BAC
Price
$53.65
Change
+$0.66 (+1.25%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
391.78B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$85.85
Change
+$0.29 (+0.34%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
269.49B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs WFC

Header iconBAC vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs WFCBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$53.65
Change+$0.66 (+1.25%)
Volume$18.92M
Capitalization391.78B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$85.85
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
Volume$6.55M
Capitalization269.49B
BAC vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
BAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. WFC commentary
Nov 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a StrongBuy and WFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $53.65 vs. WFC: $85.85)
Brand notoriety: BAC and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 56% vs. WFC: 45%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $391.78B vs. WFC: $269.49B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $391.78B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $269.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $852.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $140.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAC and WFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAC is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +4.05% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.81% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($392B) has a higher market cap than WFC($269B). BAC (14.66) and WFC (14.14) have similar P/E ratio . WFC (24.880) and BAC (24.252) have similar YTD gains . WFC has more cash in the bank: 34.8B vs. BAC (26.7B). WFC has less debt than BAC: WFC (214B) vs BAC (366B). BAC has higher revenues than WFC: BAC (107B) vs WFC (82.8B).
BACWFCBAC / WFC
Capitalization392B269B146%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.25224.88097%
P/E Ratio14.6614.14104%
Revenue107B82.8B129%
Total Cash26.7B34.8B77%
Total Debt366B214B171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
318
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (74) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (76). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (31). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (50). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (61). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEU72.970.26
+0.36%
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US ETF
XLSR62.760.16
+0.26%
State Street® US Sector Rotation ETF
LGCF33.86N/A
N/A
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF
XTRE50.01-0.03
-0.06%
BondBloxx Bloomberg ThreeYrTrgDurUSTrETF
EUO28.96-0.06
-0.19%
ProShares UltraShort Euro

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
+1.25%
WFC - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
C - BAC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
JPM - BAC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
BK - BAC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More