FISI
Price
$41.75
Change
-$0.14 (-0.33%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
822.74M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRST
Price
$16.66
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
413.15M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FISI vs FRST

FISI vs FRST Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) vs. Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FISI and FRST are both U.S. regional bank holding companies, but they operate in distinct geographic markets — FISI in Upstate New York and the Mid-Atlantic, and FRST primarily in Virginia and Maryland.
  • FISI commands roughly double the market capitalization of FRST (approximately $767 million vs. $407 million) and generates proportionally higher revenue.
  • FISI delivered a standout full-year 2025 with record net interest income, robust margin expansion, and an efficiency ratio below 58%, while FRST has shown accelerating momentum in 2026 with net income nearly quadrupling year-over-year in its most recent quarter.
  • Both stocks trade at single-digit P/E (price-to-earnings) ratios — FISI near 10 and FRST near 7.5 — reflecting value-oriented pricing typical of the regional banking sector.
  • Dividend investors may note that FISI offers a higher dividend yield (approximately 3.2%) compared to FRST (approximately 2.5%), supported by FISI's larger earnings base.
  • FRST's more diversified business model, which includes mortgage warehouse lending, mortgage origination, and specialized healthcare professional banking (Panacea Financial), introduces additional growth levers but also adds complexity relative to FISI's more traditional community banking focus.

Introduction

Investors evaluating regional bank stocks frequently encounter FISI (Financial Institutions, Inc.) and FRST (Primis Financial Corp.) as two names that occupy a similar niche — small-to-mid-sized financial institutions with strong community banking roots. While both operate under the regional bank umbrella, their growth trajectories, geographic footprints, and business strategies differ in meaningful ways. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to community and regional banking, whether for income generation through dividends, value-oriented positioning, or capital appreciation tied to improving fundamentals. By examining recent performance, operational strengths, and market sentiment, this article provides a data-driven framework for understanding how these two stocks stack up against one another in the current market environment.

FISI Overview and Recent Performance

FISI, or Financial Institutions, Inc., is the parent company of Five Star Bank and Courier Capital, LLC. Headquartered in Warsaw, New York, the company provides a full suite of commercial banking, consumer banking, and wealth management services primarily across Western and Central New York, with additional commercial lending operations in the Mid-Atlantic region. As of year-end 2025, FISI reported total loans of approximately $4.66 billion and total deposits of $5.21 billion.

FISI's 2025 performance marked a decisive turnaround. After absorbing a significant investment securities restructuring loss in late 2024, the company posted full-year 2025 net income available to common shareholders of $73.4 million, or $3.61 per diluted share. Net interest income reached a record $200 million for the year, while net interest margin (NIM — a measure of lending profitability) expanded 67 basis points to 3.53%. The company's return on average assets (ROAA) reached 1.20% and return on average equity (ROAE) hit 12.38%, with an efficiency ratio below 58%. In December 2025, FISI completed a private placement of $80 million in subordinated notes, earning a BBB- rating from Kroll Bond Rating Agency, which revised the company's outlook to Stable. Management also activated a share repurchase program, buying back approximately 1.7% of outstanding shares in the final weeks of 2025, while simultaneously increasing the quarterly dividend by over 3% earlier that year. The ongoing wind-down of the company's Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) offering, initiated in late 2024, is expected to conclude in early 2026, removing a modest headwind from the deposit base.

FRST Overview and Recent Performance

FRST, or Primis Financial Corp., is a bank holding company based in McLean, Virginia, operating through its wholly owned subsidiary, Primis Bank. With 24 full-service branches across Virginia and Maryland, the company provides commercial and retail banking services to individuals and small-to-medium-sized businesses. As of early 2026, Primis reported total assets of approximately $4.3 billion, total loans held for investment of $3.4 billion, and total deposits of $3.4 billion.

FRST's recent quarters reflect a company rebuilding earnings momentum after navigating challenges tied to a legacy consumer loan program. In the second quarter of 2026, Primis reported net income of $9.43 million, nearly quadruple the $2.44 million recorded in the same quarter a year earlier. Net interest margin expanded to 3.45%, up from 2.86% year-over-year, while ROAA improved to 0.90% from 0.26%. Revenue for the quarter reached $55.79 million, comfortably exceeding analyst expectations. Tangible book value per share grew 19.5% year-over-year to $13.72, reflecting sustained profitability and capital accumulation. Primis benefits from a more diversified revenue mix than many peers: beyond traditional community banking, the company operates a mortgage warehouse lending division, a mortgage origination unit (Primis Mortgage), and a specialized healthcare professional banking segment through its Panacea Financial division. Analysts have taken note of FRST's improving trajectory, with consensus ratings skewed toward Buy and price targets in the $17–$19 range as of mid-2026.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking data-driven insights beyond traditional fundamental and technical analysis, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate evolving market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in this featured section. The bots employ diverse trading styles — from swing trading and trend following to mean reversion and breakout strategies — each with its own statistical track record, risk profile, and set of traded tickers. Performance metrics such as annualized returns, trade accuracy, and maximum drawdown help investors evaluate which bots may be suitable for their objectives. For those interested in augmenting their trading process with algorithmic intelligence, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can be a practical next step.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, FISI and FRST reveal meaningful contrasts across several dimensions. Scale and revenue: FISI generates roughly double the revenue ($249 million vs. $128 million) and carries a market capitalization approximately 88% larger, giving it a broader capital base and greater capacity for shareholder returns such as dividends and buybacks. Geographic footprint: FISI is anchored in Upstate New York with a growing Mid-Atlantic presence, while FRST concentrates on Virginia and Maryland — two demographically distinct regions with differing economic drivers and competitive dynamics.

