NEM($133B) has a higher market cap than MAKO($885M). MAKO has higher P/E ratio than NEM: MAKO (17.08) vs NEM (15.99). MAKO YTD gains are higher at: 73.793 vs. NEM (27.820). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16B vs. MAKO (95.4M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 9.01B vs. MAKO (112M). MAKO has less debt than NEM: MAKO (28.6M) vs NEM (5.6B). NEM has higher revenues than MAKO: NEM (25.8B) vs MAKO (209M).

	MAKO	NEM	MAKO / NEM
Capitalization	885M	133B	1%
EBITDA	95.4M	16B	1%
Gain YTD	73.793	27.820	265%
P/E Ratio	17.08	15.99	107%
Revenue	209M	25.8B	1%
Total Cash	112M	9.01B	1%
Total Debt	28.6M	5.6B	1%

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

MAKO vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings

	MAKO	NEM
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100	90	87
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100	65 Fair valued	78 Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100	6	29
SMR RATING 1..100	28	38
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100	37	12
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100	37	30
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100	50	33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAKO's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (78) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (29) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (38) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MAKO (37) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to MAKO’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MAKO (37) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to MAKO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

	MAKO	NEM
RSI ODDS (%)	2 days ago 65%	2 days ago 67%
Stochastic ODDS (%)	2 days ago 81%	2 days ago 72%
Momentum ODDS (%)	2 days ago 83%	2 days ago 59%
MACD ODDS (%)	2 days ago 80%	2 days ago 70%
TrendWeek ODDS (%)	2 days ago 73%	2 days ago 63%
TrendMonth ODDS (%)	2 days ago 81%	2 days ago 82%
Advances ODDS (%)	10 days ago 81%	10 days ago 78%
Declines ODDS (%)	5 days ago 72%	5 days ago 65%
BollingerBands ODDS (%)	N/A	N/A
Aroon ODDS (%)	2 days ago 82%	2 days ago 82%

COMPARISON

Comparison

Sep 12, 2026

Stock price -- (MAKO: $10.08 vs. NEM: $126.81)

Brand notoriety: MAKO: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable

Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAKO: 97% vs. NEM: 70%

Market capitalization -- MAKO: $885.21M vs. NEM: $132.91B

MAKO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $885.21M. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $132.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $575 to $134.78B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $13.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAKO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while NEM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

MAKO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
NEM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.

According to our system of comparison, MAKO is a better buy in the long-term than NEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAKO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

MAKO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
NEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the short-term than MAKO.

Price Growth

MAKO (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.23% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

View a ticker or compare two or three

MAKO

Daily Signal:

Gain/Loss:

NEM

Setup

Daily Signal:

Description

Gain/Loss:

VIEW DETAILS VIEW DETAILS

VIEW FOR FREE VIEW FOR FREE

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
AMPFX	44.21	0.26	+0.59%
American Funds AMCAP F-1
BEMIX	15.01	0.08	+0.54%
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
RYMNX	287.80	N/A	N/A
Rydex Precious Metals A
FRIFX	12.31	N/A	N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Income
GASFX	28.22	N/A	N/A
Hennessy Gas Utility Investor

MAKO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAKO has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAKO jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To MAKO	1D Price Change %
MAKO	100%	+2.65%
AEM - MAKO	75% Closely correlated	+1.87%
IAG - MAKO	73% Closely correlated	+0.85%
KGC - MAKO	73% Closely correlated	+0.69%
WPM - MAKO	72% Closely correlated	+2.08%
NEM - MAKO	72% Closely correlated	+0.53%
More

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To NEM	1D Price Change %
NEM	100%	+0.53%
KGC - NEM	88% Closely correlated	+0.69%
AEM - NEM	87% Closely correlated	+1.87%
WPM - NEM	87% Closely correlated	+2.08%
CGAU - NEM	86% Closely correlated	+0.13%
PAAS - NEM	85% Closely correlated	-0.61%
More