CL
Price
$90.41
Change
+$0.33 (+0.37%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.08B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$60.80
Change
+$0.60 (+1.00%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
132.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL vs UL

CL vs UL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CL vs. UL commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and UL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CL: $90.08 vs. UL: $60.21)
Brand notoriety: CL: Notable vs. UL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 96% vs. UL: 140%
Market capitalization -- CL: $72.08B vs. UL: $132.87B
CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $72.08B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $132.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $342.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $22.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CL and UL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the short-term than CL.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -3.69% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -3.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-0.73% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($133B) has a higher market cap than CL($72.1B). CL has higher P/E ratio than UL: CL (34.91) vs UL (20.39). CL YTD gains are higher at: 16.069 vs. UL (-6.344). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.1B vs. CL (3.9B). UL has higher revenues than CL: UL (50.5B) vs CL (20.8B).
CLULCL / UL
Capitalization72.1B133B54%
EBITDA3.9B11.1B35%
Gain YTD16.069-6.344-253%
P/E Ratio34.9120.39171%
Revenue20.8B50.5B41%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt7.97BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
CL
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7667
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6487
SMR RATING
1..100
429
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2159
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UL's Valuation (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (94). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (87). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (4) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (29). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (50). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (59). This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMRA1.560.02
+1.30%
Neumora Therapeutics
NVO48.18-0.01
-0.02%
Novo-Nordisk A/S
PEBO39.80-0.27
-0.67%
Peoples Bancorp
LUMN6.53-0.17
-2.54%
Lumen Technologies
LIVE9.86-0.69
-6.54%
Live Ventures

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
-2.62%
PG - UL
68%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
CL - UL
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
CHD - UL
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
CLX - UL
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
KMB - UL
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
More