BY
Price
$39.27
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRST
Price
$16.66
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
413.15M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs FRST

BY vs FRST Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Byline Bancorp (BY) vs. Primis Financial (FRST) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Byline Bancorp (BY) is a Chicago-based commercial bank with approximately $9.8 billion in assets, delivering record revenue of $446.3 million in full-year 2025 and strong profitability metrics including a net interest margin (NIM) of 4.35% in the fourth quarter.
  • Primis Financial (FRST) is a Virginia-based regional bank with roughly $4.0 billion in assets that completed a transformative sale-leaseback transaction in late 2025, boosting tangible book value (TBV) by 13.2% and recurring earnings by 15.0% on a proforma basis.
  • BY trades at a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 11.7 and has gained over 44% in the past year, while FRST trades at a P/E of roughly 7.1 with a one-year gain exceeding 50%, reflecting its recovery-driven trajectory.
  • Both banks operate in the regional banking sector, but BY demonstrates more consistent earnings execution, while FRST offers a restructuring-driven value proposition with historically lower capital ratios now improving.
  • Dividend investors may note FRST offers a higher yield at approximately 2.45%, compared to BY's yield of around 1.45%, though payout sustainability metrics differ meaningfully between the two.

Introduction

Regional banks occupy a critical segment of the U.S. financial landscape, serving as barometers for local economic health and commercial lending activity. This comparison examines two publicly traded regional bank holding companies — Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY) and Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) — that operate in distinct geographic markets with notably different scale, growth strategies, and financial profiles. For investors and traders evaluating regional banking exposure, understanding how these two institutions stack up across dimensions such as profitability, balance-sheet strength, recent momentum, and market sentiment can offer valuable context. Both stocks have generated significant shareholder returns over the past twelve months, yet the drivers behind those returns reveal fundamentally different narratives.

BY Overview and Recent Performance

Byline Bancorp, Inc. operates as the bank holding company for Byline Bank, a full-service commercial bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. The institution focuses on serving small and medium-sized businesses, commercial real estate sponsors, and consumers across the United States. With total assets approaching the $10 billion threshold — a regulatory milestone that brings additional oversight requirements — Byline has positioned itself as a growing force in the Chicago commercial banking market. The company's full-year 2025 results underscored this trajectory, with record revenues of $446.3 million, net income of $130.1 million (up 7.7% year-over-year), and diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $2.89.

Recent market activity has reflected sustained investor confidence in Byline's execution. The stock has climbed approximately 33% year-to-date and roughly 45% over the trailing twelve months, supported by a tangible book value per share that expanded 16.7% year-over-year to $23.44. Key profitability metrics remain robust: the net interest margin (NIM — the spread between interest earned on loans and paid on deposits) reached 4.35% in the fourth quarter, while the efficiency ratio — a measure of operating expenses relative to revenue — improved to 50.32%, well below the regional banking average. The company's Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1 — a core regulatory capital measure) ratio of 12.33% signals strong capital adequacy. Analysts maintain a consensus "Buy" rating with a twelve-month price target near $42.20, implying further upside from recent trading levels.

FRST Overview and Recent Performance

Primis Financial Corp. serves as the holding company for Primis Bank, operating twenty-four full-service branches across Virginia and Maryland. With approximately $4.0 billion in total assets, the bank provides a range of financial services to individuals and small- to medium-sized businesses, with specialized exposure to mortgage lending and investments in fintech-oriented ventures such as Panacea Financial Holdings. The company's 2025 represented a pivotal year of repositioning, marked by a landmark sale-leaseback transaction involving eighteen branch properties that generated approximately $58 million in proceeds and a pre-tax gain of $48 million.

The restructuring materially altered Primis's financial profile. On a proforma basis reflecting the full implementation of restructuring measures, tangible book value per share rose 13.2% to $13.25, while the consolidated CET1 ratio improved from 8.62% to 9.32%. Full-year 2025 net income reached $61 million, or $2.49 per diluted share — a significant turnaround from the net loss of $16 million reported in 2024. The fourth quarter alone delivered net income of $30 million, or $1.20 per diluted share, though this period benefited substantially from the one-time sale-leaseback gain. The stock has rallied sharply from its 52-week low of $9.55, recently trading near $15.80, reflecting a market that has responded favorably to management's restructuring execution. The company also authorized a share repurchase program of up to 750,000 shares and continues paying a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI-powered trading bots from a universe of hundreds of available automated strategies. These bots collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and sectors, employing diverse trading styles — from swing trading and trend following to mean reversion and breakout strategies — across timeframes ranging from five-minute intraday intervals to multi-day position holds. Performance statistics among the featured bots have included annualized returns exceeding 70% in certain categories, with win rates reaching above 65% and profit factors surpassing 2.5 in select strategies. Each robot operates with distinct risk parameters, stop-loss mechanisms, and ticker-specific focus areas, making the Trending AI Robots section a dynamic reflection of which algorithmic approaches are best suited to prevailing market conditions. Investors and traders interested in exploring how AI-driven models navigate the current environment can browse the full selection of trending strategies on the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most immediate contrast between BY and FRST lies in scale and market positioning. Byline Bancorp, at roughly $9.8 billion in assets and a market capitalization near $1.75 billion, is more than twice the size of Primis Financial ($4.0 billion in assets, approximately $393 million market cap). This scale advantage translates into operational efficiencies — Byline's efficiency ratio of 50.3% substantially outperforms Primis's proforma ratio of approximately 77%, meaning Byline spends far less to generate each dollar of revenue. Additionally, Byline's NIM of 4.35% exceeds Primis's proforma NIM of roughly 3.46%, reflecting a more profitable lending and deposit franchise.

