BAC
Price
$59.31
Change
+$1.01 (+1.73%)
Updated
Jul 9, 01:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
413.73B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$87.18
Change
+$1.62 (+1.89%)
Updated
Jul 9, 02:45 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
266.79B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs WFC

BAC vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bank of America (BAC) vs. Wells Fargo (WFC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BAC and WFC both trade near multi-month highs amid broad banking sector strength, with recent analyst price target increases ahead of Q2 2026 earnings.
  • Both banks passed the Federal Reserve’s 2026 stress tests and raised dividends, signaling capital strength measured by Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratios.
  • BAC shows stronger year-over-year total returns and higher Return on Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE) compared with WFC in recent quarters.
  • Net interest income (NII) remains a key earnings driver for both, though WFC continues to expand its consumer and commercial lending footprint post-regulatory relief.
  • Short-term price momentum favors stability at WFC, while BAC exhibits broader exposure to investment banking and wealth management fees.
  • Upcoming July 14, 2026 earnings releases for both will provide updated visibility on loan growth, credit quality via net charge-offs (NCOs), and asset under management (AUM) trends.

Introduction

Bank of America (BAC) and Wells Fargo (WFC) represent two of the largest U.S. banks by assets, offering investors exposure to consumer banking, commercial lending, wealth management, and capital markets activities. This comparison examines their relative performance, business positioning, and recent market dynamics for traders and long-term investors seeking to understand how these financial institutions have navigated the current interest-rate and regulatory environment. The analysis draws on observable price action, analyst revisions, and earnings expectations without offering forward-looking recommendations.

BAC Overview and Recent Performance

Bank of America operates a diversified model that includes retail banking, global wealth and investment management, and corporate and investment banking. In recent market activity, the stock reached a 52-week high near $60.83 before pulling back, closing at $58.30 on July 8, 2026. Year-to-date returns stand near 6%, with one-year total returns around 25%. Multiple analyst firms raised price targets in early July ahead of the July 14 earnings release, reflecting optimism around trading revenue and fee income. Sentiment has been supported by the company’s scale in equities and fixed-income trading, while broader sector rotation and macroeconomic data influenced intraday volatility.

WFC Overview and Recent Performance

Wells Fargo focuses primarily on consumer and small-business banking, commercial real estate, and wealth management, with a notable mortgage franchise. The stock also approached recent highs before a modest decline, closing at $85.56 on July 8, 2026. Year-to-date performance sits near 7%, while one-year returns are approximately 7%. Recent analyst activity included several upward price target revisions alongside the broader banking group. Performance has been influenced by ongoing balance-sheet optimization and loan growth following the earlier lifting of regulatory asset caps, with market participants monitoring credit metrics and deposit trends in the current environment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights the most suitable automated trading strategies for prevailing market conditions. The platform offers hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other instruments. Only those demonstrating consistent statistical performance, appropriate risk parameters, and alignment with current volatility and trend regimes earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, win rates, profit factors, and maximum drawdowns, allowing users to review detailed back-tested statistics before deployment. All strategies operate independently with distinct entry and exit rules. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for strategy details and performance metrics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Bank of America maintains broader exposure to investment banking and wealth-management fees, which can amplify revenue during periods of elevated market activity, while Wells Fargo retains a larger proportion of traditional consumer and commercial lending that benefits more directly from net interest margin expansion. Both entities carry significant sector exposure to U.S. economic growth and interest-rate movements. Recent momentum shows BAC with stronger trailing twelve-month returns, whereas WFC has exhibited comparatively steadier short-term price behavior. Risk factors differ in emphasis: BAC faces greater sensitivity to capital markets revenue variability, while WFC continues to manage legacy regulatory considerations and mortgage-related credit quality. Market sentiment, as reflected in analyst revisions, remains constructive for both ahead of earnings, with trade-offs centered on growth drivers versus balance-sheet stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, capital positioning measured by CET1, and relative momentum following recent analyst revisions, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probability of near-term outperformance to BAC over WFC. This assessment reflects BAC’s stronger historical ROTCE and broader revenue diversification rather than any definitive forecast.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BAC vs. WFC commentary
Jul 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Buy and WFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2026
Stock price -- (BAC: $58.30 vs. WFC: $85.56)
Brand notoriety: BAC and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 81% vs. WFC: 62%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $413.73B vs. WFC: $266.79B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $413.73B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $266.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $885.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $206.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAC is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than BAC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.10% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -0.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.33% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($414B) has a higher market cap than WFC($267B). BAC has higher P/E ratio than WFC: BAC (14.47) vs WFC (13.22). BAC YTD gains are higher at: 7.153 vs. WFC (-7.219). WFC has more cash in the bank: 33.5B vs. BAC (27.1B). WFC has less debt than BAC: WFC (216B) vs BAC (384B). BAC has higher revenues than WFC: BAC (115B) vs WFC (85B).
BACWFCBAC / WFC
Capitalization414B267B155%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.153-7.219-99%
P/E Ratio14.4713.22109%
Revenue115B85B135%
Total Cash27.1B33.5B81%
Total Debt384B216B178%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7467
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4722
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (63) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (68). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (47). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's SMR Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (4). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (51). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (61). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIUIX10.09N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes International Equity IS
FCPVX25.26N/A
N/A
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
KFFB4.82N/A
N/A
Kentucky First Federal Bancorp
FGIWX13.11N/A
N/A
Nuveen Global Infrastructure R6
DILRX20.88-0.18
-0.85%
DFA International Large Cap Growth