BAP
Price
$386.16
Change
+$3.15 (+0.82%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.67B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NU
Price
$13.59
Change
+$0.03 (+0.22%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
65.65B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP vs NU

BAP vs NU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. NU commentary
Sep 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Buy and NU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPNU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2026
Stock price -- (BAP: $386.16 vs. NU: $13.59)
Brand notoriety: BAP and NU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 69% vs. NU: 75%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $30.67B vs. NU: $65.65B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $30.67B. NU’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $65.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.31B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while NU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the long-term than NU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the short-term than NU.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.13% price change this week, while NU (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

NU is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.25% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCSA1.840.03
+1.66%
Processa Pharmaceuticals Inc.
TIPT17.150.17
+1.00%
Tiptree
LEN82.150.68
+0.83%
Lennar Corp
EXPO64.18-0.28
-0.43%
Exponent
BMEA1.32-0.17
-11.41%
Biomea Fusion

BAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been closely correlated with IFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then IFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAP
1D Price
Change %
BAP100%
+0.82%
IFS - BAP
76%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
BSAC - BAP
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
BCH - BAP
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
NU - BAP
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
CIB - BAP
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
More

NU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NU has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NU jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NU
1D Price
Change %
NU100%
+0.22%
INTR - NU
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
BBD - NU
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
BSAC - NU
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
ITUB - NU
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
BSBR - NU
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
More