ALG
Price
$159.08
Change
+$1.24 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.94B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNH
Price
$10.25
Change
-$0.07 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
12.71B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALG vs CNH

ALG vs CNH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Alamo Group (ALG) vs. CNH Industrial (CNH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Scale Contrast: CNH is a global heavy-equipment giant with roughly $18 billion in annual revenue, while ALG is a specialized mid-cap manufacturer generating approximately $1.6 billion, creating fundamentally different risk-and-reward profiles.
  • Divergent Momentum: ALG's Industrial Equipment division has delivered sustained double-digit organic growth in recent quarters, whereas CNH continues to navigate a pronounced cyclical downturn in agricultural machinery demand.
  • Balance Sheet Strength: ALG ended its most recent fiscal year with cash exceeding debt by over $100 million, providing significant strategic flexibility; CNH carries a considerably larger enterprise value relative to its equity market capitalization.
  • Sector Headwinds: Both companies face tariff-related cost pressures, but CNH is more directly exposed to the agricultural commodity cycle and ongoing dealer inventory destocking, which management expects to persist through 2026.
  • Recovery Timing: CNH management anticipates an industry recovery beginning in 2027, while ALG's nearer-term catalysts include manufacturing consolidation benefits and accretive M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity.
  • Valuation Disconnect: ALG trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of approximately 19–20x, while CNH's trailing P/E has expanded above 35x, reflecting severely compressed earnings in the current cycle.

Introduction

Investors comparing ALG (Alamo Group Inc.) and CNH (CNH Industrial N.V.) are effectively weighing two different philosophies within the industrial equipment space. Alamo Group is a focused, mid-cap manufacturer of vegetation management and infrastructure maintenance equipment, while CNH Industrial ranks among the world's largest producers of agricultural and construction machinery, competing directly with peers such as Deere & Company. This comparison is relevant for investors seeking exposure to the capital goods sector — whether through a nimble, acquisition-driven specialist or a diversified global cyclical. Understanding how each company navigates the current environment of tariff uncertainty, divergent end-market demand, and shifting infrastructure spending priorities is essential for making an informed assessment.

ALG Overview and Recent Performance

ALG, headquartered in Seguin, Texas, designs, manufactures, and services high-quality equipment for vegetation management and infrastructure maintenance across 27 plants in North America, Europe, Australia, and Brazil. The company operates through two segments: the Industrial Equipment Division, which produces vacuum trucks, street sweepers, snow removal equipment, and excavators; and the Vegetation Management Division, which offers mowing equipment, agricultural implements, and forestry tools.

In recent market activity, ALG has presented a mixed but strategically evolving picture. The Industrial Equipment Division has been a standout performer, delivering organic revenue growth approaching 18% year-over-year in recent quarters, driven by strong demand from governmental agencies and specialty contractors — particularly for vacuum trucks and snow removal equipment. The division's backlog has remained above the half-billion-dollar mark, providing solid revenue visibility. Conversely, the Vegetation Management Division has faced persistent headwinds from weak agricultural and tree-care end markets, compounded by manufacturing facility consolidation costs. For the full fiscal year 2025, ALG reported net sales of $1.60 billion, down 1.5% from the prior year, with adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $216.9 million, representing a 13.5% margin. The company's balance sheet stands out: with approximately $310 million in cash against roughly $206 million in total debt, ALG enjoys net cash positioning that enables opportunistic acquisitions — most recently the purchase of Petersen Industries, a grapple-equipment manufacturer, which closed in January 2026. The company also raised its quarterly dividend by 13.3%, signaling management's confidence despite near-term volatility.

CNH Overview and Recent Performance

CNH (CNH Industrial N.V.), based in Basildon, United Kingdom, is a global equipment and services powerhouse operating through two core industrial segments — Agriculture and Construction — alongside a Financial Services arm. Its brands, including Case IH and New Holland, are recognized worldwide. With full-year 2025 consolidated revenues of approximately $18.10 billion and a market capitalization around $13.3 billion, CNH operates at a scale roughly eleven times that of Alamo Group.

CNH's recent performance has been shaped by a pronounced cyclical downturn in global agricultural equipment demand. Full-year 2025 revenues declined 9% year-over-year, with net sales of Industrial Activities down 10%. Net income fell sharply to $505 million from $1.26 billion in 2024, while adjusted diluted EPS (earnings per share) dropped to $0.55 from $1.05. The Agriculture segment bore the brunt of the weakness, with net sales down 12%, as farmers contended with low commodity prices, elevated input costs, and trade policy uncertainty. Construction segment sales declined a more modest 3%. On a positive note, CNH generated significant free cash flow of Industrial Activities — $513 million for the full year, a dramatic reversal from the prior year's negative figure — reflecting disciplined working capital management and reduced capital expenditures. Looking ahead, CNH management has guided for a further 5% decline in global industry retail demand during 2026, characterizing it as a trough year, with recovery expected to commence in 2027. Adjusted diluted EPS guidance for 2026 sits in the $0.35 to $0.45 range, underscoring the challenging near-term profit picture.

