Advertisement
CL vs MDLZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.93%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-2.41% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.10% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| CL | MDLZ | CL / MDLZ | |
| Capitalization | 71.1B | 78.3B | 91% |
| EBITDA | 3.9B | 5.23B | 75% |
| Gain YTD | 13.819 | 14.245 | 97% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.43 | 30.18 | 114% |
| Revenue | 20.8B | 39.3B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 1.34B | 1.52B | 88% |
| Total Debt | 7.97B | 21.6B | 37% |
CL | MDLZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDLZ's Valuation (30) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (69) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CL (52) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | MDLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 16 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 28% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AGIX | 44.46 | 0.68 | +1.55% |
| KraneShares Artfcl Intllgnc and Tech ETF | |||
| ONEQ | 104.89 | 1.06 | +1.02% |
| Fidelity Nasdaq Composite ETF | |||
| XSEP | 44.00 | 0.06 | +0.15% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Sep | |||
| STAX | 25.40 | N/A | N/A |
| Nomura Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF | |||
| IXP | 124.27 | -0.80 | -0.64% |
| iShares Global Comm Services ETF | |||
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.