On the growth and turnaround dimension, however, Primis presents a different calculus. The company's sale-leaseback transaction, securities portfolio restructuring, and subordinated debt paydown created a step-change improvement in its balance sheet that may not yet be fully reflected in its valuation — the stock trades at just 0.88 times book value and a trailing P/E of roughly 7.1, compared to Byline's P/E of approximately 11.7. Primis's dividend yield of roughly 2.45% is also notably higher than Byline's 1.45%, though this reflects different capital-return philosophies and sustainability profiles. Risk factors warrant careful consideration: Primis's capital ratios, while improving, remain lower than Byline's, and its recent earnings have been influenced by non-recurring items. Byline, by contrast, must navigate the regulatory transition that accompanies crossing the $10 billion asset threshold — a process that typically increases compliance costs. Both stocks carry low beta values (BY: 0.72, FRST: 0.71), indicating below-market volatility relative to broader equity indices.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, profitability durability, and capital strength, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely assign a higher relative confidence score to Byline Bancorp (BY) in the current environment. The stock's sustained upward trajectory, supported by thirteen consecutive quarters of pre-tax pre-provision return on average assets (ROAA) above 2.00%, a net interest margin that has expanded consistently, and a cleaner earnings profile with fewer one-time adjustments, creates a more statistically reliable trend pattern for algorithmic models to evaluate. Primis Financial's restructuring narrative is compelling and may offer greater upside potential for value-oriented investors, but the higher proportion of non-recurring gains in recent results and historically lower capital ratios introduce additional variables that AI models typically weigh as risk factors. Traders interested in how machine-learning systems interpret these dynamics in real time can explore the full range of AI trading bots on Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page, where strategies dynamically adapt to evolving market conditions across both tickers.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BY vs. FRST commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a StrongBuy and FRST is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (BY: $39.27 vs. FRST: $16.66)
Brand notoriety: BY and FRST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 49% vs. FRST: 70%
Market capitalization -- BY: $1.78B vs. FRST: $413.15M
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.78B. FRST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $413.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than FRST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRST is a better buy in the short-term than BY.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.13% price change this week, while FRST (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

FRST is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BY($1.78B) has a higher market cap than FRST($413M). BY has higher P/E ratio than FRST: BY (12.75) vs FRST (7.70). BY YTD gains are higher at: 36.200 vs. FRST (22.214). BY has more cash in the bank: 62.3M vs. FRST (8.36M). FRST has less debt than BY: FRST (375M) vs BY (580M). BY has higher revenues than FRST: BY (450M) vs FRST (128M).
BYFRSTBY / FRST
Capitalization1.78B413M432%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.20022.214163%
P/E Ratio12.757.70166%
Revenue450M128M352%
Total Cash62.3M8.36M745%
Total Debt580M375M155%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs FRST: Fundamental Ratings
BY
FRST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9133
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3068
SMR RATING
1..100
4359
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRST's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BY (68). This means that FRST’s stock grew somewhat faster than BY’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRST (68). This means that BY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.

BY's SMR Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRST (59). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRST (42). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

BY's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRST (100). This means that BY’s stock grew significantly faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYFRST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FYX146.110.31
+0.21%
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX® ETF
TFNS29.97-0.02
-0.06%
T. Rowe Price Financials ETF
VGI7.33-0.05
-0.68%
VIRTUS GLOBAL MULTI-SECTOR Income FUND
PBDC28.33-0.34
-1.19%
Putnam BDC Income ETF
SOLZ7.49-0.12
-1.52%
Solana ETF

BY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BY has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BY jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BY
1D Price
Change %
BY100%
+0.03%
FMBH - BY
87%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
IBCP - BY
86%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
UVSP - BY
86%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
SRCE - BY
85%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
GABC - BY
85%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
More

FRST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRST has been closely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRST jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRST
1D Price
Change %
FRST100%
-0.06%
HBNC - FRST
70%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
FISI - FRST
70%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
BY - FRST
68%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
COFS - FRST
68%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
PCB - FRST
67%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
More