Advertisement
AEM vs MAKO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and MAKO is a Hold.
AEM in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026
AEM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 30 of 37 cases where AEM's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The 50-day moving average for AEM moved above the 200-day moving average on October 06, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +7.07% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AEM advanced for three days, in 252 of 325 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 46 of 67 cases where AEM's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on AEM as a result. In 49 of 74 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for AEM turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 55 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 36 of the 55 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 65%.
AEM moved below its 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for AEM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 47%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AEM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The Aroon Indicator for AEM entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 65, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AEM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 100 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.317) is normal, around the industry mean (1.927). P/E Ratio (15.986) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-15.408). AEM's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (30.116) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.614). Dividend Yield (0.010) settles around the average of (0.345) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (6.766) is also within normal values, averaging (7.321).
MAKO's Indicator enters downward trend
The Aroon Indicator for MAKO entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 185 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 149 of the 185 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 81%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 25, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MAKO as a result. In 63 of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
MAKO moved below its 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for MAKO crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MAKO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for MAKO's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +5.03% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MAKO advanced for three days, in 223 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
MAKO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 65, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 28 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MAKO’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 58 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.693) is normal, around the industry mean (1.927). P/E Ratio (13.367) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-15.408). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.614). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.345) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.209) is also within normal values, averaging (7.321).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 77 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
AEM | MAKO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAKO's Valuation (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (100). This means that MAKO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
MAKO's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (41). This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
MAKO's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (43). This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
MAKO's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (45). This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
MAKO's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (84). This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | MAKO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MAKO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MAKO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAKO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- MAKO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.08% price change this week, while MAKO (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -20.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
MAKO is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-5.92% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
Advertisement
MAKO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAKO has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAKO jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAKO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAKO | 100% | -8.45% | ||
| AEM - MAKO | 80% Closely correlated | -5.98% | ||
| WPM - MAKO | 77% Closely correlated | -6.54% | ||
| IAG - MAKO | 77% Closely correlated | -7.86% | ||
| NEM - MAKO | 76% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| KGC - MAKO | 75% Closely correlated | -4.79% | ||
More | ||||