Advertisement
CL vs UL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Colgate-Palmolive (CL) has delivered stronger year-to-date performance compared to Unilever (UL), with CL returning approximately 16.9% versus UL’s 5.2% amid broader market conditions.
- Both companies operate in the consumer staples sector, focusing on personal care and household products, though Unilever (UL) maintains a more diversified portfolio that includes foods and beverages.
- Colgate-Palmolive (CL) reports upcoming second-quarter earnings on July 31, 2026, following solid first-quarter organic sales growth of 2.9%.
- Unilever (UL) has pursued strategic portfolio adjustments, including activity around its foods business, which has influenced recent market positioning.
- Analyst price target revisions have been more frequent and generally positive for Colgate-Palmolive (CL) in recent weeks, while Unilever (UL) shows mixed ratings amid ongoing restructuring efforts.
- Risk profiles differ, with Colgate-Palmolive (CL) exhibiting relatively stable momentum and Unilever (UL) facing greater exposure to currency and emerging-market dynamics.
Introduction
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Unilever (UL) represent two established leaders in the global consumer staples sector, offering investors exposure to defensive equities with recurring demand for everyday products. This comparison examines their business models, recent price behavior, and market positioning to assist traders and long-term investors evaluating relative value within the personal care and household goods space. Market participants focused on stability, dividend consistency, and sector resilience may find the analysis particularly relevant when assessing allocation decisions between these two multinational corporations.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) specializes in oral care, personal care, and pet nutrition products, generating the majority of revenue from established brands with global distribution. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near $90.75, reflecting year-to-date gains of approximately 16.9% that have outpaced the S&P 500. Recent weeks have featured multiple upward revisions to analyst price targets from firms including UBS, JPMorgan, and Citi, supported by expectations for modest earnings growth ahead of the July 31, 2026, quarterly report. First-quarter results showed organic sales expansion, though operating margins faced pressure from input costs. Sentiment has remained constructive due to consistent demand and operational execution.
UL Overview and Recent Performance
Unilever (UL) operates a broader portfolio spanning personal care, home care, nutrition, and ice cream categories across multiple geographies. The stock closed recently at $60.94, with year-to-date performance around 5.2%. Recent weeks have included updates on portfolio optimization initiatives, notably developments tied to its foods segment. The company has also advanced share buyback programs announced earlier in the year. Performance has been tempered by currency fluctuations and varying regional growth rates, resulting in more muted returns relative to certain peers. Analyst commentary remains varied, balancing growth initiatives against margin considerations.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots page that highlights select AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of bots capable of trading thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with historical win rates and returns varying significantly across configurations. This diversity allows users to explore options aligned with specific risk tolerances and objectives. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed metrics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Unilever (UL) both emphasize recurring consumer purchases yet differ in scope and regional emphasis. Colgate-Palmolive (CL) maintains a narrower focus that has supported steadier recent momentum and outperformance on a year-to-date basis. Unilever (UL) benefits from greater diversification, which can provide ballast during category-specific weakness but introduces additional complexity in execution. Growth drivers for Colgate-Palmolive (CL) center on core brand strength and emerging-market penetration, while Unilever (UL) pursues broader strategic repositioning. Risk factors include input-cost inflation for both, with Unilever (UL) carrying incremental exposure from its foods exposure and currency translation. Market sentiment has tilted toward Colgate-Palmolive (CL) in recent analyst activity, though both equities trade within established consumer staples frameworks.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability, and positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to Colgate-Palmolive (CL) over Unilever (UL). This assessment reflects CL’s stronger year-to-date trajectory and more concentrated positive catalyst flow, though outcomes remain probabilistic and subject to evolving conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a StrongBuy and UL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
- UL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-0.83% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CL | UL | CL / UL | |
| Capitalization | 74.1B | 133B | 56% |
| EBITDA | 3.84B | 11.1B | 35% |
| Gain YTD | 19.741 | -2.501 | -789% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.59 | 20.97 | 175% |
| Revenue | 21B | 50.5B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 1.37B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.86B | N/A | - |
CL | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UL's Valuation (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (94). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (83). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (30). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (58). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (63). This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | UL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 36% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 10 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 28% |
Advertisement
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.