CCC
Price
$7.12
Change
+$0.15 (+2.15%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.2B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUBS
Price
$240.51
Change
+$30.39 (+14.46%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.99B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCC vs HUBS

CCC vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCC vs. HUBS commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCC is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CCC: $7.12 vs. HUBS: $240.51)
Brand notoriety: CCC and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCC: 59% vs. HUBS: 178%
Market capitalization -- CCC: $4.2B vs. HUBS: $11.99B
CCC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.2B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $234.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCC is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCC is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

CCC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +9.54% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +18.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.86% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($12B) has a higher market cap than CCC($4.2B). CCC has higher P/E ratio than HUBS: CCC (101.79) vs HUBS (85.59). CCC YTD gains are higher at: -10.440 vs. HUBS (-40.067). CCC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 338M vs. HUBS (267M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. CCC (116M). HUBS has less debt than CCC: HUBS (247M) vs CCC (1.36B). HUBS has higher revenues than CCC: HUBS (3.3B) vs CCC (1.11B).
CCCHUBSCCC / HUBS
Capitalization4.2B12B35%
EBITDA338M267M127%
Gain YTD-10.440-40.06726%
P/E Ratio101.7985.59119%
Revenue1.11B3.3B34%
Total Cash116M1.69B7%
Total Debt1.36B247M549%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCC vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
CCC
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4218
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3962
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3298
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCC's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (78) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CCC’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CCC’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CCC (90) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to CCC’s over the last 12 months.

CCC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CCC’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CCC's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CCC’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCCHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGCL1.600.18
+12.68%
Lucas GC Limited
WSO311.602.19
+0.71%
Watsco
DBD72.240.46
+0.64%
Diebold Nixdorf
CHSCN25.180.09
+0.36%
CHS
BUUU28.02-2.32
-7.65%
BUUU Group Ltd.

CCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCC has been loosely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCC jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCC
1D Price
Change %
CCC100%
+2.15%
WDAY - CCC
54%
Loosely correlated
+17.78%
GWRE - CCC
53%
Loosely correlated
+5.51%
INTA - CCC
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.77%
FRSH - CCC
50%
Loosely correlated
+8.89%
HUBS - CCC
50%
Loosely correlated
+14.46%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+14.46%
CRM - HUBS
79%
Closely correlated
+4.16%
TEAM - HUBS
73%
Closely correlated
+6.92%
ASAN - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
+9.79%
DOCU - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
+10.31%
BRZE - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
+7.91%
More