| CHAT | IQM | CHAT / IQM | |
| Gain YTD | 39.010 | 17.243 | 226% |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 103M | 1,724% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.50 | 150% |
| Turnover | 92.00 | 33.00 | 279% |
| Yield | 2.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 6 years | - |
| CHAT | IQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DADS | 19.55 | -0.13 | -0.66% |
| Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | |||
| FLAU | 34.97 | -0.57 | -1.59% |
| Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | |||
| DIPS | 38.21 | -0.99 | -2.53% |
| YieldMax Short NVDA Option Inc Strgy ETF | |||
| AMDL | 51.73 | -1.79 | -3.34% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | |||
| AAPB | 37.84 | -6.72 | -15.09% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then MU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAT | 100% | +2.22% | ||
| MU - CHAT | 75% Closely correlated | -5.90% | ||
| COHR - CHAT | 68% Closely correlated | +5.55% | ||
| MRVL - CHAT | 67% Closely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| NVDA - CHAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| ANET - CHAT | 59% Loosely correlated | +5.46% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IQM has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IQM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| LRCX - IQM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| TER - IQM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| ETN - IQM | 51% Loosely correlated | +7.32% | ||
| TSM - IQM | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| MRVL - IQM | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.32% | ||
More | ||||