COFS
Price
$33.93
Change
+$1.05 (+3.19%)
Updated
Jul 2, 12:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
515.44M
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRST
Price
$16.18
Change
-$0.47 (-2.82%)
Updated
Jul 2, 12:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
407.26M
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COFS vs FRST

COFS vs FRST Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COFS vs. FRST commentary
Jul 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a Hold and FRST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 02, 2026
Stock price -- (COFS: $32.88 vs. FRST: $16.65)
Brand notoriety: COFS and FRST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 389% vs. FRST: 513%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $515.44M vs. FRST: $407.26M
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $515.44M. FRST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $407.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the long-term than FRST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FRST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the short-term than FRST.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while FRST (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

FRST is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COFS($515M) has a higher market cap than FRST($407M). FRST has higher P/E ratio than COFS: FRST (8.28) vs COFS (7.60). FRST YTD gains are higher at: 21.391 vs. COFS (13.571). COFS has more cash in the bank: 83.9M vs. FRST (9.69M). COFS has less debt than FRST: COFS (234M) vs FRST (375M). COFS has higher revenues than FRST: COFS (173M) vs FRST (128M).
COFSFRSTCOFS / FRST
Capitalization515M407M127%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.57121.39163%
P/E Ratio7.608.2892%
Revenue173M128M135%
Total Cash83.9M9.69M866%
Total Debt234M375M62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs FRST: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
FRST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4048
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4770
SMR RATING
1..100
5358
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9799
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COFS's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as FRST (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FRST (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FRST (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FRST's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (46) in the null industry. This means that FRST’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as FRST (99) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSFRST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JACAX46.66N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Instl
HSFNX31.79N/A
N/A
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Investor
FSTSX18.91N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series International Sm Cap
PCCOX74.82N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research I
JABIX14.02N/A
N/A
JHancock Real Estate Securities R6

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been closely correlated with FISI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then FISI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
N/A
FISI - COFS
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
BY - COFS
78%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
BFST - COFS
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
IBCP - COFS
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
PCB - COFS
75%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

FRST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRST has been closely correlated with FISI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRST jumps, then FISI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRST
1D Price
Change %
FRST100%
N/A
FISI - FRST
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
HBNC - FRST
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
BY - FRST
68%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
COFS - FRST
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
PCB - FRST
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
More