in the subsequent days.

With those two FAANG members out of the way, this coming week will bring earnings reports from Facebook (Nasdaq: FB), Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), and Alphabet (Nasdaq: GOOG). Alphabet is set to release results on October 28 and Apple and Facebook will both report on October 30.

Looking at these three stocks from a fundamental perspective based on Tickeron’s fundamental analysis tools, we get an idea of how these companies compare to other investment opportunities. I put together the following table to show what each company is expected to report compared to last year and where each company ranks in various categories.

The first thing that jumped out at me is the fact that Apple and Alphabet are expected to see earnings decline slightly from last year’s results. This reflects the economy we are in to some degree and it reflects the impact the trade war is having on tech companies. We see that Facebook is the only one with a valuation that is a little higher than average and that could be a concern.

All three companies rank above average in terms of the SMR (sales growth, profit margin, and return on equity) ratings. Apple and Alphabet are both better than average in terms of the Profit vs. Risk rating while Apple and Facebook are above average in the P/E Growth Ratings. The only rating out of all of them that is in the bottom 20th percentile is Alphabet’s P/E Growth rating.

Looking at different metrics from Investor’s Business Daily, we see pretty solid ratings for all three companies. Alphabet gets green marks across the board with the composite rating, the EPS rating, and the SMR rating all falling in the top 20th percentile and the Relative Price Strength rating is in the top 25th percentile.

Apple’s composite, Relative Price Strength, and SMR rating are all in the upper 20 percent of readings, but the EPS rating is in the average range. Facebook doesn’t have any ratings in the top 2oth percentile, but the composite, RS rating and SMR rating are all above average while the EPS rating is in the average range.

The sentiment indicators for the three show pretty bullish readings for the most part, but that is to be expected given how the stocks have performed. All three stocks have been in the top 25th percentile in terms of price performance for the past year, so bullish sentiment is to be expected.

The one area that stood out was the analysts’ ratings for Apple. There are 42 analysts covering the stock and only 22 have the stock rated as a “buy”. There are 15 “hold” ratings and five “sell” ratings. This puts the buy percentage at 52.4% and that is below average. The short interest ratios are all skewed to the bullish side and the analysts ratings for Facebook and Alphabet are both extremely optimistic.

Looking at the weekly charts for the three, Facebook just went through a pullback and its overbought/oversold indicators are considerably lower than the other two. Alphabet has been trending higher since June and its indicators are approaching overbought levels. Apple is in overbought territory based on its weekly stochastic readings and its 10-week RSI.

I did find the weekly chart for Apple particularly interesting.

We see that the stock was trending higher within a trend channel in 2017 and through most of 2018. The stock broke below the lower rail last fall but then rallied back. What used to be the lower rail of the former trend channel then acted as resistance in April of this year and it appears as though a new trend channel has formed. The stock has rallied sharply since May and the stock just moved above the former lower rail.

Related Ticker: AAPL

AAPL in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on June 25, 2026

AAPL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In of 27 cases where AAPL's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where AAPL's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on July 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on AAPL as a result. In of 66 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for AAPL just turned positive on July 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where AAPL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

AAPL moved above its 50-day moving average on July 01, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The 10-day moving average for AAPL crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on July 08, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AAPL advanced for three days, in of 354 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 282 cases where AAPL Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AAPL declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. AAPL’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: AAPL's P/B Ratio (43.290) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (5.328). P/E Ratio (37.941) is within average values for comparable stocks, (125.191). AAPL's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.532) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.500). Dividend Yield (0.003) settles around the average of (4.670) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (10.299) is also within normal values, averaging (3.023).

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), GoPro (NASDAQ:GPRO).

Industry description

Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Computer Peripherals Industry is 263.05B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 1.2K to 4.6T. AAPL holds the highest valuation in this group at 4.6T. The lowest valued company is DPSM at 1.2K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Computer Peripherals Industry was -6%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -30%. FEBO experienced the highest price growth at 11%, while GMEX experienced the biggest fall at -28%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Computer Peripherals Industry was -11%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -62% and the average quarterly volume growth was -28%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 46
P/E Growth Rating: 48
Price Growth Rating: 66
SMR Rating: 86
Profit Risk Rating: 94
Seasonality Score: -9 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
AAPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a manufacturer of mobile communication, media devices, personal computers, and portable digital music players

