CCC
Price
$4.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.93B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUBS
Price
$222.37
Change
-$17.79 (-7.41%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.29B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCC vs HUBS

Header iconCCC vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts CCC vs HUBSBanner chart's image
CCC vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCC vs. HUBS commentary
Jun 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCC is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CCC: $4.99 vs. HUBS: $240.16)
Brand notoriety: CCC and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCC: 82% vs. HUBS: 138%
Market capitalization -- CCC: $2.93B vs. HUBS: $12.29B
CCC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.93B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $12.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $228.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CCC and HUBS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CCC and HUBS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CCC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +8.12% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +21.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.92% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($12.3B) has a higher market cap than CCC($2.93B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than CCC: HUBS (126.40) vs CCC (83.25). CCC YTD gains are higher at: -37.170 vs. HUBS (-40.154). CCC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 310M vs. HUBS (267M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. CCC (36.9M). HUBS has less debt than CCC: HUBS (247M) vs CCC (1.36B). HUBS has higher revenues than CCC: HUBS (3.3B) vs CCC (1.09B).
CCCHUBSCCC / HUBS
Capitalization2.93B12.3B24%
EBITDA310M267M116%
Gain YTD-37.170-40.15493%
P/E Ratio83.25126.4066%
Revenue1.09B3.3B33%
Total Cash36.9M1.69B2%
Total Debt1.36B247M551%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCCHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALMU26.680.47
+1.79%
AELUMA INC
TFII158.652.35
+1.50%
TFI International
GGR4.010.03
+0.75%
Gogoro Inc.
OSW23.830.03
+0.15%
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited
JZXN1.31-0.03
-2.24%
Jiuzi Holdings Inc.

CCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCC has been loosely correlated with BL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCC jumps, then BL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCC
1D Price
Change %
CCC100%
-2.82%
BL - CCC
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
WDAY - CCC
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.31%
GWRE - CCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-5.06%
HUBS - CCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-8.41%
FRSH - CCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.73%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-8.41%
CRM - HUBS
78%
Closely correlated
-4.18%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
-5.91%
FRSH - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
-4.73%
NOW - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-6.04%
S - HUBS
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
More