It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMOAY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMOAY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while TMOAY (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
TMOAY is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
ADSK | TMOAY | ADSK / TMOAY | |
Capitalization | 55.7B | 1.13B | 4,920% |
EBITDA | 1.16B | 31.5M | 3,683% |
Gain YTD | 24.372 | -14.943 | -163% |
P/E Ratio | 61.92 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 5.21B | 573M | 910% |
Total Cash | 2.07B | 316M | 656% |
Total Debt | 2.67B | 50.2M | 5,309% |
ADSK | TMOAY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TMOAY's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ADSK (80) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMOAY’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMOAY (100) in the null industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMOAY’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's SMR Rating (16) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for TMOAY (93) in the null industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew significantly faster than TMOAY’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TMOAY (55) in the null industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to TMOAY’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMOAY (100) in the null industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMOAY’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK | TMOAY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago53% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago51% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago73% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago64% | 22 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago46% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADSK has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ADSK jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ADSK | 100% | -0.68% | ||
CLSK - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
COIN - ADSK | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
PTC - ADSK | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
RIOT - ADSK | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
CDNS - ADSK | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TMOAY and SWDAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMOAY and SWDAF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMOAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TMOAY | 100% | N/A | ||
SWDAF - TMOAY | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
JGHG - TMOAY | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
KNAMF - TMOAY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ADSK - TMOAY | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
SYZLF - TMOAY | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
More |