Industry ComputerPeripherals

Profile
Details
Industry
Telecommunications Equipment
Address
One Apple Park Way
Phone
+1 408 996-1010
Employees
166000
Web
https://www.apple.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Aon plc (AON) reported third-quarter 2025 revenue of $3.997 billion, representing a 7% year-over-year increase with equal organic growth. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $3.05, exceeding expectations. In late November, Moody’s reaffirmed Aon’s Baa2 credit rating and revised the outlook to positive, citing reduced leverage following the NFP acquisition.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) entered the spotlight after announcing advanced discussions with Yara International on December 8 to collaborate on low-emission ammonia projects. While the strategic direction aligns with global decarbonization trends, uncertainty around execution and capital requirements triggered a 9.45% one-day decline in the stock.
Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation are two of the most prominent names in the aerospace and defense industry, both positioned to benefit from heightened global security concerns and sustained U.S. military spending.
As 2025 winds down, the Savings Banks sector reflects a mix of stability, innovation, and AI-driven disruption. Among the most closely watched tickers—SOFI Technologies (SOFI), Ally Financial (ALLY), and PayPal Holdings (PYPL)—investors have witnessed contrasting stories of growth, valuation, and market perception.
Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is a wireless technology company focused on delivering secure, long-range communications for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and data networking applications. Its solutions are built to support mission-critical operations across sectors such as rail, energy, maritime, infrastructure, and industrial automation.
Ciena’s growth is driven by expanding offerings in optical networking, network automation software, and 5G transport infrastructure, complemented by services designed to help customers modernize and future-proof their networks. Its evolving technology portfolio addresses the rising complexity, speed, and reliability requirements of today’s communications environment.
Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) are two leading companies in the Bitcoin mining industry, each operating energy-intensive infrastructure to capitalize on cryptocurrency market cycles. This comparison is especially relevant amid ongoing Bitcoin price volatility and growing interest in digital assets and AI-related infrastructure.
Roivant Sciences has delivered strong year-to-date performance, with shares up roughly 82%, driven by encouraging pipeline developments and increased investment in high-potential subsidiaries such as Immunovant.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) are central to the United States’ push to establish a secure, domestic supply of rare earth elements—materials critical to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and defense technologies. As geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities intensify, these two companies offer distinct approaches to addressing U.S. dependence on foreign sources.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) remains one of the most closely followed ETFs worldwide, offering investors direct exposure to the NASDAQ-100 Index®. In the most recent data, QQQ has gained a notable +20.16% year-to-date, even as markets experienced bouts of elevated volatility.
Sidus Space has expanded its portfolio in 2025, focusing on satellite missions and supporting technologies to enhance space infrastructure. Key product advancements include the LizzieSat platforms, with multiple units progressing in design and manufacturing. LizzieSat-3 is set for launch no earlier than Q1 2025, building on prior missions to boost data capabilities for clients in Earth observation and communication.
As 2025 comes to a close, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) continues to strengthen its position in China’s competitive fresh grocery e-commerce market. Operating from Shanghai, the company focuses on high-quality fresh produce, ready-to-eat meals, and daily essentials delivered directly to consumers. Throughout the year, Dingdong emphasized private-label expansion, supply-chain optimization, and fulfillment network growth—initiatives that supported improving quarterly performance and positioned the company for sustained momentum.
Pioneer Power's 2025 highlights include the expansion of its mobile power and charging footprint with new orders and partnerships; the launch of a new suite of e-Boost solutions for off-grid EV charging; the rebranding of HomeBoost as PowerCore with events in December; the introduction of PRYMUS in December; and a new five-year contract for network transformers with a regional utility provider.
An AI-driven comparison between Palantir (PLTR) and Oracle (ORCL) points to Palantir as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights PLTR’s AI-native platforms, which enable real-time, data-driven decision-making across fast-growing sectors such as government, defense, and enterprise analytics.
An AI-driven comparison between D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and IonQ (IONQ) points to IonQ as the stronger opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights IONQ’s gate-based, trapped-ion quantum architecture, which supports a wide range of algorithms and positions the company for broader adoption across AI, simulation, and cryptography.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) points to Rigetti as the more compelling opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RGTI’s gate-based quantum architecture, which supports universal quantum computing and a wide range of complex algorithms. While D-Wave remains a leader in quantum annealing for optimization problems, Rigetti’s full-stack, gate-based approach offers greater scalability and broader long-term applications.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and TeraWulf (WULF) points to TeraWulf as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes WULF’s large-scale digital infrastructure supporting Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC), which generates immediate revenue in expanding digital asset and AI-driven markets.
An AI-driven comparison between Rocket Lab USA (RKLB) and Planet Labs (PL) identifies Rocket Lab as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RKLB’s vertically integrated space services and consistent launch performance, which position the company to benefit from rising demand for satellite deployment and space infrastructure.
An AI-driven comparison of Tempus AI (TEM) and Doximity (DOCS) points to Tempus AI as the more compelling investment opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights TEM’s AI-powered precision medicine platform, which applies advanced analytics and genomic data to transform diagnostics and treatment in oncology and cardiology.