It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHRW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHRW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHRW (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while HUBG (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -4.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.58%.
CHRW is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
HUBG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
CHRW | HUBG | CHRW / HUBG | |
Capitalization | 8.91B | 2.63B | 339% |
EBITDA | 614M | 407M | 151% |
Gain YTD | 29.501 | 5.709 | 517% |
P/E Ratio | 26.96 | 15.96 | 169% |
Revenue | 17.6B | 4.2B | 419% |
Total Cash | 146M | 187M | 78% |
Total Debt | 1.95B | 576M | 339% |
CHRW | HUBG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHRW's Valuation (66) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as HUBG (89). This means that CHRW’s stock grew similarly to HUBG’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as CHRW (35). This means that HUBG’s stock grew similarly to CHRW’s over the last 12 months.
CHRW's SMR Rating (41) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBG (79). This means that CHRW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBG’s over the last 12 months.
CHRW's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as HUBG (49). This means that CHRW’s stock grew similarly to HUBG’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as CHRW (19). This means that HUBG’s stock grew similarly to CHRW’s over the last 12 months.
CHRW | HUBG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago65% | 9 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 6 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago61% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NABEX | 12.43 | N/A | N/A |
Neuberger Berman Abs Ret Multi-Mgr E | |||
RSLAX | 58.99 | -0.49 | -0.82% |
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1 | |||
SMDRX | 20.08 | -0.22 | -1.08% |
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps SDR | |||
HSLVX | 51.61 | -0.59 | -1.13% |
Hartford Small Cap Growth R6 | |||
NDVRX | 17.16 | -0.23 | -1.32% |
MFS New Discovery Value R1 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHRW has been loosely correlated with EXPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHRW jumps, then EXPD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHRW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CHRW | 100% | -1.12% | ||
EXPD - CHRW | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
XPO - CHRW | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
HUBG - CHRW | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
PBI - CHRW | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
LSTR - CHRW | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBG has been closely correlated with XPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBG jumps, then XPO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HUBG | 100% | -2.63% | ||
XPO - HUBG | 70% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
LSTR - HUBG | 69% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
JBHT - HUBG | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
RLGT - HUBG | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
CHRW - HUBG | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
More |