Business model complexity: FISI operates a more streamlined structure — commercial banking, consumer banking, and wealth management — whereas FRST layers on mortgage warehouse lending, mortgage origination, and Panacea's healthcare banking, creating multiple growth vectors but also increasing operational complexity. Earnings trajectory: FISI's 2025 was one of recovery and record-setting profitability following a restructuring-driven loss in late 2024, while FRST's 2026 is shaping up as a breakout year after cleaning up legacy consumer loan exposure. Valuation: Both stocks trade at low single-digit P/E ratios, but FRST's multiple (around 7.5) sits below FISI's (around 10), potentially reflecting the market's differing assessment of their earnings quality and growth sustainability. Dividend profile: FISI offers a notably higher dividend yield, supported by a payout ratio near 31% in recent quarters, while FRST maintains a conservative $0.10 quarterly dividend with a lower payout ratio, leaving more room for reinvestment. Risk factors: FISI faces transitional risk from the BaaS wind-down and concentration in Upstate New York's economy; FRST's risks include execution challenges tied to its multi-segment expansion and the residual runoff of non-core loan portfolios.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning within the regional bank sector, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely express a nuanced preference between these two stocks. FISI's established profitability, strong capital ratios, record net interest income, and shareholder-friendly capital return policies — including consistent dividend growth and active share repurchases — suggest a more mature, steady-state compounder. FRST, by contrast, presents a turnaround and acceleration narrative, with sharply improving net interest margin, expanding ROAA, and a diversified revenue base that could drive above-peer growth if execution remains on track. The AI would likely favor FISI for stability-oriented and income-seeking positioning, while recognizing FRST's stronger near-term earnings momentum and potential for multiple expansion as its profitability metrics converge toward peer norms. Neither stock is without risk, and the comparative appeal ultimately depends on whether an investor prioritizes proven consistency or recovery-driven upside.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FISI vs. FRST commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISI is a Hold and FRST is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (FISI: $41.75 vs. FRST: $16.66)
Brand notoriety: FISI and FRST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FISI: 37% vs. FRST: 70%
Market capitalization -- FISI: $822.74M vs. FRST: $413.15M
FISI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $822.74M. FRST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $413.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FISI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FISI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FISI is a better buy in the long-term than FRST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FISI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FISI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRST is a better buy in the short-term than FISI.

Price Growth

FISI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while FRST (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FISI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

FRST is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FISI($823M) has a higher market cap than FRST($413M). FISI has higher P/E ratio than FRST: FISI (10.36) vs FRST (7.70). FISI YTD gains are higher at: 36.522 vs. FRST (22.214). FISI has more cash in the bank: 56.3M vs. FRST (8.36M). FISI has less debt than FRST: FISI (225M) vs FRST (375M). FISI has higher revenues than FRST: FISI (249M) vs FRST (128M).
FISIFRSTFISI / FRST
Capitalization823M413M199%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.52222.214164%
P/E Ratio10.367.70135%
Revenue249M128M195%
Total Cash56.3M8.36M673%
Total Debt225M375M60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FISI vs FRST: Fundamental Ratings
FISI
FRST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8633
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3868
SMR RATING
1..100
4859
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRST's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FISI (27). This means that FRST’s stock grew similarly to FISI’s over the last 12 months.

FISI's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRST (68). This means that FISI’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FISI's SMR Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRST (59). This means that FISI’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FISI's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRST (42). This means that FISI’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FISI's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRST (100). This means that FISI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FISIFRST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FISI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNMVX34.770.11
+0.32%
Harbor Mid Cap Value Retirement
VSIAX108.150.28
+0.26%
Vanguard MStar Small Cap Value Indx Adm
WSMRX32.650.04
+0.12%
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth R6
TCBIX9.86N/A
N/A
Covered Bridge I
FDTOX41.81-0.08
-0.19%
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock A

FISI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FISI has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FISI jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FISI
1D Price
Change %
FISI100%
-0.33%
BY - FISI
85%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
UBSI - FISI
82%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
UVSP - FISI
82%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
SRCE - FISI
82%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
CCNE - FISI
82%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
More

FRST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRST has been closely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRST jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRST
1D Price
Change %
FRST100%
-0.06%
HBNC - FRST
70%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
FISI - FRST
70%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
BY - FRST
68%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
COFS - FRST
68%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
PCB - FRST
67%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
More