BAC
Price
$51.29
Change
+$0.85 (+1.69%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
375.85B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
WFC
Price
$83.27
Change
-$0.73 (-0.87%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
262.24B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs WFC

Header iconBAC vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs WFCBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$51.29
Change+$0.85 (+1.69%)
Volume$316.36K
Capitalization375.85B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$83.27
Change-$0.73 (-0.87%)
Volume$117.96K
Capitalization262.24B
BAC vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. WFC commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $50.44 vs. WFC: $84.00)
Brand notoriety: BAC and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 140% vs. WFC: 156%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $375.85B vs. WFC: $262.24B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $375.85B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $262.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $810.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $132.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the long-term than BAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than BAC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +5.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.41% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($376B) has a higher market cap than WFC($262B). BAC (14.01) and WFC (13.72) have similar P/E ratio . WFC YTD gains are higher at: 21.550 vs. BAC (16.818). WFC has more cash in the bank: 35.3B vs. BAC (26.7B). WFC has less debt than BAC: WFC (210B) vs BAC (361B). BAC has higher revenues than WFC: BAC (105B) vs WFC (81.5B).
BACWFCBAC / WFC
Capitalization376B262B144%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.81821.55078%
P/E Ratio14.0113.72102%
Revenue105B81.5B129%
Total Cash26.7B35.3B76%
Total Debt361B210B172%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7818
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
339
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2018
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5942
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (76) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (81). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (33). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's SMR Rating (100) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (100). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (20). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (59). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLT91.340.68
+0.75%
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
THD59.750.38
+0.64%
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
LKOR43.980.18
+0.42%
FlexShares Crdt-Scrd US Lng Corp Bd ETF
PID21.26-0.03
-0.14%
Invesco International Div Achiev ETF
CGGE30.91-0.08
-0.26%
Capital Group Global Equity ETF

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
-3.52%
WFC - BAC
86%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
C - BAC
83%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
JPM - BAC
82%
Closely correlated
-2.34%
BK - BAC
72%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
-6.85%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
-2.85%
BAC - WFC
87%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
JPM - WFC
85%
Closely correlated
-2.34%
C - WFC
79%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
BK - WFC
70%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
-6.85%
More