APPF
Price
$146.56
Change
+$2.18 (+1.51%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.18B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUBS
Price
$173.40
Change
+$0.60 (+0.35%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.87B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APPF vs HUBS

APPF vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APPF vs. HUBS commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APPF is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (APPF: $144.26 vs. HUBS: $172.80)
Brand notoriety: APPF and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APPF: 112% vs. HUBS: 111%
Market capitalization -- APPF: $5.1B vs. HUBS: $8.85B
APPF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.1B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $8.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, APPF is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APPF is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

APPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.82% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

APPF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.58% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($8.87B) has a higher market cap than APPF($5.18B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than APPF: HUBS (90.95) vs APPF (34.35). APPF YTD gains are higher at: -37.993 vs. HUBS (-56.940). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 267M vs. APPF (194M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. APPF (152M). APPF has less debt than HUBS: APPF (37M) vs HUBS (247M). HUBS has higher revenues than APPF: HUBS (3.3B) vs APPF (995M).
APPFHUBSAPPF / HUBS
Capitalization5.18B8.87B58%
EBITDA194M267M73%
Gain YTD-37.993-56.94067%
P/E Ratio34.3590.9538%
Revenue995M3.3B30%
Total Cash152M1.69B9%
Total Debt37M247M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APPF vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
APPF
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5854
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
3186
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7689
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7197
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APPF's Valuation (70) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (78). This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (100). This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's SMR Rating (31) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (86). This means that APPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's Price Growth Rating (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (89). This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (97). This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APPFHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RITA20.840.27
+1.31%
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
CEE21.680.11
+0.51%
Central and Eastern Europe Fund (The)
CDC73.300.30
+0.41%
VictoryShares US EQ Inc Enh Vol Wtd ETF
FTNY7.940.01
+0.13%
Franklin New York Municipal Income ETF
USIG51.13-0.10
-0.20%
iShares Broad USD Invm Grd Corp Bd ETF

APPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APPF has been loosely correlated with WK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APPF jumps, then WK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APPF
1D Price
Change %
APPF100%
-4.78%
WK - APPF
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
BSY - APPF
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
ADSK - APPF
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
MANH - APPF
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
HUBS - APPF
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-1.83%
CRM - HUBS
79%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
TEAM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
ASAN - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
-2.46%
FRSH - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
NOW - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
More