Trending AI Robots

In an increasingly data-driven investing landscape, traders are turning to artificial intelligence to help identify opportunities across thousands of publicly traded stocks. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to analyze market conditions, identify patterns, and execute trades across a broad universe of tickers. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots — each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, and performance profile — but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a spot in the Trending section. These bots cover a wide range of tickers and deploy diverse approaches, from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following models. Performance metrics and statistical track records are made available so that users can evaluate each bot's historical consistency, drawdown characteristics, and win-rate profiles. For traders and investors seeking a systematic, data-driven edge in comparing stocks like ALG and CNH, exploring the Trending AI Robots page offers a practical starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placing these two companies side by side, several structural contrasts emerge. Scale and diversification represent the most obvious difference: CNH's $18 billion revenue base and global dealer network provide breadth and brand recognition that ALG cannot match, but that scale also exposes CNH more directly to macroeconomic cycles, particularly in global agriculture. ALG's $1.6 billion revenue footprint allows it to be more agile and selective, with M&A — mergers and acquisitions — serving as a central growth lever.

End-market exposure creates a second key divergence. ALG's Industrial Equipment Division benefits from relatively stable governmental and municipal spending on infrastructure maintenance, while its Vegetation Management unit is cyclically exposed but represents a smaller portion of the overall business compared to CNH's dominant Agriculture segment. CNH, by contrast, is heavily tethered to the farm income cycle — currently at a multi-year trough — and to dealer inventory dynamics, which have been a persistent drag on shipments.

Profitability and returns favor ALG on most trailing metrics. ALG's return on assets (ROA) of approximately 7.6% and return on equity (ROE) near 10.8% significantly exceed CNH's comparable figures, reflecting ALG's leaner asset base and stronger operating margins in a normalized environment. However, CNH's free cash flow generation improved markedly in 2025, suggesting that management's cost discipline is gaining traction.

Valuation presents a nuanced picture. ALG trades at approximately 19–20x trailing earnings — a moderate premium that reflects its steadier margin profile. CNH's trailing P/E above 35x appears elevated, but this is largely a function of deeply compressed earnings at the cycle trough; on a forward basis, the multiple compresses considerably if the anticipated 2027 recovery materializes. Risk factors for both include tariff exposure (particularly on steel and aluminum inputs), though CNH also faces additional sensitivity to agricultural commodity prices and trade retaliation that directly affects farmer purchasing power.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative financial stability, and near-term catalyst visibility, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a probabilistic preference for ALG in the current market environment. The reasoning centers on several factors: ALG's Industrial Equipment Division continues to demonstrate reliable organic growth and maintains a robust backlog, while the Vegetation Management Division is showing sequential improvement and approaching the end of costly facility consolidation initiatives. The company's net cash balance sheet provides a margin of safety and supports value-accretive M&A. CNH, while possessing significant upside optionality tied to a cyclical recovery in 2027, currently faces another year of declining industry demand, compressed margins, and earnings that remain under pressure. AI models that prioritize trend consistency, lower earnings volatility, and balance sheet quality would more likely tilt toward ALG in a side-by-side evaluation — though a recovery-oriented strategy could certainly favor CNH once definitive signs of an agricultural cycle inflection emerge.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ALG vs. CNH commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALG is a Hold and CNH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ALG: $159.08 vs. CNH: $10.25)
Brand notoriety: ALG and CNH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALG: 69% vs. CNH: 129%
Market capitalization -- ALG: $1.94B vs. CNH: $12.71B
ALG [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $1.94B. CNH’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $12.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $375.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $27.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CNH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNH is a better buy in the long-term than ALG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALG is a better buy in the short-term than CNH.

Price Growth

ALG (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -3.79% price change this week, while CNH (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -8.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALG is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

CNH is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-3.97% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNH($12.7B) has a higher market cap than ALG($1.94B). CNH has higher P/E ratio than ALG: CNH (32.03) vs ALG (19.03). CNH YTD gains are higher at: 12.244 vs. ALG (-4.686). CNH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.6B vs. ALG (210M). ALG has less debt than CNH: ALG (290M) vs CNH (26.2B). CNH has higher revenues than ALG: CNH (18.1B) vs ALG (1.63B).
ALGCNHALG / CNH
Capitalization1.94B12.7B15%
EBITDA210M2.6B8%
Gain YTD-4.68612.244-38%
P/E Ratio19.0332.0359%
Revenue1.63B18.1B9%
Total CashN/A1.6B-
Total Debt290M26.2B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALG vs CNH: Fundamental Ratings
ALG
CNH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
268
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
7686
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7169
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNH's Valuation (20) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as ALG (24). This means that CNH’s stock grew similarly to ALG’s over the last 12 months.

ALG's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CNH (100). This means that ALG’s stock grew similarly to CNH’s over the last 12 months.

ALG's SMR Rating (76) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CNH (86). This means that ALG’s stock grew similarly to CNH’s over the last 12 months.

CNH's Price Growth Rating (69) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as ALG (71). This means that CNH’s stock grew similarly to ALG’s over the last 12 months.

CNH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALG (72). This means that CNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALGCNH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPSC73.397.56
+11.48%
SPS Commerce
CDT2.930.25
+9.33%
CDT Equity Inc
ZBRA293.825.25
+1.82%
Zebra Technologies Corp
MAIA1.25N/A
N/A
MAIA Biotechnology
VALN4.97-0.12
-2.36%
Valneva SE

CNH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNH has been closely correlated with AGCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNH jumps, then AGCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNH
1D Price
Change %
CNH100%
-0.68%
AGCO - CNH
76%
Closely correlated
-4.64%
DE - CNH
72%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
OSK - CNH
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
TEX - CNH
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
PCAR - CNH
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
More