AEM
Price
$145.27
Change
-$5.48 (-3.64%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
73.55B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAKO
Price
$7.10
Change
-$0.34 (-4.57%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
618.66M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs MAKO

AEM vs MAKO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. MAKO commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and MAKO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AEM: $145.27 vs. MAKO: $7.10)
Brand notoriety: AEM and MAKO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 103% vs. MAKO: 40%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $73.55B vs. MAKO: $618.66M
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $73.55B. MAKO’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $618.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $9.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAKO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAKO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAKO is a better buy in the long-term than AEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAKO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MAKO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AEM and MAKO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while MAKO (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -26.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($73.5B) has a higher market cap than MAKO($619M). MAKO (12.91) and AEM (12.44) have similar P/E ratio . MAKO YTD gains are higher at: 22.414 vs. AEM (-13.945). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5B vs. MAKO (87.6M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 3.48B vs. MAKO (94M). MAKO has less debt than AEM: MAKO (29.2M) vs AEM (320M). AEM has higher revenues than MAKO: AEM (14.5B) vs MAKO (185M).
AEMMAKOAEM / MAKO
Capitalization73.5B619M11,874%
EBITDA10.5B87.6M11,986%
Gain YTD-13.94522.414-62%
P/E Ratio12.4412.9196%
Revenue14.5B185M7,838%
Total Cash3.48B94M3,700%
Total Debt320M29.2M1,096%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs MAKO: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
MAKO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5615
SMR RATING
1..100
4328
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9143
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
21n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAKO's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (95). This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (56). This means that MAKO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (43). This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (62). This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (91). This means that MAKO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMMAKO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAKO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIFGX26.630.37
+1.41%
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps I
FMBRX20.130.13
+0.65%
Franklin Mutual Beacon R6
GMOWX25.710.13
+0.51%
GMO Resources VI
GLRBX25.110.09
+0.36%
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow R
TCIEX31.14-0.24
-0.76%
Nuveen International Eq Idx R6