AOS
Price
$56.61
Change
+$0.23 (+0.41%)
Updated
Oct 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.93B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ITW
Price
$265.16
Change
+$1.03 (+0.39%)
Updated
Oct 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
77.99B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AOS vs ITW

AOS vs ITW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 05, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? A. O. Smith (AOS) vs. Illinois Tool Works (ITW) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AOS is a pure-play water technology company, while ITW is a diversified multi-industrial manufacturer spanning seven segments.
  • AOS shares have pulled back roughly 7% over the past month and are down double digits year-to-date, reflecting China headwinds and revised guidance.
  • ITW has shown greater price stability, supported by best-in-class operating margins near 26% and a return on invested capital (ROIC) around 29%.
  • Both are dividend stalwarts, but ITW has raised its dividend for 62 consecutive years versus AOS at more than 30 consecutive years.
  • Relative positioning favors ITW on trend consistency and stability, while AOS offers a more discounted valuation and potential recovery catalysts.

Introduction

Investors comparing AOS (A. O. Smith Corporation) and ITW (Illinois Tool Works Inc.) are weighing two structurally different industrial franchises. One is a focused water heating, boiler, and water treatment manufacturer; the other is a diversified multi-industrial leader. This stock comparison matters for income-oriented and quality-focused investors seeking to understand relative performance, market positioning, and risk exposure between a company facing a specific geographic and technology challenge and one built for resilience across many end markets. Recent market activity has widened the divergence in momentum, making the comparison especially relevant for those evaluating where trend consistency and valuation currently stand.

AOS Overview and Recent Performance

A. O. Smith Corporation is a global leader in residential and commercial water heaters, boilers, and water treatment products, headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The company operates two main segments: North America and the Rest of World, with significant exposure to China and a growing presence in India. In recent weeks, AOS shares have lost momentum, with the stock down roughly 7% over the past month and approximately 15% to 16% year-to-date. This pullback reflects a combination of factors, including persistent weakness in its China business, which is in structural decline, and downward revisions to full-year earnings guidance. Management has narrowed its earnings-per-share (EPS) outlook for 2026, citing softer residential demand and continued China headwinds. Sentiment has also been shaped by the upcoming 2029 U.S. heat pump water heater mandate, which some investors view as a risk to the company's plumber-driven distribution model. On the positive side, the North American franchise remains strong, with emergency replacement demand providing stability, a growing dividend, and an active share-repurchase program.

ITW Overview and Recent Performance

Illinois Tool Works Inc. is a Fortune 300 diversified industrial manufacturer with roughly $16 billion in annual revenue, operating across seven segments including Automotive OEM (original equipment manufacturer), Test & Measurement and Electronics, Food Equipment, Welding, Construction Products, Specialty Products, and Polymers & Fluids. The company's performance has been more stable than AOS in recent market activity. For full-year 2025, ITW reported revenue up about 1% and GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) EPS of $10.49, with an operating margin near 26.3%. The company achieved a return on invested capital of roughly 29%, reflecting disciplined capital allocation. Shareholder returns remain a priority, with about $3.3 billion returned through dividends and buybacks in 2025 and a dividend raised for a 62nd consecutive year. Recent analyst sentiment has been mixed, with some firms citing valuation and softer end-market demand, though the company's diversified model and high margins have underpinned relative stability.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's most promising automated strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and set of covered securities. Because no single approach suits every market, only the bots best aligned with current conditions earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section, where users can review historical performance and other key metrics before committing capital. This filtering helps investors and traders quickly identify strategies that are performing well in the present environment. Explore the Trending AI Robots selection to see which automated approaches are currently standing out.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The core contrast between these two stocks lies in focus versus diversification. AOS is a concentrated water technology play with a dominant North American position but meaningful exposure to a declining China market and a regulatory-driven technology transition in heat pumps. ITW spreads risk across seven segments, which generally smooths cyclical swings but also limits the upside from any single growth driver. In terms of recent momentum, ITW has held up better, with modest single-digit moves over recent periods, while AOS has experienced a sharper drawdown. On profitability, ITW clearly leads, with operating margins near 26% versus a mid-teens to low-20s range for AOS. On valuation, however, AOS trades at a discount to its historical average, whereas ITW carries a richer multiple. Risk factors differ as well: AOS faces company-specific China and regulatory risks, while ITW is more exposed to broad industrial demand and potential margin pressure from input costs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, margin stability, diversification, and relative price behavior, Tickeron's AI would likely favor ITW over AOS in the current environment. ITW demonstrates more consistent technical stability, superior and more uniform profitability across its segments, and a diversified revenue base that reduces single-point risk. That said, AOS presents a potentially more attractive entry point from a valuation standpoint and carries identifiable catalysts, including a possible resolution of its China strategic review and progress toward higher-efficiency products. The assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive, and relative positioning could shift if AOS stabilizes its momentum or if industrial demand softens for ITW.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AOS vs. ITW commentary
Oct 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOS is a Hold and ITW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOS vs ITW: Fundamental Ratings
AOS
ITW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
3513
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6332
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AOS's Valuation (15) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for ITW (83) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AOS’s stock grew significantly faster than ITW’s over the last 12 months.

ITW's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AOS (100) in the Building Products industry. This means that ITW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AOS’s over the last 12 months.

ITW's SMR Rating (13) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AOS (35) in the Building Products industry. This means that ITW’s stock grew similarly to AOS’s over the last 12 months.

ITW's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AOS (60) in the Building Products industry. This means that ITW’s stock grew similarly to AOS’s over the last 12 months.

ITW's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AOS (63) in the Building Products industry. This means that ITW’s stock grew similarly to AOS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOSITW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 13, 2026
Stock price -- (AOS: $56.38 vs. ITW: $264.13)
Brand notoriety: AOS: Not notable vs. ITW: Notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOS: 162% vs. ITW: 112%
Market capitalization -- AOS: $7.93B vs. ITW: $77.99B
AOS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $7.93B. ITW’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $77.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $3.71K to $252.96B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $15.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while ITW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AOS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ITW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITW is a better buy in the long-term than AOS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AOS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AOS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ITW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ITW is a better buy in the short-term than AOS.

Price Growth

AOS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -0.65% price change this week, while ITW (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

AOS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

ITW is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+2.71% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AOS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ITW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSLE7.490.14
+1.97%
Satellos Bioscience Inc
ITRI85.581.35
+1.60%
Itron
TS57.340.75
+1.33%
Tenaris S A
SMBK50.02-0.04
-0.08%
SmartFinancial
UCL0.27-0.01
-3.09%
uCloudlink Group

ITW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITW has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ITW jumps, then IR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITW
1D Price
Change %
ITW100%
-0.22%
IR - ITW
74%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
AOS - ITW
72%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
ZWS - ITW
72%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
GGG - ITW
71%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
ROP - ITW
68%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More