Advertisement
CFFN vs PFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFN is a Hold and PFS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFFN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CFFN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CFFN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CFFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CFFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
CFFN is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CFFN | PFS | CFFN / PFS | |
| Capitalization | 1.06B | 3.06B | 34% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.241 | 21.620 | 131% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.15 | 10.00 | 141% |
| Revenue | 217M | 887M | 24% |
| Total Cash | 22.4M | 211M | 11% |
| Total Debt | 1.71B | 2.8B | 61% |
CFFN | PFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFS's Valuation (17) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (38). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (100). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's SMR Rating (31) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (63). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.
CFFN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (46). This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.
CFFN's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (89). This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.
| CFFN | PFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 35% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GCOW | 44.25 | 0.16 | +0.36% |
| Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | |||
| DTEC | 48.73 | 0.04 | +0.09% |
| ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | |||
| FMUB | 51.32 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Municipal Bond Opports ETF | |||
| DNOV | 51.50 | -0.12 | -0.23% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Nov | |||
| SEPU | 31.13 | -0.22 | -0.70% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncSepETF | |||
CFFN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFN has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFN jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFFN | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| TRMK - CFFN | 83% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| FCF - CFFN | 83% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| EFSC - CFFN | 82% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| PFS - CFFN | 82% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| MBWM - CFFN | 82% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||
PFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| TRMK - PFS | 87% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| UBSI - PFS | 86% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| AUB - PFS | 84% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| RNST - PFS | 84% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| UCB - PFS | 84% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||