Advertisement
AEM vs GLDG
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) vs GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) Earnings Preview: Q1 Results on Horizon
Key Takeaways
- Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) scheduled to report Q1 2026 earnings on April 30, with analysts expecting EPS around $3.35-$3.40 and revenue near $4.2 billion.
- GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) released Q1 2026 interim results showing a net loss of C$7.25 million ($0.03 per share), driven by elevated exploration expenses.
- AEM's full-year 2025 production hit 3.45 million ounces of gold, achieving guidance with strong free cash flow of $4.14 billion TTM.
- GLDG maintains a solid balance sheet with $26 million in cash and focus on high-potential projects like La Mina and Whistler.
- Producer AEM offers scale and profitability (TTM EPS $8.86), while explorer GLDG provides leveraged upside to gold prices.
- Analysts favor AEM with average price target $254, versus GLDG's $3.24.
Earnings Context and Why This Comparison Matters
In the gold mining sector, earnings reports spotlight operational efficiency, production volumes, and cost management amid fluctuating gold prices. AEM, a leading gold producer, contrasts with GLDG, a mineral exploration firm advancing projects in the Americas. This comparison highlights the stability of established producers versus the growth potential of explorers, especially as gold benefits from economic uncertainty and inflation hedges. Investors weigh AEM's proven cash generation against GLDG's pipeline of assets like São Jorge and Titiribi.
Agnico Eagle Mines Focus
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) will release Q1 2026 results on April 30 after market close, followed by a conference call on May 1. Analysts project EPS of $3.35-$3.40 and revenue around $4.2 billion, building on robust Q4 2025 performance. In that quarter, payable gold production reached 840,608 ounces at total cash costs of $1,089 per ounce and all-in sustaining costs (AISC, a key metric including sustaining capital) of $1,517 per ounce. Full-year 2025 output hit 3.447 million ounces, meeting guidance, with record free cash flow supporting $1.4 billion in shareholder returns and a 12.5% dividend hike. Higher gold prices drove adjusted EPS to $2.70, beating estimates. Investors eye Q1 updates on 2026 guidance (3.3-3.5 million ounces) and projects like LaRonde expansions.
GoldMining Inc. Context
GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) filed unaudited Q1 2026 interim results on April 10 for the period ended February 28, reporting a net loss of C$7.25 million ($0.03 per share basic and diluted), wider than C$4.89 million prior year. The operating loss of C$7.29 million reflected higher exploration spending (C$1.58 million) and share-based compensation (C$1.86 million), aligning with its pre-production strategy. No revenue was recorded, consistent with its exploration focus. Balance sheet strength persists with C$26.1 million cash, C$55.5 million current assets, and total equity near C$242 million. Key assets include the 100%-owned La Mina (Colombia), Titiribi gold-copper (Colombia), São Jorge (Brazil), and Whistler gold-copper (Alaska). Recent Q4 2025 EPS was -$0.03, matching low expectations for a non-producer.
Head-to-Head Earnings and Market Comparison
AEM dominates in earnings strength, with TTM revenue $11.91 billion, net income $4.46 billion (profit margin 37.47%), and EPS $8.86, versus GLDG's TTM net loss $15.57 million and EPS -$0.05. AEM's scale yields ROE (return on equity) of 19.58% and levered free cash flow $4.14 billion, funding dividends (yield 0.82%) and growth. GLDG prioritizes exploration, holding $52.59 million cash with low debt, but lacks production revenue. Growth drivers favor AEM's 2026 output stability amid mine expansions, while GLDG eyes project advancement. Risks include gold price volatility for both, operational costs for AEM, and permitting delays for GLDG. Market cap reflects disparity: AEM $110 billion vs. GLDG $274 million. Sentiment leans toward AEM's execution track record.
AI Screener
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across sectors like gold mining. Try the AI Screener today to uncover potential opportunities in commodities.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron AI favors AEM with 70% probability over the next 12 months, citing superior earnings quality, production stability, free cash flow generation, and trend strength in a high gold price environment. GLDG offers speculative upside (30% probability) from project catalysts but trails in profitability and scale.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and GLDG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLDG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GLDG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLDG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GLDG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while GLDG (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -9.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
GLDG is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-9.15% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | GLDG | AEM / GLDG | |
| Capitalization | 83.4B | 198M | 42,121% |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | -27.48M | -35,462% |
| Gain YTD | -1.162 | -26.248 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.71 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 52.6M | 5,937% |
| Total Debt | 319M | 275K | 116,000% |
AEM | GLDG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GLDG's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (93). This means that GLDG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (100). This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (95). This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as GLDG (62). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.
GLDG's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (87). This means that GLDG’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | GLDG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
AEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.
GLDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLDG has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLDG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLDG | 100% | -3.27% | ||
| PAAS - GLDG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| KGC - GLDG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| AEM - GLDG | 71% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| EQX - GLDG | 70% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| CGAU - GLDG | 70% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||